1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Remove stock Engine Mounts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-15-2015, 06:38 PM
polarspeed's Avatar
polarspeed
polarspeed is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Remove stock Engine Mounts?

Hello Guys,

I am ready to do my engine swap and I realized that the idler pulley for my serpentine belt will not clear the 1951 F1 stock V8 engine mount. Can this bracket be removed without messing up the strength of the frame? Can I cut it and then brace it another way? Pictures would be helpful.

It is a 1998 Ford 5.0 from an explorer. I has the tubular after market engine mount to hold the 5.0. It is bolted to the frame rails with gr 8 bolts.

The transmission crossmember is also cut with a tubular cross member bolted below the frame rails.

I am keeping the stock front axle and will be installing the CPP underfloor mount power dual master cylinder with disc brakes in the front and drums on the back.

Any other information that you need to provide advice, please let me know.

Thanks for everything...

Steve
 
  #2  
Old 03-15-2015, 06:42 PM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
You can go ahead and remove the two boomerang mounts.
 
  #3  
Old 03-15-2015, 07:01 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
What will be left to keep the frame rails square? Nothing but the front crossmember under the radiator. Can't you just notch it a little?
 
  #4  
Old 03-16-2015, 09:08 PM
polarspeed's Avatar
polarspeed
polarspeed is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AXracer and Ross,

You have just demonstrated the repeating dialogue that is going on in my head. I bounce between just removing them (cleaner) to just cutting away the metal in the way (less attractive). I was hoping for a tie-breaker. The front crossmember looks very broad and attached in a number of places that I would suspect would be enough to keep the frame from forming either a flat or twisted non-square parallelogram. Any experiences, either way, with this setup? Any known catastrophic failures?

Thanks again,
Steve
 
  #5  
Old 03-16-2015, 09:25 PM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
We took Gary's out to make room for his 4.6 mod motor. The front crossmember, all the rest of the crossmembers and cab is way more than enough to keep the frame square IMHO. Not going off roading or pushing over trees with it, so there is little stress trying to diamond the frame. If you are putting in a lot of HP/going drag racing then we need to start a new discussion.
 
  #6  
Old 03-16-2015, 09:31 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
How big is the interference? Is there an alternative to cutting, like raising the engine a bit? Or moving it back a ways? A different serpentine system?

There are (were) three pieces that each provided major resistance to "diamonding" or twist on the frame; the front crossmember/engine supports, the trans crossmember, and the one over the rear axle. The trans crossmember is the stoutest by far, but it's gone. The front crossmember only resists diamonding because of the engine supports. Your new engine support and trans support don't add back any significant triangulation.
 
  #7  
Old 03-16-2015, 09:38 PM
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
bobbytnm is offline
Roast em' if you got 'em
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 19,548
Received 3,831 Likes on 1,833 Posts
Right or wrong, I took them out of my 49 when I dropped in my Caddy engine. I also boxed the front half (well more like 1/3) of the frame.


I haven't noticed any diamonding (is that a word?) of the frame but then, I'm not sure if I would.


My big Caddy does make quite a bit of torque and I do get a fair amount of frame twist when I hammer on it (even with the boxing plates). I don't think the original boomerang engine mounts would effect the twisting of the frame much.


I say, drill out the rivets and get rid of the interference.


Bobby
 
  #8  
Old 04-11-2015, 08:37 PM
polarspeed's Avatar
polarspeed
polarspeed is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Solution!

What do you guys think?


I removed a section of the boomerang, then fabricated 1/8" boxing plates to firm up the strength of the boomerang!




 

Last edited by polarspeed; 04-12-2015 at 11:07 AM. Reason: To clarify
  #9  
Old 04-11-2015, 09:12 PM
drptop70ss's Avatar
drptop70ss
drptop70ss is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: in a barn
Posts: 2,577
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
I would knock the rivets out and toss them. The front crossmember along with the new engine crossmember is more than enough to keep things in line.
 
  #10  
Old 04-11-2015, 10:10 PM
polarspeed's Avatar
polarspeed
polarspeed is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by drptop70ss
I would knock the rivets out and toss them. The front crossmember along with the new engine crossmember is more than enough to keep things in line.
I heard that but I thought that I would be creative and keep the brackets. I cut the space to clear my serpentine pulleys and then boxed in the remaining steel. I really like how it looks and it keeps a bit of the history intact.

Thanks, Steve
 
  #11  
Old 04-12-2015, 08:53 AM
toby tough's Avatar
toby tough
toby tough is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Clitherall, MN.
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not being well versed in such things, it looks to be a substantial amount of support you would be removing. I also would look to move the engine around to make it work. Or put some sort of bracing back in afterwards. Just my uneducated 2.
 
  #12  
Old 04-12-2015, 11:09 AM
polarspeed's Avatar
polarspeed
polarspeed is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by toby tough
Not being well versed in such things, it looks to be a substantial amount of support you would be removing. I also would look to move the engine around to make it work. Or put some sort of bracing back in afterwards. Just my uneducated 2.
I have already cut out a portion of the boomerang and added back the boxing plate for strength. I guess it was not clear in the pictures.
 
  #13  
Old 04-12-2015, 12:03 PM
drptop70ss's Avatar
drptop70ss
drptop70ss is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: in a barn
Posts: 2,577
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by polarspeed
I heard that but I thought that I would be creative and keep the brackets. I cut the space to clear my serpentine pulleys and then boxed in the remaining steel. I really like how it looks and it keeps a bit of the history intact.

Thanks, Steve
If you like it that is all that matters, the fun part of hot rodding is adding your own touch to the build.
Good luck!
 
  #14  
Old 04-12-2015, 12:47 PM
gerrymoe's Avatar
gerrymoe
gerrymoe is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Madera Ranchos
Posts: 765
Received 61 Likes on 41 Posts
With those mods it looks like everything will be stuffed in there pretty tight. I would ask how is the ease of removing motor, and any engine part while motor is in, exhaust manifolds alternator spark plugs power steering pump.
 
  #15  
Old 04-12-2015, 01:08 PM
polarspeed's Avatar
polarspeed
polarspeed is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gerrymoe
With those mods it looks like everything will be stuffed in there pretty tight. I would ask how is the ease of removing motor, and any engine part while motor is in, exhaust manifolds alternator spark plugs power steering pump.
This is an engine swap project. It had a 1968 302 in there that needed to be replaced. The engine mount worked well, but there was interference with the boomerangs. The only mod that I made was to increase clearances around the boomerangs.

I received opinions that ranged from "you don't need them and cut them out" to "your frame is going to diamond or taco and you will need to reinforce that structural element." I went with a middle ground approach. Cut out the section that is in the way and make it strong.

The fit is rather tight especially around the stock steering box and the headers. Otherwise, I didn't have any problems with general maintenance access to make repairs. It should be easier now.

Thanks for your comments.

Steve
 


Quick Reply: Remove stock Engine Mounts?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 PM.