When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
With all that frontal area I think you are going to have a lot of difficulty getting the truck above 130 with 340HP unless you push it off the top of a high cliff.
I totally agree with the hood flying up statement! That's a big issue in my opinion ,I have taken my 56 for the old time drags and I drilled a hole in the hood latch and hood so I can bolt the hood down when I run down the track
Hey RS,
Hmmm... We've got a '50 F1 with 400hp. I wouldn't dream of
going 130mph. Above 70mph it starts to make all kinds of interesting fatal sounding noises - no thanks - We happily cruise at 65mph. How well do your doors latch? My passenger door will open itself whenever it wants.
You Illinois guys walk on the wild side. Post some pics of your truck I'd like to see it.
With all that frontal area I think you are going to have a lot of difficulty getting the truck above 130 with 340HP unless you push it off the top of a high cliff.
Ok, for all you "cliff" guys. I did some research on drag, HP, and top speed. Here is what I found. No specific data on the exact drag coefficient of the f1, however I looked at a couple of the worst vehicles in the list: (1) Ford ranger Cd=0.49 Frontal Area=25.9 (2) Worst I could find was a soft top Jeep vehicle Cd=0.58 Area=28.37.
I found a formula for top speed based on these two figures and HP (assuming you can match peak engine HP with desired top speed-which I can with the 5-speed). I used Cd of 0.58 and a Frontal area of 30 (worse than the jeep). Results: Top speed 143MPH
The formula is (53.26) X The cube root of (HP/ (Cd x A) If any of you have some more or better information or data, I am all ears. Bob
The downfall of you calculation is it is theoretical maximum speed given an infinite distance for acceleration. Unless you plan on running the long course at Bonneville, it is unlikely you will ever approach the max theoretical speed in the real world since the rate of acceleration drops off exponentially.
Hi Bob,
These are really old trucks - I know how mine is put together -
the best we could do but definitely not ISO-9001 certified.
Our F1 speed expert is Arrowheadfred from down in Florida.
Here are a couple of links - I think there is a video of his 110mph somewhere too (He was crazy enough to video the speedometer).
His name is Dale not Fred.
The downfall of you calculation is it is theoretical maximum speed given an infinite distance for acceleration. Unless you plan on running the long course at Bonneville, it is unlikely you will ever approach the max theoretical speed in the real world since the rate of acceleration drops off exponentially.
I am not saying it will hit a theoretical top speed(even though I am in Illinois), just that it will likely top 130 without being pushed off a cliff. I can't prove it until I get it back from the paint shop, put everything back in, and install the wiring harness, but if 110 mph is your f1 record, I guarantee you that will be shattered. If you have something other than speculation, I am interested. I did my research, and went on the conservative side on drag and frontal area. This is not going to be a fender flapping, door flying open truck.
You're actually not on the conservative side with your numbers. The only sources I could find for Cd listed ('80's - '90's) pickups at "0.6+ "... with west coast mirrors it adds around 0.10. Using a trapezoidal shape for area, 5' wide at the roof and 6 ft wide at the RB's, using 6 ft for height, gives 33 sf. With all the discontinuities along the body I could believe a Cd as high as 0.8. Having the break between front and rear fenders is almost like doubling up. The vertical windshield is a killer.
If you want to try a different approach, a stock F-1 on flat ground and no headwind, with around 75 -80 SAE Net HP topped out around 80 mph. You can probably back into a (Cd x A) value from that.
We had a crazy guy on this forum with a 51 F-1 who routinely posted actual photographs of his truck's speedo running 120-130 mph. AND he had an actual visor hanging out over the windshield.
I remember him and the truck, it was the first thing I thought of when I read this thread.
My buddy and I did 135mph in a 65 Corvette with a 308 gear and it took about 3 miles to get it there. That was the factory speedo, not a radar gun.
I was a 300hp.
A 49 F1 with Boss 5.0 mod motor owned/driven by Stan Fox's CART crew chief Don Basala went 95.008 MPH at 2012 ECTA Willmington, OH standing mile. Top speed on a public hiway doesn't impress me (only as a idiot). Show me a timing slip from Willmington or Bonneville.
You're actually not on the conservative side with your numbers. The only sources I could find for Cd listed ('80's - '90's) pickups at "0.6+ "... with west coast mirrors it adds around 0.10. Using a trapezoidal shape for area, 5' wide at the roof and 6 ft wide at the RB's, using 6 ft for height, gives 33 sf. With all the discontinuities along the body I could believe a Cd as high as 0.8. Having the break between front and rear fenders is almost like doubling up. The vertical windshield is a killer.
If you want to try a different approach, a stock F-1 on flat ground and no headwind, with around 75 -80 SAE Net HP topped out around 80 mph. You can probably back into a (Cd x A) value from that.
Thanks ALBUQ. I ran the numbers backwards using your 80HP and 80MPH figures, and got a CdxA of 14.406. Using this in the formula with 340n HP gives a top speed of 129.6 MPH. Right in the ballpark of what I said it should do. Also my truck is lowered 2" and has smooth panels in place of front and rear bumpers. Both of which would lower the coefficient of drag.