Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

First trip with the EX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 04:31 PM
  #16  
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
Bleed Ford Blue
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,578
Likes: 157
From: Anchorage Alaska
Club FTE Silver Member

IDK to me the 5.5 mpg does not sound crazy, I've gotten as low as 6 mpg in daily driving my empty Ex. Towing I keep my speed and put it to the floor and let the truck do the work at whatever RPM/Gear that may be. Plenty of time has been spent at 4,500 rpm in 2nd but holding 65+ up large hills in the mountains.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 06:42 PM
  #17  
repo_man's Avatar
repo_man
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 4
From: NOVA, for now
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
If you don't want to pull the cover(s) and deal with that mess, smell and expense right now you could do the old jack it up and spin the tire one revolution and count the driveshaft turns. Less than 4 turns = 3.73 and more than 4 = 4.10, I'd try to check both axles to be sure.
Either way you want more gear for that load you are pulling and if the PO did a swap from 3.73 to only 4.10 I don't know what his motivation or goal was with that small of a change.
What was your typical highway speed during the 5.5 MPG trip down there? Not looking to bust your stones, just trying to get a better picture of the scenario. Higher speeds will take their own bite of mileage and I know down that way the speed limits tend to run higher than in the Mid-Atlantic where I roam.
If you are looking for a good step in the right direction that can get done quickly and is sure to help some have a look at 5Star Tuning. I use their Performance tunes for my towing drives (found the Towing tunes to be too "aggressive" and downshifting too soon for my setup and preferences) the tunes do provide a little more GO but the biggest change will be in your trans performance, it will be so much better than stock. And they offer excellent customer service and can re-tweek any tune to take advantage of any future mods like gears, headers, CAI and exhaust. I really like my tunes from them and recently tried the 89 Octane Perf tune over the 87 one I had been using (and been very happy with) and the difference between the two tunes was very noticeable. With the 89 tune it felt like it had a little increase in power and I was able to push the throttle opening almost 15% higher while still holding onto OD under load while climbing grades, felt great!
A HA! I don't know why I didn't think of that. Defiantly 3.73's! So seeing that a definite gear change is in order, what ratio do you suggest? I'll be staying with stock tires and probably be towing at least the weight I tow now. The primary function of my X is my mule so it's on permanent tow duty. I tried to keep my speed at 70 because of the time constraints I had, which meant several shifts to 2nd at about 4500 rpm-ish. I do realize that'll usually drop the MPG's dramatically but again, I was on some pretty tough time constraints. Once I go on my short tour, I'll be able to order a lot of parts for the gear swap and probably the tuner from 5 star as well. As soon as I get home from my short tour, I'll be moving so in a perfect world, I'll have everything waiting for me when I get home, be able to knock it all out (at least the rear gears and have all the stuff to do the front) beak in the gears, change the fluid/make adjustments if needed, and hook up and go. We'll see how that all plays out though.

Originally Posted by agsmv1
Yep, I came up with some funky numbers using that calculator. I came up with this and 3.73 gears:

RPM CALCULATOR
Your RPM is about
Automatic Without Overdrive 2,522
Automatic With Overdrive 1,671
Manual 2,387
5 Speed 1,910

I believe the 2522 is much closer to the 2600 RPM's. Here is the link Differential Gear Ratio Calculator | West Coast Differentials
Awesome! Thank you! Yeah I agree, the 2522 is a little closer to 2600 but it pretty much justifies the 3.73's.

Originally Posted by AlaskanEx
IDK to me the 5.5 mpg does not sound crazy, I've gotten as low as 6 mpg in daily driving my empty Ex. Towing I keep my speed and put it to the floor and let the truck do the work at whatever RPM/Gear that may be. Plenty of time has been spent at 4,500 rpm in 2nd but holding 65+ up large hills in the mountains.
Yeah I see what you're saying, I was concerned that there may have been something wrong with my X because I've seen a lot of people say they get 8-9 towing more weight. Now if I can make some tweaks to give my X more power and better MPG's, I'm probably gonna go for it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 06:59 PM
  #18  
ExxWhy's Avatar
ExxWhy
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,888
Likes: 3,435
From: Ohio
On my stock size wheels and tires, I am just under 2200 @ 65 MPH in OD. When I had 3.73 gears it was a bit under 1900. If you are around 2000-2100 then you would have 4.10 gears.

4.10 came on pickup trucks and 5.4 EX rigs, but as far as I know it was not an option for a V10 EX. Perhaps the PO got a rear axle cheap from a truck with 4.10 ratio and then changed the front to match. That would explain the tags. Changing to 4.30 gears from 3.73 didn't change my towing mileage, just made the drive-ability much better.

Regardless, that doesn't explain your poor mileage. A good part of that is staying in 3rd gear drinks more fuel. But you should have been able to stay in OD on the level spots. Seems like you are down on power. An 8000 lb trailer should not be too much for your truck, especially with an aero nose on the trailer which definitely helps. Towing my flat fronted brick that weighs 7000 lbs, I never get less than 8, and usually 9+. That includes travel all over Wyoming with it.

Have you checked for codes? Does it seem to run properly, smooth in all gears etc? Possible intermittent misfire? I'd also change the PCV valve, cheap and easy.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 07:17 PM
  #19  
ExxWhy's Avatar
ExxWhy
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,888
Likes: 3,435
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by AlaskanEx
IDK to me the 5.5 mpg does not sound crazy, I've gotten as low as 6 mpg in daily driving my empty Ex. Towing I keep my speed and put it to the floor and let the truck do the work at whatever RPM/Gear that may be. Plenty of time has been spent at 4,500 rpm in 2nd but holding 65+ up large hills in the mountains.
That 6 MPG is in the dead of Alaska winter locked in 4WD and hours of idling per tank.

5.5 on the highway towing what the OP has for a trailer tells me something is fishy. So does not being able to hold OD on level ground.

When I had 3.73 gears, I could hold OD @ 65-70 on flat ground towing with no problem. It wanted to hunt gears @ 55-60.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 07:33 PM
  #20  
harley4jcs's Avatar
harley4jcs
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 1
From: Central Tx.
Originally Posted by repo_man
A HA! I don't know why I didn't think of that. Defiantly 3.73's! So seeing that a definite gear change is in order, what ratio do you suggest? I'll be staying with stock tires and probably be towing at least the weight I tow now. The primary function of my X is my mule so it's on permanent tow duty. I tried to keep my speed at 70 because of the time constraints I had, which meant several shifts to 2nd at about 4500 rpm-ish. I do realize that'll usually drop the MPG's dramatically but again, I was on some pretty tough time constraints. Once I go on my short tour, I'll be able to order a lot of parts for the gear swap and probably the tuner from 5 star as well. As soon as I get home from my short tour, I'll be moving so in a perfect world, I'll have everything waiting for me when I get home, be able to knock it all out (at least the rear gears and have all the stuff to do the front) beak in the gears, change the fluid/make adjustments if needed, and hook up and go. We'll see how that all plays out though.



Awesome! Thank you! Yeah I agree, the 2522 is a little closer to 2600 but it pretty much justifies the 3.73's.



Yeah I see what you're saying, I was concerned that there may have been something wrong with my X because I've seen a lot of people say they get 8-9 towing more weight. Now if I can make some tweaks to give my X more power and better MPG's, I'm probably gonna go for it.


I'm glad Alaskan X saw this thread, I was going to tell you about him AND HIS PLATES. They read 8MPG That's his hand calculated daily driver average !!
You have totally lost me in your eureka moment BUT I will say this: If your rear tag reads 4:10 & the front reads 3:73 you dang better really find out what's you got in them pumpkin's
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 07:41 PM
  #21  
05MilMachine's Avatar
05MilMachine
Cargo Master
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 4
From: North Texas
Fwiw the 3.73 axles i have seen have a bunch of codes on the tags. One of which on mine say "4.10" however I have 3.73 and its never been changed. I believe there are other codes on that tag that will tell you the gears.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 07:43 PM
  #22  
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx
Bleed Ford Blue
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,578
Likes: 157
From: Anchorage Alaska
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by ExxWhy
That 6 MPG is in the dead of Alaska winter locked in 4WD and hours of idling per tank.

5.5 on the highway towing what the OP has for a trailer tells me something is fishy. So does not being able to hold OD on level ground.

When I had 3.73 gears, I could hold OD @ 65-70 on flat ground towing with no problem. It wanted to hunt gears @ 55-60.


You do have me there, but it is empty commuting

With my trailer and truck loaded, lets say it's 5,500 in weight (need to scale it) I know my 3.73 truck can hold O/D on flat ground, but any sort of incline and i'm back in 3rd. This is with a 5-star tune and at 30ft-1,500ft above sea level, not close to the elevation and weight he is seeing. I'm just thinking it's not that far off what I see in my conditions. Now what I will say is I am able to get 8 MPG towing my trailer at 5+ the speed limit in the mountains, that is the same MPG i get commuting back and forth to work in the summer with no idling and no 4x4/locked hubs....it just doesnt seem so far fetched to me considering the conditions from what we are being told...that's all
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 08:50 PM
  #23  
LivingLarge's Avatar
LivingLarge
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,410
Likes: 6
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by AlaskanEx
You do have me there, but it is empty commuting

With my trailer and truck loaded, lets say it's 5,500 in weight (need to scale it) I know my 3.73 truck can hold O/D on flat ground, but any sort of incline and i'm back in 3rd. This is with a 5-star tune and at 30ft-1,500ft above sea level, not close to the elevation and weight he is seeing. I'm just thinking it's not that far off what I see in my conditions. Now what I will say is I am able to get 8 MPG towing my trailer at 5+ the speed limit in the mountains, that is the same MPG i get commuting back and forth to work in the summer with no idling and no 4x4/locked hubs....it just doesnt seem so far fetched to me considering the conditions from what we are being told...that's all
I think your going to be surprised to find out that the little trailer you have only weighs about 550lbs with 2 feet of snow on top
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 7, 2015 | 09:59 PM
  #24  
repo_man's Avatar
repo_man
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 4
From: NOVA, for now
Originally Posted by ExxWhy
On my stock size wheels and tires, I am just under 2200 @ 65 MPH in OD. When I had 3.73 gears it was a bit under 1900. If you are around 2000-2100 then you would have 4.10 gears.

4.10 came on pickup trucks and 5.4 EX rigs, but as far as I know it was not an option for a V10 EX. Perhaps the PO got a rear axle cheap from a truck with 4.10 ratio and then changed the front to match. That would explain the tags. Changing to 4.30 gears from 3.73 didn't change my towing mileage, just made the drive-ability much better.

Regardless, that doesn't explain your poor mileage. A good part of that is staying in 3rd gear drinks more fuel. But you should have been able to stay in OD on the level spots. Seems like you are down on power. An 8000 lb trailer should not be too much for your truck, especially with an aero nose on the trailer which definitely helps. Towing my flat fronted brick that weighs 7000 lbs, I never get less than 8, and usually 9+. That includes travel all over Wyoming with it.

Have you checked for codes? Does it seem to run properly, smooth in all gears etc? Possible intermittent misfire? I'd also change the PCV valve, cheap and easy.
In 3rd, I'm at about 2600rpm at 60 mph, about 2200 in 3rd at 50mph. In OD, I was at about 1800 rpm at 60 and about 1550 rpm at 50mph. Yeah I'll probably change the PCV valve also while I'm here.

Originally Posted by ExxWhy
That 6 MPG is in the dead of Alaska winter locked in 4WD and hours of idling per tank.

5.5 on the highway towing what the OP has for a trailer tells me something is fishy. So does not being able to hold OD on level ground.

When I had 3.73 gears, I could hold OD @ 65-70 on flat ground towing with no problem. It wanted to hunt gears @ 55-60.
Yeah the 5.5mpg was constantly moving and quite a few grades around 4500 rpm. most of this was at elevations on 3000-5000ft above sea level and a lot of decently steep grades of 5-7% IIRC for a cpl mins at a time at least. I know altitude can result in power loss but I thought what I experienced was a bit much. It wouldn't go into OD at all unless i was going downhill. As soon as the road became level again, it would go to 3rd.

Originally Posted by harley4jcs
I'm glad Alaskan X saw this thread, I was going to tell you about him AND HIS PLATES. They read 8MPG That's his hand calculated daily driver average !!
You have totally lost me in your eureka moment BUT I will say this: If your rear tag reads 4:10 & the front reads 3:73 you dang better really find out what's you got in them pumpkin's
my Eureka moment was that I put a mark on the tire and the rear driveshaft and counted how many rotations the drive shaft turned to 1 rotation of the tire. 3 3/4 rotations of the drive shaft to 1 tire rotation told me that it has 3.73's. We tested 4wd before we bought it so I know both axles have the same ratios. I agree if they didn't, that'd be ugly for sure!
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2015 | 08:30 AM
  #25  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
If the unloaded drivability of your EX seems healthy with no codes and smooth running and shifting I think the mixture of load, terrain, altitude and speed all add up to the end result of that 5.5 MPG run. Pulling a little heavier trailer at slightly lower speeds (60 to 65) on flatter terrain at lower elevations I saw as low as 6.5 MPG. Seems legit to me. With the exception of the weight every other aspect of Repo's trip conditions compared to mine will result in a decrease in MPGs. I use an Ultra-Gauge UltraGauge OBDII Scan tool & Information Center to monitor the instant MPGs (along with several other parameters) and when it is in 3rd vs OD the instant MPGs drop considerably depending on load, speed, etc. I attribute the better MPGs I am seeing mainly to staying in OD more. Gears move the RPMs up into a better power output range, the headers help to make a bit more power (even better at those higher revs) and whatever extra umph the tunes offer add to the mix (along with much better trans strategies) of increased power output that allows the truck to hold onto OD under higher loads. The more time spent in OD, the better the trip MPGs will be. Any change you can make to the truck to move in this direction will be a plus as well as any changes to the trip conditions that allow for more OD time.
If this EX is to be a more or less dedicated tow rig (less of a daily driver) then I would recommend 4.56 gears with stock sized (or 285.75R16E) rubber. This change alone will deliver a much improved towing experience for you. If it is going to do of a mix of towing and DD duties then 4.30 gears may be a better choice for the slightly better MPG potential while unloaded.
I would also suggest getting some sort of tool to display the instant (and trip) MPGs to monitor during tow trips, it's interesting to see how throttle openings can be reduced a few percent to boost MPGs while maintaining the same speed at times.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2015 | 12:01 PM
  #26  
repo_man's Avatar
repo_man
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 4
From: NOVA, for now
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
If the unloaded drivability of your EX seems healthy with no codes and smooth running and shifting I think the mixture of load, terrain, altitude and speed all add up to the end result of that 5.5 MPG run. Pulling a little heavier trailer at slightly lower speeds (60 to 65) on flatter terrain at lower elevations I saw as low as 6.5 MPG. Seems legit to me. With the exception of the weight every other aspect of Repo's trip conditions compared to mine will result in a decrease in MPGs. I use an Ultra-Gauge UltraGauge OBDII Scan tool & Information Center to monitor the instant MPGs (along with several other parameters) and when it is in 3rd vs OD the instant MPGs drop considerably depending on load, speed, etc. I attribute the better MPGs I am seeing mainly to staying in OD more. Gears move the RPMs up into a better power output range, the headers help to make a bit more power (even better at those higher revs) and whatever extra umph the tunes offer add to the mix (along with much better trans strategies) of increased power output that allows the truck to hold onto OD under higher loads. The more time spent in OD, the better the trip MPGs will be. Any change you can make to the truck to move in this direction will be a plus as well as any changes to the trip conditions that allow for more OD time.
If this EX is to be a more or less dedicated tow rig (less of a daily driver) then I would recommend 4.56 gears with stock sized (or 285.75R16E) rubber. This change alone will deliver a much improved towing experience for you. If it is going to do of a mix of towing and DD duties then 4.30 gears may be a better choice for the slightly better MPG potential while unloaded.
I would also suggest getting some sort of tool to display the instant (and trip) MPGs to monitor during tow trips, it's interesting to see how throttle openings can be reduced a few percent to boost MPGs while maintaining the same speed at times.
Unloaded drivability seems fine. It runs nice and smooth except when I have the a/c on. When the a/c's are on, it seems like there is slight I don't want to say miss because it's not even that pronounced. Not sure if that is normal for the v10's or not now that I think about it. With a/'s off though, it's super smooth. Again, with the a/c's on, what I'm talking about isn't that noticeable at all. And it's only at idle, nothing noted at any other rpm range, super smooth no matter what. 4.56's sound better based on what you described because the X won't be a DD, just a mule. That Ultragauge looks pretty cool. I'll definatly look a that. Are you able access the trans temp on yours? It said in the site that it's possible to access it so i was just wondering. I haven't had a chance to pull codes yet, maybe this weekend.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2015 | 02:01 PM
  #27  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
My UG is a previous model to the current version but I don't think they ever included the Ford trans temp PID to their software. They had promised it in a future release, then that came and went (twice I think) without it happening. I use a stand alone GlowShift MaxTow gauge to watch the trans temps. GlowShift | MaxTow Double Vision Trans Temp Gauge with Electronic Temperature Sensor There are some great apps that work with phones and tablets using Bluetooth dongles that read all of the OBD outputs if you want to go that way.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2015 | 05:05 PM
  #28  
repo_man's Avatar
repo_man
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 4
From: NOVA, for now
Cool, thanks. Is that slight roughness that I mentioned with the a/c's on normal for the X's?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2015 | 05:39 PM
  #29  
LivingLarge's Avatar
LivingLarge
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 26,410
Likes: 6
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by repo_man
Cool, thanks. Is that slight roughness that I mentioned with the a/c's on normal for the X's?
No that's not normal
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2015 | 07:01 AM
  #30  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by repo_man
Cool, thanks. Is that slight roughness that I mentioned with the a/c's on normal for the X's?
Originally Posted by LivingLarge
No that's not normal

I agree, not normal.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE