Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

manual steering box conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 12:41 PM
  #1  
Nick-1973-ford's Avatar
Nick-1973-ford
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Denver,CO
manual steering box conversion

It seems that this topic is somewhat unclear and little confusing at times.

I have 73 f100 4x4 with manual steering box and power assist ram cylinder which i have rebuilt with new gaskets along with a power steering pump. Now i have a leaky power hose and it seems that the control valve is sipping tiny bit of fluid as well. (lucas dresser should work i assume). In any case, i wanted to see if i could convert my manual box into a Siginaw power box. (i have coils in the front and 4" lift).
Any recommendations?

Nick
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 02:15 PM
  #2  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
1973/75 F100 4WD & 1973/77 F250 4WD with Power Assist P/S use the manual steering gear box because it has nothing to do with Power Assist.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 02:52 PM
  #3  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Nick-1973-ford
It seems that this topic is somewhat unclear and little confusing at times.

I have 73 f100 4x4 with manual steering box and power assist ram cylinder which i have rebuilt with new gaskets along with a power steering pump. Now i have a leaky power hose and it seems that the control valve is sipping tiny bit of fluid as well. (lucas dresser should work i assume). In any case, i wanted to see if i could convert my manual box into a Siginaw power box. (i have coils in the front and 4" lift).
Any recommendations?

Nick
Do you mean the integral PS gear as used from 76-79 half-tons 4x4s?
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 03:43 PM
  #4  
Nick-1973-ford's Avatar
Nick-1973-ford
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Denver,CO
Originally Posted by HIO Silver
Do you mean the integral PS gear as used from 76-79 half-tons 4x4s?
Yes. Did i get it wrong to say to get rid of manual box and replace it with power steering box?
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 07:00 PM
  #5  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Nick-1973-ford
Yes. Did i get it wrong to say to get rid of manual box and replace it with power steering box?
No.. I'm just confirming since the comment above muddied the discussion.

In any case, I did a manual steering to integral PS swap on my 73 4x4 using a 78/79 steering system - gear, tie rod & drag link, and steering shaft.

Your drum Dana 44's steering arms will require reaming because the later tie rods studs have thicker shanks. Based on my parts comparison, disc-equipped Dana 44 steering arms have more meat on them than our drum-equipped Dana 44s. The reamer ya need is 7°... available from Speedway Motors or ya borrow one.

On my rig, I used the 78/79 steering shaft and had to grind a flat spot in the steering column shaft because the column shaft is fully splined whereas the donor shaft is a single-D.

Third, the new steering box location will align directly with the front crossmember and the two rear bolts will need to be really long. I sleeved my frame... a total pain in the azz.

If I were to do it again, I would use a 2WD steering gear and modify its internals so the pitman arm points rearwards. That way the gear mounts well forward of the crossmember basically the same position as the manual box. A longer and different steering shaft will be required since the integral box uses a rag joint. There is a link in the Tech Info Compilation on how to reverse the sector shaft.

To note, model year 1976 is the only year half-ton 4WDs used the integral system with an FE engine.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 07:37 PM
  #6  
Nick-1973-ford's Avatar
Nick-1973-ford
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Denver,CO
Originally Posted by HIO Silver
No.. I'm just confirming since the comment above muddied the discussion.

In any case, I did a manual steering to integral PS swap on my 73 4x4 using a 78/79 steering system - gear, tie rod & drag link, and steering shaft.

Your drum Dana 44's steering arms will require reaming because the later tie rods studs have thicker shanks. Based on my parts comparison, disc-equipped Dana 44 steering arms have more meat on them than our drum-equipped Dana 44s. The reamer ya need is 7°... available from Speedway Motors or ya borrow one.

On my rig, I used the 78/79 steering shaft and had to grind a flat spot in the steering column shaft because the column shaft is fully splined whereas the donor shaft is a single-D.

Third, the new steering box location will align directly with the front crossmember and the two rear bolts will need to be really long. I sleeved my frame... a total pain in the azz.

If I were to do it again, I would use a 2WD steering gear and modify its internals so the pitman arm points rearwards. That way the gear mounts well forward of the crossmember basically the same position as the manual box. A longer and different steering shaft will be required since the integral box uses a rag joint. There is a link in the Tech Info Compilation on how to reverse the sector shaft.

To note, model year 1976 is the only year half-ton 4WDs used the integral system with an FE engine.
Thank you for a thorough description.
Sounds handful. I am not in the position to sleeve my frame just yet or as other members in the forum drilled new holes yo instal their conversions and mods.
The way i figured it since there is a power steering box available i could replace the manual box with little modification, but as you pointed out it needs a much broader modification.

At this point i am just done with rebuilding my power assist steering and the only thing that worries me is the steering cylinder sitting almost underneath the front axle with shaft being exposed (i am putting a boot). If not careful being off road that thing might be bent or worse - torn off and it is a $500 replacement.

Nick
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 07:39 PM
  #7  
Nick-1973-ford's Avatar
Nick-1973-ford
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: Denver,CO
Hio silver - would you mind posting some images of your p/s system - if you have any. We have same year vehicle.


On the other note... we have this website that claiming the manual replacement with just a box and a rod...
http://benchworksteering.com/product...ng-conversion/

And I read your posts from 2014 HIO Sliver about this website. What are your thoughts about it?


Thanks
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2016 | 11:06 PM
  #8  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Nick-1973-ford
Thank you for a thorough description.
Sounds handful. I am not in the position to sleeve my frame just yet or as other members in the forum drilled new holes yo instal their conversions and mods.

At this point i am just done with rebuilding my power assist steering and the only thing that worries me is the steering cylinder sitting almost underneath the front axle with shaft being exposed (i am putting a boot). If not careful being off road that thing might be bent or worse - torn off and it is a $500 replacement.
Sleeving is recommended because the frame section for the rear two holes ends up on a slanted portion of the boxed frame rail.

Originally Posted by Nick-1973-ford
Hio silver - would you mind posting some images of your p/s system - if you have any. We have same year vehicle.

On the other note... we have this website that claiming the manual replacement with just a box and a rod...
1966 ? 1975 Ford F-100 4×4 Power Steering Conversion ? Benchwork Steering Systems

And I read your posts from 2014 HIO Sliver about this website. What are your thoughts about it?

Thanks
The most important pic is below... the rear two holes are sleeved.. the bolt for the forward hole was snaked into the boxed section and simply nutted... no sleeve.

This pic below is from early in the swap but you can see the gear's relative position to the coil bucket. Whoever owned this rig before me fabbed up a dual shock mount by welding a plate on the forward side of the coil bucket and a tab to the front of the C-bracket below. Hokey and totally unnecessary with how stiff these trucks ride.

I did my swap for $353. Compare that to the Benchworks system and you may understand why I chose this route (I also wanted to pay off my mortgage as soon as possible!). I scored the steering gear but it turned out to have lots of play. There was a Redhead Steering group by about a year ago and was replaced... all is night and tight now.

Oh, a last note.. your oil filter is horizontal, right? Well, the integral steering box below and a spec-oil filter will share the same space so either a 90-degree housing is needed or a shorter oil filter... I went with the latter with an Motorcraft FL-300.. the FL-1's little brother.

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teardropty
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Apr 6, 2012 01:55 AM
fordman954
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Feb 16, 2006 01:52 PM
ScottJM
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
May 22, 2004 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE