347 Stroker How reliable?
347 Stroker How reliable?
Hey guys. I'm trying to decide on what kind of performance engine to buy/ build. Now, I want either a 302, or a 302 based stroker. I don't want to swap to a 351 or a big block. I love the idea of the 347, but I don't know anyone who has had one. So, has anyone had any experience wiht these things? If you have one, how many miles does it have on it and so forth. I will be putting this in my 79 flareside and would like a little more torque than is available with the 302. Thanks in advance.
347 Stroker How reliable?
The 347 stroker will last a long happy life as long as the machine work is good and you take your time assembling it right.
Just be sure the block, all parts and the area your working in is very clean and double and triple check your bearing clearances.
I do suggest file fit rings as well that way you know that the gaps are spot on and not too wide causing exessive blowby and not too small causing butting. Use plenty of assembly lube throughout.
This goes for any shortblock, stroker or not.
Just be sure the block, all parts and the area your working in is very clean and double and triple check your bearing clearances.
I do suggest file fit rings as well that way you know that the gaps are spot on and not too wide causing exessive blowby and not too small causing butting. Use plenty of assembly lube throughout.
This goes for any shortblock, stroker or not.
347 Stroker How reliable?
you'd have to ask FRPP, they're really tough about not giving out information unless you drag it out of them.
A side note: I really think that a 351W would suit you best. I know you don't want to do that, but you can build one for a whole heck of a lot less $$$, and it will last SO much longer than a 347 will. The 351 has Cleveland mains, which are much beefier, and everything except your intake, distributor, oil pump, and pushrods will swap right over. You will have to change your exhaust geometry a bit to match the slightly wider top end, but you will be so happy in 50,000 miles when you're still truckin' hard instead of consuming a quart of 20w-50 every 100 miles. Here's another idea: you can take a stroker crank to a 351W (3.85" stroke) and have a 393 Windsor, and still have better rod geometry than a 347. I've talked to many people who have had 347's, and not a single person had one that lasted 50,000 miles or more. I realize that they have corrected (or at least improved upon) the old 347 design, but the 8.2" deck motor is just not as good of a platform for a bigger stroke like the 9.5" deck 351 is. Many people have build 347's successfully and made wild power, but they live on the track, not the interstate. A 351 with a stock stroke will make more power and last much much longer. TK
A side note: I really think that a 351W would suit you best. I know you don't want to do that, but you can build one for a whole heck of a lot less $$$, and it will last SO much longer than a 347 will. The 351 has Cleveland mains, which are much beefier, and everything except your intake, distributor, oil pump, and pushrods will swap right over. You will have to change your exhaust geometry a bit to match the slightly wider top end, but you will be so happy in 50,000 miles when you're still truckin' hard instead of consuming a quart of 20w-50 every 100 miles. Here's another idea: you can take a stroker crank to a 351W (3.85" stroke) and have a 393 Windsor, and still have better rod geometry than a 347. I've talked to many people who have had 347's, and not a single person had one that lasted 50,000 miles or more. I realize that they have corrected (or at least improved upon) the old 347 design, but the 8.2" deck motor is just not as good of a platform for a bigger stroke like the 9.5" deck 351 is. Many people have build 347's successfully and made wild power, but they live on the track, not the interstate. A 351 with a stock stroke will make more power and last much much longer. TK
347 Stroker How reliable?
Thanks TK. That's what I was wanting to know. I have a set of headers for a 302 (long tube type). Can I make these work on the 351? What about my tranny, it's a C6, anything need to be changed in it?
347 Stroker How reliable?
There are two C6 bolt patterns. One for the small block and one for the 460 which was also used on the 351m/400's.
If you have the small bolt pattern it will bolt right up no problems.
If you have the small bolt pattern it will bolt right up no problems.
Trending Topics
347 Stroker How reliable?
I not claiming to be a expert but as tk said the 351 is better choice. The 351 block is better built. I know that you can get 408ci stroker kits and even 427ci kits. Although the 331 or 347 strokers do offer plenty of torque. I would love to have 347 in a mustang, but 351 strokers kits offer the best bang for the buck. It all depends on the power that you want.
347 Stroker How reliable?
Okay, you guys have convinced me about the 351. What I was wondering about was the internals of the tranny. Converter, stuff like that. Does it need to be cahanged to work with the 351? Now I have to decide whether or not to stroke the thing.
347 Stroker How reliable?
go to this site and read up on it. should help you answer alot of your questions
http://www.fast351.com/tech/351w.htm
http://www.fast351.com/tech/351w.htm
347 Stroker How reliable?
What year is the original 302? If it is a 78 or earlier then the flywheel is the same for both motors. After 78-79 the 302 went to a 50oz. balance while the 351W stayed the same at 28oz.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F-250 WARHORSE
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
Jan 22, 2016 05:50 PM
706offroad
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Jan 11, 2016 06:18 PM
ford347stroker
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jan 31, 2014 12:05 AM
fairlaniac
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Dec 28, 2001 10:04 AM





