Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Problems mounting OEM bed rails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2015 | 02:26 AM
  #1  
mavericore's Avatar
mavericore
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, CA
Problems mounting OEM bed rails

Hey everyone,
My 72 f100 long bed needed some rails. So, I recently purchased a complete set of OEM bed rails with all the mounting hardware... on eBay (and probably over paid a bit ). I went to mount them up today aaaand the mounting nuts, that should link up under the bed walls, are too long (in especially the middle of the bed). It looks like the support brackets on the inside of the bed are restricting access to the mounting nuts and I'm stuck. Anybody know how to work around this? through this? fix this? Are there, maybe, other mounting hardware I should be using?
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2015 | 06:12 AM
  #2  
CougarJohn's Avatar
CougarJohn
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 4
From: Cupertino
I will give it a shot.
I believe you have a problem with long 1/4-20s interfering.
Figure out what length you need, run a die down the bolt until the amount you wish to cut off protrudes, vise up the die and hacksaw off excess. That way you get a bolt of proper length with a good thread. The die will cut thread on the way off.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2015 | 12:04 PM
  #3  
RichS2659's Avatar
RichS2659
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 249
From: North Pole, Alaska
John, for a 1/4-20 bolt, it is even easier to just use two 1/4-20 nuts as the threading die. Spin them on and just work them off. Used them all the time as an electrician.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2015 | 10:05 PM
  #4  
mavericore's Avatar
mavericore
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, CA
Ok, Hopefully these pictures help to see what I'm talking about.

This is as far as I can get it in (in the middle pockets as well as the front):



Here's the mounting nuts and plastic gasket to the side and how well they should be fitting together:



Here you can see the nuts just wont fit at all:



On the middle and front , these pockets are whats blocking access:



This is how they should fit. As you can see they fit perfectly on the rear:




PLEASE HELP! I'm really lost here. Do I need a different mount hardware? Do I need to remove the pocket brackets on the inside of the bed? Did I purchase the wrong thing?
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2015 | 11:26 PM
  #5  
Red Mercury's Avatar
Red Mercury
Tuned
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 387
Likes: 25
Those particular rails were not available until the late 1970's so they weren't really designed for the the 67-72 beds. Years ago, I took a set of those rails off of my father's 1979 F150 and put them on my 1967 F100 (My dad was a good guy). So, it can be done and they looked perfect, but I just can't remember if the threaded cross bars (mounting nuts) were too long--it may have been necessary to shorten them by grinding the ends. The same rails were also sold for the 1980 and up trucks but the chrome mounting stands were different due to the different contour of the bed. The threaded cross bars and plastic pads may have also been different. Are you certain that the bed rails you bought are for 73-79 trucks and not the later trucks? I see a D9T? part number on one of the plastic pads so they should be the correct parts.

I have made new threaded cross bars before when the originals have been missing, so that is an option too.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 02:18 AM
  #6  
mavericore's Avatar
mavericore
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, CA
Originally Posted by Red Mercury
Those particular rails were not available until the late 1970's so they weren't really designed for the the 67-72 beds. Years ago, I took a set of those rails off of my father's 1979 F150 and put them on my 1967 F100 (My dad was a good guy). So, it can be done and they looked perfect, but I just can't remember if the threaded cross bars (mounting nuts) were too long--it may have been necessary to shorten them by grinding the ends. The same rails were also sold for the 1980 and up trucks but the chrome mounting stands were different due to the different contour of the bed. The threaded cross bars and plastic pads may have also been different. Are you certain that the bed rails you bought are for 73-79 trucks and not the later trucks? I see a D9T? part number on one of the plastic pads so they should be the correct parts.

I have made new threaded cross bars before when the originals have been missing, so that is an option too.
Not exactly sure about the year being right, the listing I bought from was vague but included my year. I searched up the type and found several 72's with the same exact looking type mounted up ( a few of which were members here). So, I assumed a clean buy.

Unless anyone else has any other insight here, I think I'm looking at having to make some new cross bars. The pockets are unobstructed from left to right so I may need to make a few H-shape cross bars, thread them up and see if I can make that work.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 04:08 AM
  #7  
CharlaineC's Avatar
CharlaineC
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Elk
ok so dumb question cant you just turn them 90 degrees? would they not catch that way?
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 11:14 AM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Red Mercury
Those particular rails were not available until the late 1970's so they weren't really designed for the the 67-72 beds.
6 1/2' & 8' Styleside bed rails are the same 1967/91 .. as FoMoCo updated the original part numbers multiple times.

Several years ago, I found a set of NOS bed rails at a dealer in AL with the last updated part number (E7TZ-99322B30-B) for FTE member Phil105. He installed them on his 1970 F100 without a problemo.

And btw, D9TJ-9932242-AB is the Ford ID Engineering Number for the pad, it's not the Ford part number. There are no part numbers marked on parts after 1956.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 01:09 PM
  #9  
mavericore's Avatar
mavericore
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, CA
Originally Posted by CharlaineC
ok so dumb question cant you just turn them 90 degrees? would they not catch that way?
Well, the plastic gaskets have notches for the cross bars which run from the front to back and none from left to right. So turning the gasket would mean that the rail arms would not fit into the gasket as intended and would not be flush. I could run the risk of cutting new notches into the gaskets but would not be able to go back if it did not work out.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 01:18 PM
  #10  
mavericore's Avatar
mavericore
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, CA
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
6 1/2' & 8' Styleside bed rails are the same 1967/91 .. as FoMoCo updated the original part numbers multiple times.

Several years ago, I found a set of NOS bed rails at a dealer in AL with the last updated part number (E7TZ-99322B30-B) for FTE member Phil105. He installed them on his 1970 F100 without a problemo.

And btw, D9TJ-9932242-AB is the Ford ID Engineering Number for the pad, it's not the Ford part number. There are no part numbers marked on parts after 1956.
The ones you found for phil were the same exact type mounting? Or is there a a different type I'm unaware of? Maybe I'm doing this wrong or not thinking of some sort of easy solution. Without having to fabricate a different type of cross bar or cutting holes in the gaskets from left to right, the only way I see this working is stretching out the pockets walls and I don't know if that will effect the integrity of the bed walls.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
It's so obvious I'm surprised the so-called expert didn't catch it.

The rails might be the same but what about the mounting system? That part has a "D3TJ-" cast on it and yer attempting to install it on a Bumpside. It would be a relatively safe assumption that the mounting system is intended for Dents......

I've got a Dent and two Bumps. A real-life, real-world, non-MPC comparison indicates the pockets on the Dent are physically wider fore and aft. The only pocket on a Bump with the same clearance is the rear-most on my longbeds. The middle and forward pockets are narrower... the fore and aft "walls" are nearly the same width as the pocket.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 03:29 PM
  #12  
mavericore's Avatar
mavericore
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, CA
Originally Posted by HIO Silver
It's so obvious I'm surprised the so-called expert didn't catch it.

The rails might be the same but what about the mounting system? That part has a "D3TJ-" cast on it and yer attempting to install it on a Bumpside. It would be a relatively safe assumption that the mounting system is intended for Dents......

I've got a Dent and two Bumps. A real-life, real-world, non-MPC comparison indicates the pockets on the Dent are physically wider fore and aft. The only pocket on a Bump with the same clearance is the rear-most on my longbeds. The middle and forward pockets are narrower... the fore and aft "walls" are nearly the same width as the pocket.
Alright so if I have the wrong mounting hardware: any feasible solution for mounting to my bump? Or am I just kind of screwed?
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 03:48 PM
  #13  
Randle's Avatar
Randle
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 4
From: Western Kentucky
Some of the after market rails used to use a toggle bolt in the standard holes. That way they could be used on about any truck.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 04:01 PM
  #14  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by mavericore
Alright so if I have the wrong mounting hardware: any feasible solution for mounting to my bump? Or am I just kind of screwed?
Screwed... at least using those catches.

But all is not lost. Fab up some different mounts using the same principle... maybe some else in here can provide pics and dimensions of bump-specific brackets.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #15  
Red Mercury's Avatar
Red Mercury
Tuned
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 387
Likes: 25
I tried to edit my other post and it didn't work the way I expected--sorry everyone! You're smart people, you'll sort it out.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE