Notices
2014+ Transit 2014+ full size Ford Transit Van, Wagon, Cutaway and Chassis-Cab

Test drove a Transit today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 07:02 AM
  #16  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by tseekins
Tom,

If you can source a Transit with the 3.5L EB and the 3.73 axle, you can achieve a 7100 pound tow rating with an amazing 3600 pound payload. It seems that the regular length low roof still weighs in at a hefty 6200 lbs.
That's what doesn't make sense Tim! That configuration cargo van is rated to tow 7,000 lbs. They call the passenger variants "wagons", and if you go down to that section of the chart they are only rated for 4,600 lbs with the EB engine. At the end of the day that wouldn't stop me though. I've towed a lot of things, and a heavy Transit with that long wheelbase would make a very stable towing platform, and I'm certain the EB certainly has the power for it. I'd be using some flavor OBD gauge to monitor transmission and engine temps.

Low-roof options are the only one we could consider, anything higher and it wouldn't fit under a 7' clearance parking garage which would make hospital appointments impossible. That van we test drove was 6,225 lbs as per the payload sticker. 9,000 lbs GVWR - 2,750 payload. Substantially beefier than the F150.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 07:52 AM
  #17  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
I would imagine they are basing the tow ratings on having passengers in the van. With a cargo van you can base the tow ratings on an empty shell.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 08:50 AM
  #18  
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 7
From: Lewisberry, Penn
Koons in Maryland has two '15 diesel model T350s as leftovers showing. I bet they'd be willing to cut a deal. I didn't see any listed in MN, though there may be some in between. Do keep in mind they are one of the states with not advertising the destination cost ($1195) and higher doc fees than others, but still, they give good pricing, just perhaps better on paper than reality.

Vans deprecate, and wagons even more so. Still, I've tried buying used E wagons for customers at auction and the practical retail price always comes in to the $22-24k range for a 20-30k used rental van gas motor. That's got the deprecation of being both a van, and an obsolete model. The two I found are diesel models and would probably sell for around $40-41k. That's a bit more than $15k but includes the $5k diesel motors. Also keep in mind ford offers $1000 towards mobility upfits, which you don't get on used, so that's another piece to consider.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 08:57 AM
  #19  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Frantz
Koons in Maryland has two '15 diesel model T350s as leftovers showing. I bet they'd be willing to cut a deal. I didn't see any listed in MN, though there may be some in between. Do keep in mind they are one of the states with not advertising the destination cost ($1195) and higher doc fees than others, but still, they give good pricing, just perhaps better on paper than reality.

Vans deprecate, and wagons even more so. Still, I've tried buying used E wagons for customers at auction and the practical retail price always comes in to the $22-24k range for a 20-30k used rental van gas motor. That's got the deprecation of being both a van, and an obsolete model. The two I found are diesel models and would probably sell for around $40-41k. That's a bit more than $15k but includes the $5k diesel motors. Also keep in mind ford offers $1000 towards mobility upfits, which you don't get on used, so that's another piece to consider.
Thanks Doug, I was hoping you'd offer your perspective here.

My big interest for the diesel engine is the retained resale value as well as fuel economy, but I don't think that could overcome that kind of price disparity. I'd love a new van, but they appear to depreciate WAY too fast to justify that. The $1,000 mobility credit is great, but the van would still lose $10K in the first year of ownership. If used vans held their values like trucks it would be a completely different situation.

Glad to hear someone stocks diesel passenger variants, were those two low roof models?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 11:23 AM
  #20  
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 7
From: Lewisberry, Penn
Yep they were low roofs. I just looked specifically for low roof 350s, there may be some others out there as well, but it sounded like you wanted the payload. Those conversions aren't cheap. I'm doing one out in Pittsburgh next week where they are cutting a floor in the body and its a $25k conversion! I'd want every extra year of use that I could muster for that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 11:35 AM
  #21  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Frantz
Yep they were low roofs. I just looked specifically for low roof 350s, there may be some others out there as well, but it sounded like you wanted the payload. Those conversions aren't cheap. I'm doing one out in Pittsburgh next week where they are cutting a floor in the body and its a $25k conversion! I'd want every extra year of use that I could muster for that.
We wouldn't be doing that kind of conversion, the regular layout would actually work pretty well. The 12-passenger seating models work great because they don't have any 3-wide benches, and the interior height is more than sufficient. So we would just need a lift and anchor points installed.

Long wheelbase is needed, but not necessarily a 350 if they come any other way.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 12:31 PM
  #22  
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 7
From: Lewisberry, Penn
Wagons are just 150/350 and yeah, if you want the 148" wb it'll be a 350.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 07:00 PM
  #23  
star gazer's Avatar
star gazer
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MisterCMK
I would imagine they are basing the tow ratings on having passengers in the van. With a cargo van you can base the tow ratings on an empty shell.
Tow ratings are without cargo or passengers for all model vans. The wagon has much more weight with the interior panels and seats. Doubt it is 2000+ lbs but it is more.

Watch the Gross combined weight ratings on these as well. Any cargo weight and passengers take away from the max trailer capacity. They also have a chart somewhere about the frontal area too.

My cargo is the 9000gvw with max combined of 11,200. My max tow rating was around 5500 lbs. My max payload is about 3350, and I weigh about 5650 empty with just myself and fuel.

11,200 less 5500 trailer is 5700 or about the weight of the van.

11,200 less max cargo 3350, less 5650 van, equal what I can tow. 2200 lbs.

I think the unibody construction really hurts max weightsm however I have towed about 13,00 miles so far within 200 lbs of max and it tows like a dream.

Dean

2016 T250, 9K, med roof, long WB, 3.5 eco with 3.31LS.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 07:10 PM
  #24  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Thanks Dean, what I can't figure out is how the GCWR is different between van and wagon. We're looking at a low-roof long-wheelbase wagon with the EcoBoost engine and 3.73s.

Waaaaait a minute. Just went to look at the chart, and it appears you can't get 3.73 gears in an EcoBoost wagon. Interesting.

For what it's worth, the empty weight of the van we drove was 6,200 lbs as per the door sticker.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 07:22 PM
  #25  
star gazer's Avatar
star gazer
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
If it weights 6200 then that is a 5000 lb left over from GCWR. Again that means you can tow that much if you are empty.

However there a some on the Ford Transit Forum that are towing heavier with 3.31 and are happy with performance. I don't want to risk going over for several reasons, but I figure the Ford engineers would love to rate it higher if they felt comfortable doing so.

check out this thread;
Heavy towing with E.B. and 3.31? - Ford Transit USA Forum
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 08:40 PM
  #26  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Thanks, very interesting thread!

I've towed a lot of things with a lot of different vehicles, in a past life I was a professional truck driver. What I know about the Transit suggests it would be a great tow platform, of course the big limitation would be finding a heavy duty hitch. The chassis offers a LOT of headroom for tongue weight, and the relatively long wheelbase would be great for towing stability. The EcoBoost engine, 6R80 transmission, and 9.75" axle all have a fantastic track record in the F150s, my only concern would be transmission cooling, and that can be monitored and altered if necessary.

We'll see, at the moment we are really leaning towards an EcoBoost Transit. Closest one I can find is about 1,000 miles away so it may be time for a little road trip. We won't be doing anything until next month at the earliest, so our opinion could change.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 09:05 PM
  #27  
star gazer's Avatar
star gazer
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I did order mine with the HD tow package and trailer brake. Brake works very well with just plug and play. I never have had to use the tow mode with my small trailer. Does not hunt at all but I don't use cruise control when towing.

This tows better than my previous F250 7.3 PSD as far as handling and power when needed. Of course the F250 had way more than enough tow capacity but the engine always seemed a bit sluggish, at least compared to the EB now.

I would suggest to order exactly what you want, it is worth the wait.

Good luck.

Dean
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YoGeorge
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
68
Jul 17, 2016 11:09 PM
EvanBly
Transit Connect
5
May 17, 2016 09:34 PM
vettex2
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
86
Apr 24, 2015 09:13 PM
gearloose1
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
2
Sep 26, 2010 12:31 AM
IzzyR
1997 - 2003 F150
2
May 22, 2003 04:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE