LSPI = Low Speed Pre-Ignition - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Go Back  Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Misc. > Oil & Lubrication
Reload this Page >

LSPI = Low Speed Pre-Ignition

Notices
Oil & Lubrication  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LSPI = Low Speed Pre-Ignition

Reply

 
 
 
  #1  
Old 04-18-2015, 12:18 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
LSPI = Low Speed Pre-Ignition

GDI = Gas Direct Injection & TGDI = Turbo Gas Direct Injection engines with some age are showing Low Speed Pre-Ignition problems that can be traced to oil type & recipe problems.
Oil vapors, deposits ect in the ring land area at the piston edges can cause pre-ignition when the engine is under a heavy load, especially gdi turbo engines that are lugged at low speed. This has been reported to have been so bad in some cases as to have collapsed the ring lands.
Lubes with high calcium additive content are thought to be more at risk for LSPI. A heads up informative read on some findings here, for those with this kind of power plant.. Page 43 - Fuels & Lubes International 2013 - Quarter 3
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:08 PM
cparks
cparks is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Linden USA
Posts: 475
cparks is starting off with a positive reputation.
This can also be called Super Knock. It seems various things are contributing to this problem and most likely that is based on engine design. Excess fuel in engine oil, low tension rings letting oil slip by into cylinder, etc. Then you have this oil igniting. On some of the newer engines they are not totally solving this problem, but are at least working to have only one knock happen, instead of numerous ones during each power stroke.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2015, 08:08 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
Bump

More LSPI input from Infineum, with some engine damage photos, Investigating low speed pre-ignition
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2016, 08:58 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
Chevron/Oronite LSPI Input

More LSPI input from Chevron/Oronite. https://www.oronite.com/products/lspi.asp
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2016, 09:06 AM
cb_13's Avatar
cb_13
cb_13 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: St James, Missouri
Posts: 987
cb_13 has a very good reputation on FTE.cb_13 has a very good reputation on FTE.cb_13 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Q: Could you address operators of GDI-Turbo vehicles regarding the effects of certain additives such as calcium and their impact on LSPI (low speed pre-ignition)? There's much discussion and concern by operators of these vehicles that Pennzoil's additive packages are predisposed to LSPI as compared to other brands.

A: Low speed pre-ignition (LSPI) is more a phenomenon of engine design – and as you mentioned, occurs more frequently in gasoline direct injection (GDI) turbocharged engines. It is really a phenomenon for prototype or experimental engines that are still in the Research & Development phase, and oils with high levels of calcium-based detergents can increase LSPI frequency. HOWEVER, by the time the engine is fully designed and released to the market, it must be compatible with the available motor oils in the marketplace. Thus said, there is no need for concern.

Posted on Bob is the Oil Guy in a question and answer session with Pennzoil engineers.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2016, 11:08 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
Bump: SouthWest-Research Institute LSPI Input

http://www.api.org/~/media/Files/Cer...look.pdf?la=en

More interesting data input from respected SwRI on high calcium loaded lubes showing more instances of LSPI, in slide 8.
Note that the graph shows higher LSPI events for higher calcium loaded engine oils, than magnesium loaded recipes.

SO, those with GDI, or TGDI engines, would be wise to consider using engine oils with a Lower dose of calcium in their recipes, to try & avoid the type of expensive & unpredictable LSPI event & resultant engine damage it can cause, like shown in slide 7.

The LSPI event is sorta like spark knock, in that its a pre ignition heat caused event, but its different in that it occurs in a different area of the combustion chamber & for different condition reasons.
Because of engine design & operation differences, the combustion chamber pressures on GDI=Gas Direct Injection & TGDI=Turbo Gas Direct Injection engines is much greater, so when the unpredictable LSPI event occurs, it puts Way more pressure on things than a port fuel injected spark knock engine would normally see.

So LSPI events have produced collapsed piston ring lands & other serious combustion chamber damage, as noted in other studies.

Yes TGDI engines that are lugged at low speed are more prone to LSPI, but that hasn't been the only operating condition that'll produce the problem.

At this point LSPI is not Fully understood, but some really good research by a number of well respected industry folks, have shown, like in slide 8, that high calcium loaded lubes, with calcium above 0.15%, would be wise to avoid right now.
Its our engine, so we can choose to use what ever we like, but we have to warranty our choices, so consider choosing wisely, based on the latest data inputs!!!!

The upcoming GF-6 lubes will take all of this info into consideration in their recipes, but those lubes are a year or two away, but some lube blenders recognizing the latest research findings, are already changing/lowering % calcium content. So Much lower calcium content recipes are Now available to us & we can research some of the latest VOA = Virgin Oil Analysis findings at PQIA = Petroleum Quality Institute Of America, here. The Petroleum Quality Institute of America
,A bunch more thoughts for consideration.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-18-2016, 07:49 AM
Bob_T
Bob_T is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 536
Bob_T is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Originally Posted by cb_13 View Post

...<snip>Low speed pre-ignition (LSPI) is more a phenomenon of engine design and as you mentioned, occurs more frequently in gasoline direct injection (GDI) turbocharged engines. It is really a phenomenon for prototype or experimental engines that are still in the Research & Development phase, and oils with high levels of calcium-based detergents can increase LSPI frequency. HOWEVER, by the time the engine is fully designed and released to the market, it must be compatible with the available motor oils in the marketplace. Thus said, there is no need for concern.

Posted on Bob is the Oil Guy in a question and answer session with Pennzoil engineers.
Engine design and lube requirements are a two way street and of course engine designers have to keep one eye solidly on available oil technology but lubricant manufacturers also have to provide updated lubricants that meet the evolving requirements of new engine designs. The new API CK-4 and FA-4 Diesel engine oil standards are perfect examples.

The LSPI issue is a problem to be solved by all concerned, it's not just a laboratory experimental prototype engine design issue. Those prototype engines will soon be in our cars and trucks.

If there's to be no need for concern it's because the oil and engine manufacturers will take the bull by the horns and work through the problems together.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-16-2016, 08:33 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
More LSPI info for consideration. LSPI: A knock on the newest engines | F+L Asia -F+L Asia
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-06-2016, 08:33 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
BUMP:

More GDI & PFI engine deposit loading tests. http://www.pecj.or.jp/japanese/overs...rence12-19.pdf
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2017, 03:02 PM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
Quenching Low Speed Pre-Ignition

More interesting LSPI input from Infineum. Quenching low-speed pre-ignition
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-04-2018, 08:50 AM
pawpaw
pawpaw is online now
Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SW Va
Posts: 12,100
pawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to beholdpawpaw is a splendid one to behold
SN+ motor oil licensing date has finally been agreed upon & will begin May-1-2018.
EDIT: The donut will look like the one in this article https://noln.net/2018/04/01/on-the-c...gf-6-and-more/

SO, those of us with GDI = Gas Direct Injection, or TGDI = Turbo Gas Direct Injection engines can find a new ILSAC SN+ logo on our oil container & be assured these lubes additive packages will address the LSPI = Low Speed Pre-Ignition problems, that earlier high = greater than 2000ppm calcium detergent containing SN recipe engine oils, that were found to be causing LSPI events, are now Way less likely to occur, IF we are wise & choose a low calcium containing engine oil recipe. We can visit PQIA = Petroleum Quality Institute Of America here PQIA PCMO Sample Summary List to scroll down the list to find & click on the name of the lube we're using, or want to use & that'll open a VOA = Virgin Oil Analysis test of the lube in question, then look for it's Ca test results. We would be wise to choose a lube with less than 2000ppm Ca & it's been suggested a recipe with less than 1500ppm Ca should be used in TGDI, or GDI engines.
Many lube marketers have been lowering their lube Ca content over the past two years or so, such that we may find our lube choice is already meeting the new SN+ recipe. This SN+ is going to be part of the much delayed ILSAC GF-6 roll out, that's now not expected to happen until 2020. Yup GF-6 will be at least 4 years behind scheduled roll out. It was to have been in place for the new GDI & TGDI engines that began hitting the market in larger numbers earlier this decade, but the testing for these new oils wasn't in place & has taken Much longer than expected to develop. All of the GF-6 tests have about been finished & tested, so maybe the 2020 roll out date can be met? Anyway we now have SN+ that'll address the LSPI problem & the OEM's were adamant about getting the LSPI problem addressed in the interim.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CPB1
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
6
06-25-2017 04:06 PM
moltman
2015+ F150
21
05-26-2017 01:44 PM
Richard Meadows
EcoBoost (all engine sizes)
4
02-10-2017 08:51 AM
DieselCamper
General Automotive Discussion
9
10-04-2016 12:49 PM
SidecarFlip
Transit Connect
24
04-17-2016 08:50 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: LSPI = Low Speed Pre-Ignition


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.