Notices
2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Observations About Gear Ratio Differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 05:54 PM
  #16  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Tim - It was a Lariat Sport and the brochure says it should have "LT275/65R18C OWL all-terrain tires". Mine has Hankook 275/55R20 tires. TireRack says the Lariat's tires should be 32" in diameter, and my specific ones are 32.1" in diameter. So I wouldn't think the tires make a difference. Or, am I missing something - as usual?
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 08:38 PM
  #17  
srb1194's Avatar
srb1194
Tuned
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 424
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
I was really surprised at how much difference there was, and still can't believe that it is only the delta between 3.31 and 3.55. But, doing the math that is a 7% change in torque to the rear wheels for the same throttle setting, and that's pretty significant. I assumed it was the non-EB six, but then spotted the boost gauge, so then guessed it was the 2.7L. Nope.

But, how much "learning" does the computer do of driving style? Might someone have been driving the Lariat around that never asked it to downshift? It seemed reluctant to do that, so was frequently slow to respond to my gently requests.
With the Max Tow I assume you have the 3.73. Right? This was intended for Glue Guy.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 09:02 PM
  #18  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Originally Posted by srb1194
With the Max Tow I assume you have the 3.73. Right? This was intended for Glue Guy.
Not sure I understand, but I have 3.55's and I think GG has 3.31's. And I think I'm in the same boat as Tim - my truck is fast, so what would 3.73's be like?
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 11:06 PM
  #19  
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
Bleed Ford Blue
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,578
Likes: 157
From: Anchorage Alaska
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by tseekins
When the CC is used, the PCM will do what ever it takes to maintain your desired speed no matter the terrain.
That's the same way I drive haha Wide open throttle is common place

Our sales truck is a 2013 Eco 3.31's and it's not any fun to drive. I've always been a fan of deeper gearing, i know it's not as much of an issue with the new transmissions but it's still noticeable.

Super happy with 3.73's and my 6.2
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:01 AM
  #20  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 357
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Interesting. That's kinda what I was finding with the Lariat yesterday. Nothing, nothing, and then I got both the downshift and boost. And you have 3.31's?
Yes. 3.31 and 4x4 and 3.5L EB. The truck does not lack for power at all. Controlling it in low RPM situations is the challenge. Sometimes it is nothing or all.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:05 AM
  #21  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 357
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Not sure I understand, but I have 3.55's and I think GG has 3.31's. And I think I'm in the same boat as Tim - my truck is fast, so what would 3.73's be like?
Right. I'm on the 3.31. No question our truck gets out of the way in a hurry. I get that big smile whenever I have to step on it for any reason (or no reason). If it had 3.55 or 3.73 I'm thinking the rear tires would be liquid rubber a lot of the time.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 12:12 AM
  #22  
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 730
Likes: 9
From: plymouth mi
Not sure, but the max tow pkg for 2015 and up is a 3.55, 3.73 not available except maybe on max payload pkg. with either the 3.55 or 3.73, traction in 2 wheel drive is questionable, these trucks are quick for what they are.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 07:21 AM
  #23  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
BP - I found my 3.55's make the truck easier to drive than the Lariat's 3.31's. Instead of it needing to shift and not doing it until it does and boost also comes on, mine has the engine spinning faster and doesn't need to shift as often. And, when it does need more power it either shifts or the turbos come on faster. So instead of the nothing, nothing, nothing, and then wham, you get both barrels, mine does it much more gently. So my wife doesn't say very often "why did you do that?"

But, when I do want it to GO it does. Last Christmastime we had our son, his wife, and our granddaughter with us in STL. He was in the back seat giving directions, but got caught up in a conversation and was late to tell me I needed out of the fast lane to make an exit. There were a few other vehicles 'twixt us and the exit lane that was coming up pretty quickly, but we made it with room to spare. His comment was "I'd heard that these things can move, but I was beginning to doubt it. They sure can."
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
tvsjr's Avatar
tvsjr
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by GlueGuy
Yes. 3.31 and 4x4 and 3.5L EB. The truck does not lack for power at all. Controlling it in low RPM situations is the challenge. Sometimes it is nothing or all.
Same config here. Sport mode around town fixes the low RPM issue... it purposefully keeps things geared down a bit and higher RPMs. On the highway, drop out of sport mode (or set cruise) to drop into 6th gear and enjoy nice low RPMs/better MPG at high-speed cruise.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 04:09 PM
  #25  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 357
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by tvsjr
Same config here. Sport mode around town fixes the low RPM issue... it purposefully keeps things geared down a bit and higher RPMs. On the highway, drop out of sport mode (or set cruise) to drop into 6th gear and enjoy nice low RPMs/better MPG at high-speed cruise.
I don't notice it at all around town; only when coming up the mountain (which is pretty much daily for me). I've been using tow mode, and I get similar results in sport mode (although I haven't used sport mode much).
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2016 | 08:08 AM
  #26  
Bojo1961's Avatar
Bojo1961
New User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
if ford only a manual tranns in a 1/2 ton ,, the world would be a better place. total tire diameter, width, weight and hardness of the compound have a huge effect on mpgs. but to those guys who like the higher 3.31 or 3.15 gear ratios. just remember your tranns is doing alot more shifting and or lugging in gear. which in gerneral means faster wear on internal tranns parts.. in the early 2000s the explorer had 3.27 3.55 and 3.73 and the ranger had 4.10 both with 4.0 55re tranns. at my dealership we always had 3.27 and 3.55 explorers in for tranns repairs. 3.73 ratios a lot less and hardly ever a ranger for tranns isssues.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2016 | 09:00 AM
  #27  
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 724
From: Calgary Canada
Not at all "apples to apples", but back when I had my 2012 with the 3.5EB and the 3.31 gearing, I felt that they were a good combination for my useage. When towing, especially up hills, I probably needed to downshift one gear further than a 3.73 truck would have, but it was no drama or hassle. And since most of my driving had nothing heavier than my fat carcass to haul around, the 3.31 was excellent on the highway, and got what I considered to be very good mileage. Without a load, it rarely downshifted for minor hills.

For my next truck, I will take 3.55 or 3.31 if I'm buying off the lot. If I end up ordering, I actually think I'd buy 3.31, unless I end up with max tow, which would force my hand.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2016 | 09:30 AM
  #28  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
I believe the truck would shift more, but I haven't seen any evidence to indicate reduced transmission life as a result. If and when we see 6R80s blowing up, we may have some evidence to back this up, but at the moment failures seem quite rare.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2016 | 09:43 AM
  #29  
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,873
Likes: 357
From: Mts. S. of San Francisco
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
Not at all "apples to apples", but back when I had my 2012 with the 3.5EB and the 3.31 gearing, I felt that they were a good combination for my useage. When towing, especially up hills, I probably needed to downshift one gear further than a 3.73 truck would have, but it was no drama or hassle. And since most of my driving had nothing heavier than my fat carcass to haul around, the 3.31 was excellent on the highway, and got what I considered to be very good mileage. Without a load, it rarely downshifted for minor hills.

For my next truck, I will take 3.55 or 3.31 if I'm buying off the lot. If I end up ordering, I actually think I'd buy 3.31, unless I end up with max tow, which would force my hand.
I'm in the same boat. Ours has the 3.31 gears, and it seems to be fine for most "normal" driving, and we've had no issues when towing. It might be one gear lower when pulling a load, but that's about it. With the 10-speed in the 2017, I would think that the rear gear selection would be even less of an issue.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2016 | 03:42 PM
  #30  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Thread Starter
|
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
I had all of these thoughts while driving today. Would 3.31's be better since 5th would be slightly higher, so 5th would be a good towing gear. Might the gear ratios on the 10-speed make it even better for towing?

Anyway, we are home. I plan to fill up the truck in an hour or so and hope to update y'all with the finished spreadsheet later tonight. But, the LoM is sitting on 12.0, meaning we might have gotten 11.3 MPG for the last leg. And, since we filled up in essentially the same place on the way down, we can compare the assumed 11.3 to the actual 10.0 MPG.

We're there some differences? Yes. On the way down I ran 65 average but let it slack off to 60 uphill and run to 70 downhill. On the way back I brought the turbos in hard to keep it at or above 65 MPH. And the boat weighs about 250 lbs more since the fuel tank has 40 more gallons in it now. And today we had a serious crosswind that we didn't have going down. In other words, the leg back should have worse MPG than the one down.

So, why the 1.3 MPG diff? Octane. If I remember correctly, I think we probably had 89 octane gas in on the way down, and we had 91 octane on the way back.

Oh yes, about two miles from home we have to cross a highway. As I started out a guy came over the hill so I got on the throttle a bit - and lit the rear tires. And that was just a "bit" of extra throttle - I had a lot left.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE