1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis Econolines. E150, E250, E350, E450 and E550

any reason to avoid mid 90s E series (vs. an early 2000's) Anything to be aware of?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 11-13-2015, 01:27 PM
annaleigh's Avatar
annaleigh
annaleigh is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,672
Received 167 Likes on 154 Posts
OK now!!!

I need to remember to watch it around here!!! Actually I had typed the thread about the TV cable adjustment in this thread for some reason,, I don't know, and then posted it.. I didn't know how to delete it so i edited it..
 
  #32  
Old 11-14-2015, 06:36 AM
JWA's Avatar
JWA
JWA is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Posts: 20,894
Received 1,399 Likes on 1,107 Posts
Originally Posted by annaleigh
OK now!!!

I need to remember to watch it around here!!! Actually I had typed the thread about the TV cable adjustment in this thread for some reason,, I don't know, and then posted it.. I didn't know how to delete it so i edited it..
Yes have have been (wrongly) accused of preying on those who mis-type something now and again!

I've done the same thing, posted something completely wrong or not serving the thread so either deleted the content or asked a moderator to delete my reply completely. Editing as you did is just as good----don't give it a second thought.
 
  #33  
Old 11-19-2015, 08:45 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,941
Likes: 0
Received 973 Likes on 768 Posts
IMO if you there is an era of these trucks to avoid it would be the 97 to 06 or there about, somewhere around 05 or 06 Ford sorted out the blown spark plug issue more or less, they never did produce a solution for the broken exhaust manifold bolts so if you buy a van with a mod motor you will be doing the manifolds sooner or later.. good luck with that because there is no room to work on the motor in the engine bay. If you buy a '96 or older van you won't have either of those engine problems and you also won't get a truck with cheap chinese axle/wheel bearings that will have to be replaced again and again, but you're buying an older truck that will develop more age related problems sooner, like wiring faults and brittle vacuum lines, rotted rubber bushings or body mounts, etc. The newer motor do get better gas milage and the newer transmissions are much better, I'm really liking the 4R75w in my 06 van. Some would say the newer motors are more powerful too which is true compared stock for stock, but it's dumb easy and cheap to get a lot more power out of the old pushrods and without impacting emissions either, so this isn't a plus for the newer motors IMO.
 
  #34  
Old 01-27-2016, 08:28 AM
Hotairjunkie's Avatar
Hotairjunkie
Hotairjunkie is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rocky Mtns. of Colorado
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't read through all of the responses, so this may have already been said. But, on the V10 motor at least, the HP output was increased substantially in 2000. I can't quote the numbers off the top of my head, but the 97 - 99 V10 had less power. From 2000 up, they reworked that motor and it has a noticeable increase in power in the 2000 and up motor.
 
  #35  
Old 01-27-2016, 08:55 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,430
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotairjunkie
I didn't read through all of the responses, so this may have already been said. But, on the V10 motor at least, the HP output was increased substantially in 2000. I can't quote the numbers off the top of my head, but the 97 - 99 V10 had less power. From 2000 up, they reworked that motor and it has a noticeable increase in power in the 2000 and up motor.
Same is true for all three modular engines, they got PI heads around that time.
 
  #36  
Old 01-27-2016, 09:11 AM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
Same is true for all three modular engines, they got PI heads around that time.
The van typically used the Romeo 4.6 (engine code W) along with the cars, Explorer, and Expy I think. The Romeo 4.6 got PI heads in 2001 I think (later than the Windsors). BUT there was a problem with 01-03 PI heads on the Romeo with bad cooling to the rear cylinders. Caused the rear cylinder exhaust valve stems to carbon up and click and stick...maybe burn valves later in life. My '02 E150 got a new pair of heads under warranty at about 42k miles...

The Windsor 4.6 and all 5.4 or V10's did not have this issue with PI heads, just the Romeo 4.6. So if you are looking at a 4.6 van from 2001-2003, listen for tapping (mine made the most noise thru the right front wheel well).

George
 
  #37  
Old 01-27-2016, 10:13 AM
gman97005's Avatar
gman97005
gman97005 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: In my house..
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I love the E150 through '96, in '97 they changed the grille and the van became fugly, aside from that i think the 351 Windsor with SD EFI is the best engine that Ford ever made but that's just my not so humble opinion..
 
  #38  
Old 01-27-2016, 11:25 AM
jimbomitch's Avatar
jimbomitch
jimbomitch is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I've got a 93 E150 that I bought in 2001 and it still serves me well. It's getting ready to turn 187,000. The original owner had a new engine installed at 120,000, it's a 5.0 that I really haven't done anything to except oil and filter changes.

As far as the body, it came from Texas so it's still in pretty good shape, rust wise, that is. The only big things I've had done is ball joints, tires and a couple mufflers/tail pipes. My plan is to drive it until the very end, whenever that is!
 
  #39  
Old 01-30-2016, 06:08 PM
maples01's Avatar
maples01
maples01 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryville
Posts: 4,768
Received 92 Likes on 87 Posts
I have a 99 E350, the year before PI heads, before the spark plug blowouts as that was the first gen PI head, after a superchip micro tuner, it is quite impressive for it's weight, I used to tow with it, was quite comparable to the 92 5.2 Dodge Dakota on acceleration when loaded. I had the transmission replaced, case had a crack in it, dad felt it was necessary, yet I had no problem on my 500 mile trips with it, now I'm ready to sell it, bought a classic van and only need one. I've had no issues in over 70,000 miles with it, been a great van.
 
  #40  
Old 04-18-2016, 10:29 AM
black & blue 78/9's Avatar
black & blue 78/9
black & blue 78/9 is online now
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Cheyenne, Wy
Posts: 755
Received 40 Likes on 31 Posts
What about 4.2?

My son just bought a 98 E250 cargo van with the 4.2L v6. This is just for driving. No hauling. He might have 1 or 2 friends a couple labs, a 10 speed bike, sleeping bag. Nothing as far as weight goes.
Does this 4.2 have blown spark plug issues or manifold bolt issues? His dip stick tube rusted out so he replaced that and the dip stick itself keeps getting blown out of the tube while driving and lost on the road. Just looking for info about the 4.2 reliability.
 
  #41  
Old 04-18-2016, 10:50 AM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by black & blue 78/9
My son just bought a 98 E250 cargo van with the 4.2L v6. This is just for driving. No hauling. He might have 1 or 2 friends a couple labs, a 10 speed bike, sleeping bag. Nothing as far as weight goes.
Does this 4.2 have blown spark plug issues or manifold bolt issues? His dip stick tube rusted out so he replaced that and the dip stick itself keeps getting blown out of the tube while driving and lost on the road. Just looking for info about the 4.2 reliability.
Well, it is usually better to ask questions like this before you make a vehicle purchase...

The 4.2 does not blow out spark plugs but it has intake manifold, front cover, and head gasket problems. At worst, cylinders fill with coolant and hydrolock the engine, resulting in major damage like rods thru the block. I would not touch a 4.2 with a 10 foot pole.

There is a V6 engine forum here also and you might find more generic 4.2 information there. Ford stopped using the 4.2 in the vans circa 2003. The 4.6 V8 gets better gas mileage and performs much better.

Blown out dipstick sounds like a pressurized crankcase. You need to do some immediate emergency troubleshooting. Good luck, but it does not sound good. Change the PCV valve, but if the dipstick keeps blowing out, you have bigtime blowby. Do a compression test next.

George
 
  #42  
Old 04-18-2016, 10:58 AM
maples01's Avatar
maples01
maples01 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryville
Posts: 4,768
Received 92 Likes on 87 Posts
Originally Posted by black & blue 78/9
My son just bought a 98 E250 cargo van with the 4.2L v6. This is just for driving. No hauling. He might have 1 or 2 friends a couple labs, a 10 speed bike, sleeping bag. Nothing as far as weight goes.
Does this 4.2 have blown spark plug issues or manifold bolt issues? His dip stick tube rusted out so he replaced that and the dip stick itself keeps getting blown out of the tube while driving and lost on the road. Just looking for info about the 4.2 reliability.
Yep, blowing out the dipstick, thats a sign you'll be needing to replace the engine.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mary-kate
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
07-01-2018 01:23 PM
NickC1012
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
2
09-16-2015 05:43 AM
EconolineFan
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
6
11-24-2011 09:28 PM
crabhab
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
2
01-10-2009 11:27 PM
crabhab
Ford vs The Competition
3
12-15-2005 05:24 PM



Quick Reply: any reason to avoid mid 90s E series (vs. an early 2000's) Anything to be aware of?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.