which tranny: '88 F150 RWD?
#1
#2
The trans would most likely be an M5OD trans. If they are taken care of and not abused, they hold up fine, but if behind a 351 in your truck, it might be a little less sketchy to run a ford ZF5. M5OD's can be potentially breakable if behind a 351, but it also always depends on what kind of abuse it would go through.
#4
I think the ZF-5 came out in 1988, so 1988 to 1991 if you want a ZF-5 with the speedometer drive.
#5
You do need to be a little careful with F-250s. Standard F-250s could have the lighter duty trans also (especially if they have a 302 V8). Most F-250s however were the F-250HD which would have the heavier trans (same as F-350). The F-250HD had a full floating rear axle while the standard F-250 had a semi-float. That's the easiest giveaway if you see the truck.
And FYI, "M5OD" means two different things. To Ford it meant any 5 speed manual transmission with an overdrive. On bulletin boards it usually means the Mazda-built 5 speed used in half-ton trucks. That's also called the M5R2 on boards, and I think I heard that Ford called it an M5OD-R2.
The heavier trans used in F-250HD and F-350 is almost always called a ZF5, but I heard that Ford called it an M5OD-HD.
As far as which transmission you want, it depends on what you want. the Mazda trans isn't as strong and might not hold up to heavy use behind a 351. But the ZF trans is heavier shifting, with wider ratios, and might not be a great choice in a hot rod.
And FYI, "M5OD" means two different things. To Ford it meant any 5 speed manual transmission with an overdrive. On bulletin boards it usually means the Mazda-built 5 speed used in half-ton trucks. That's also called the M5R2 on boards, and I think I heard that Ford called it an M5OD-R2.
The heavier trans used in F-250HD and F-350 is almost always called a ZF5, but I heard that Ford called it an M5OD-HD.
As far as which transmission you want, it depends on what you want. the Mazda trans isn't as strong and might not hold up to heavy use behind a 351. But the ZF trans is heavier shifting, with wider ratios, and might not be a great choice in a hot rod.
#6
thanks... this truck shouldn't see heavy-duty use -- it will have a flatbed on it and will primarily be a "mountain" truck for camping and mountain biking. more concerned about low-end torque (for street) but also highway gears (hence the 5 spd). won't be hauling or towing (famous last words, i suppose).
#7
thanks... this truck shouldn't see heavy-duty use -- it will have a flatbed on it and will primarily be a "mountain" truck for camping and mountain biking. more concerned about low-end torque (for street) but also highway gears (hence the 5 spd). won't be hauling or towing (famous last words, i suppose).
Personally I've never driven either, but I did choose an NV3550 (more like the Mazda than the ZF) for my Bronco (I get the low gearing I need from an Atlas transfer case).
Trending Topics
#8
Either trans could work for you then. The ZF will have a lower 1st gear (too low to use in most street driving, but great for creeping over a rough trail) while the Mazda will have 4 usable gears (plus overdrive) so smaller gaps between gears (as well as shifting easier) which you might prefer in most of your driving.
Personally I've never driven either, but I did choose an NV3550 (more like the Mazda than the ZF) for my Bronco (I get the low gearing I need from an Atlas transfer case).
Personally I've never driven either, but I did choose an NV3550 (more like the Mazda than the ZF) for my Bronco (I get the low gearing I need from an Atlas transfer case).
Shifting the gates are pretty far apart and throw is fairy long, nothing could be considered really quick about it and or done with a mere flick of the wrist. The width of its H pattern probably the worse of the two evils.
As you previously mentioned not a trans and shifter combo would consider ideal choice in a vehicle setup as a hot rod!
#9
#10
Longer handle with heavy yet positive feel to it that isn't sloppy, a truck transmission that wasn't intended for real quick shifting but at the same time it isn't necessary normal use.
Gonna built a race car/truck I wouldn't necessarily start with a F350 either though!
#11
Oh sure it does was just commenting on how it shifts more like a heavy truck rather than a something built for other use.
Longer handle with heavy yet positive feel to it that isn't sloppy, a truck transmission that wasn't intended for real quick shifting but at the same time it isn't necessary normal use.
Gonna built a race car/truck I wouldn't necessarily start with a F350 either though!
Longer handle with heavy yet positive feel to it that isn't sloppy, a truck transmission that wasn't intended for real quick shifting but at the same time it isn't necessary normal use.
Gonna built a race car/truck I wouldn't necessarily start with a F350 either though!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
breedo99
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
09-16-2004 07:12 AM
1BeatnZJ
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-15-2003 03:56 PM
fomocotuff
Car/truck Buying Advice
3
09-09-2002 09:38 PM