HELP! 302 5.0 Rocker Arm/Pushrod Geometry
#1
HELP! 302 5.0 Rocker Arm/Pushrod Geometry
This is my first V8 rebuild and it's gone pretty smoothly until now. I'm installing roller rocker arms and when I do the "sharpie" test the wear on the valve is not in the center (see picture). Is this something I need to worry about? I've been told the geometry isn't right if the wear is not in the center of the valve. The engine is from a 1989 Lincoln Town Car with HO top end from a 1989 Mustang. The roller rocker arms and pushrods are Comp Cams and the pushrods are the stock length. Any help is appreciated.
#4
#5
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 31,013
Likes: 0
Received 1,019 Likes
on
800 Posts
Longer pushrods will only work if you also shim the pedestal base to achieve correct lifter preload spec which is only just beginning to compress the lifter plunger, that may improve the rocker geometry though. Shorter pushrods are a complete no go since you can't make the pedestal shorter to maintain lifter preload.. well you can but that would involve removing the heads and having a machine shop shave them down, and that is probably the wrong direction to go anyway.
Overall I don't know if it's worth bothering with as I doubt the current rocker geometry is any worse than it is with the factory rockers. Have you measured one of those? Why did you use 1.6 aftermarket rockers anyway? Did you have them kicking around or stumbled on a great deal? You could have used 1.7 rockers with the existing springs.
Overall I don't know if it's worth bothering with as I doubt the current rocker geometry is any worse than it is with the factory rockers. Have you measured one of those? Why did you use 1.6 aftermarket rockers anyway? Did you have them kicking around or stumbled on a great deal? You could have used 1.7 rockers with the existing springs.
#6
Not to put a wet blanket on here, but you really wasted your $$$ on those roller tipped rockers. Should have bought the full roller pedestal mount rockers. The roller trunion in the full rollers is where the real frictional loss occurs, not in the roller tips. If you'd watch a non roller tip function in slow motion, you'd see that it "rolls" across the valve stem in operation, the face of the rocker is curved, not flat to let this happen. With the full rollers, you just bolt em down and torque to 25 ft/lbs and you're done. The geometry if changed, amounts to nothing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roger dowty
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
08-27-2006 02:42 PM
Peter94
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
6
05-03-2006 04:09 PM
speedyredford
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
08-06-2004 08:59 PM