When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As I prepare to start my re-build of my '79 F-100, it was mentioned that I should box my frame since I plan on rebuilding the 302 engine.
I know that even a modest re-build of the 302 will add about 100hp to it, do I really need to box the frame? If so how far back do I need to go?
I'm just trying to get a handle as to what would be required. I am figuring around 325bhp or so for the engine is what I am shooting for, 350BHP would be nice but not required.
Shouldn't be any NEED to box the frame at all, but a little extra stiffness never hurt anything, Ford put 460's in the same truck with the same frame which made a lot more torque than a 302.
Shouldn't be any need to box the frame at all. The put 460's in the same truck which made a lot more torque than a 302.
Thank you for replying to my post!! This was my first thought as well, even if I make 320 ft-lbs of torque the 460 was right there with is so it should be fine as long as I keep it to about 350 or lower for HP and torque.
Boxing the frame would make sense if you are upgrading the suspension and planning to autocross... frame flex makes it difficult to tune a suspension for maximum performance. Also if you plan to drag race a flexing frame makes it difficult to obtain maximum traction for launch.
For general, daily driver duty a stock frame will certainly suffice as-is.
In addition to the "not needed" comments I will add a couple more. Boxing can be strong/stiff but traps moisture. If you are in an area with rain or worse salt, corrosion is an issue (think Jaguar classics). Also, absent design, analysis and test, boxing could create high stress areas and cracks.
In other words, forget about it and ignore whoever told you to...
Originally Posted by Blue and White
In addition to the "not needed" comments I will add a couple more. Boxing can be strong/stiff but traps moisture. If you are in an area with rain or worse salt, corrosion is an issue (think Jaguar classics). Also, absent design, analysis and test, boxing could create high stress areas and cracks.
Agree completely.....the frame has to have some flex.
Also, the frame is designed to collapse in a set way in the event of a collision to absorb the shock. If you box it, you are destroying that aspect of the frame.
If we all seem so sure that boxing is BAD...why are so many hot rods, trucks etc. with serious HP sporting boxed frames. Why is there kits vailable to fix those bad ole weak frames?
I would agree that the OP doesn't need this but I wonder how many have actually seen the bad things that boxing a frame has caused..... in person.
Other than flex, there's no reason for a boxed frame. Boxed frames are only about 12 years old in the pickup market. F-150 started that back in 04. They are great trucks, and no frame flex is kinda nice, but how many trucks have been made with open frames, and how much work have they done? Our trucks are decades old and still doing everything they did new.