Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

which tranny: '88 F150 RWD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-10-2016, 12:21 PM
GoldCo's Avatar
GoldCo
GoldCo is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Question which tranny: '88 F150 RWD?

i'm looking for a manual tranny for a '95 5.8L that will be going in a '52 F3.

found a local ad that says he's got a 5 speed out of an '88 F150 2x4 from behind a 5.0.

which transmission would this be? a good candidate for me behind the 351?

thanks.
 
  #2  
Old 02-10-2016, 01:46 PM
WiscoTruckGuy's Avatar
WiscoTruckGuy
WiscoTruckGuy is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The trans would most likely be an M5OD trans. If they are taken care of and not abused, they hold up fine, but if behind a 351 in your truck, it might be a little less sketchy to run a ford ZF5. M5OD's can be potentially breakable if behind a 351, but it also always depends on what kind of abuse it would go through.
 
  #3  
Old 02-10-2016, 02:41 PM
GoldCo's Avatar
GoldCo
GoldCo is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
thanks...
so presumably looking for a F250 or above then, correct? suppose any model year would work as long as SBF bolt pattern.
 
  #4  
Old 02-10-2016, 03:04 PM
88n94's Avatar
88n94
88n94 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,006
Likes: 0
Received 125 Likes on 108 Posts
Originally Posted by GoldCo
thanks...
so presumably looking for a F250 or above then, correct? suppose any model year would work as long as SBF bolt pattern.
You will probably want the speedometer drive? If so go 1991 or older.

I think the ZF-5 came out in 1988, so 1988 to 1991 if you want a ZF-5 with the speedometer drive.
 
  #5  
Old 02-10-2016, 04:06 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
You do need to be a little careful with F-250s. Standard F-250s could have the lighter duty trans also (especially if they have a 302 V8). Most F-250s however were the F-250HD which would have the heavier trans (same as F-350). The F-250HD had a full floating rear axle while the standard F-250 had a semi-float. That's the easiest giveaway if you see the truck.

And FYI, "M5OD" means two different things. To Ford it meant any 5 speed manual transmission with an overdrive. On bulletin boards it usually means the Mazda-built 5 speed used in half-ton trucks. That's also called the M5R2 on boards, and I think I heard that Ford called it an M5OD-R2.

The heavier trans used in F-250HD and F-350 is almost always called a ZF5, but I heard that Ford called it an M5OD-HD.

As far as which transmission you want, it depends on what you want. the Mazda trans isn't as strong and might not hold up to heavy use behind a 351. But the ZF trans is heavier shifting, with wider ratios, and might not be a great choice in a hot rod.
 
  #6  
Old 02-10-2016, 04:42 PM
GoldCo's Avatar
GoldCo
GoldCo is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
As far as which transmission you want, it depends on what you want. the Mazda trans isn't as strong and might not hold up to heavy use behind a 351. But the ZF trans is heavier shifting, with wider ratios, and might not be a great choice in a hot rod.
thanks... this truck shouldn't see heavy-duty use -- it will have a flatbed on it and will primarily be a "mountain" truck for camping and mountain biking. more concerned about low-end torque (for street) but also highway gears (hence the 5 spd). won't be hauling or towing (famous last words, i suppose).
 
  #7  
Old 02-10-2016, 09:24 PM
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Nothing Special is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by GoldCo
thanks... this truck shouldn't see heavy-duty use -- it will have a flatbed on it and will primarily be a "mountain" truck for camping and mountain biking. more concerned about low-end torque (for street) but also highway gears (hence the 5 spd). won't be hauling or towing (famous last words, i suppose).
Either trans could work for you then. The ZF will have a lower 1st gear (too low to use in most street driving, but great for creeping over a rough trail) while the Mazda will have 4 usable gears (plus overdrive) so smaller gaps between gears (as well as shifting easier) which you might prefer in most of your driving.

Personally I've never driven either, but I did choose an NV3550 (more like the Mazda than the ZF) for my Bronco (I get the low gearing I need from an Atlas transfer case).
 
  #8  
Old 02-10-2016, 10:02 PM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
Either trans could work for you then. The ZF will have a lower 1st gear (too low to use in most street driving, but great for creeping over a rough trail) while the Mazda will have 4 usable gears (plus overdrive) so smaller gaps between gears (as well as shifting easier) which you might prefer in most of your driving.

Personally I've never driven either, but I did choose an NV3550 (more like the Mazda than the ZF) for my Bronco (I get the low gearing I need from an Atlas transfer case).
The ZF doesn't differ much from what you'd expect to experience when driving say a 28 foot straight truck with a 5 speed (without splitting the axle).

Shifting the gates are pretty far apart and throw is fairy long, nothing could be considered really quick about it and or done with a mere flick of the wrist. The width of its H pattern probably the worse of the two evils.

As you previously mentioned not a trans and shifter combo would consider ideal choice in a vehicle setup as a hot rod!
 
  #9  
Old 02-12-2016, 09:49 AM
MtTheJeffro's Avatar
MtTheJeffro
MtTheJeffro is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Penndel, PA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZF5 is fine as long as you know how to shift properly

I've driven both and personally prefer the ZF. The M5OD seemed a bit sloppier to me but it could have just been worn out.
 
  #10  
Old 02-12-2016, 10:32 AM
danr1's Avatar
danr1
danr1 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sand Lake, MI
Posts: 5,670
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by MtTheJeffro
ZF5 is fine as long as you know how to shift properly

I've driven both and personally prefer the ZF. The M5OD seemed a bit sloppier to me but it could have just been worn out.
Oh sure it does was just commenting on how it shifts more like a heavy truck rather than a something built for other use.

Longer handle with heavy yet positive feel to it that isn't sloppy, a truck transmission that wasn't intended for real quick shifting but at the same time it isn't necessary normal use.

Gonna built a race car/truck I wouldn't necessarily start with a F350 either though!
 
  #11  
Old 02-12-2016, 10:57 AM
MtTheJeffro's Avatar
MtTheJeffro
MtTheJeffro is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Penndel, PA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by danr1
Oh sure it does was just commenting on how it shifts more like a heavy truck rather than a something built for other use.

Longer handle with heavy yet positive feel to it that isn't sloppy, a truck transmission that wasn't intended for real quick shifting but at the same time it isn't necessary normal use.

Gonna built a race car/truck I wouldn't necessarily start with a F350 either though!
Agreed. A good clutch and flywheel will do wonders for speed shifting. I'm quite happy with my ZF/diesel combo and how quickly I can shift it. Sadly, I don't know what could easily be put behind a 351 that is a bit smoother. Maybe the M5OD with a short shifter is the way to go here
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GarrettW
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
01-25-2012 11:02 PM
breedo99
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
09-16-2004 07:12 AM
1BeatnZJ
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-15-2003 03:56 PM
fomocotuff
Car/truck Buying Advice
3
09-09-2002 09:38 PM



Quick Reply: which tranny: '88 F150 RWD?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.