1980 9" rear tag decoding
Sep 10, 2014 | 03:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 5
From: Elizabethtown, Ky.
1980 9" rear tag decoding
As stated I have an 1980 F-100 and it has a 9" rear and the tag stamping is like this.
DM-CL 0C05
75 9 S310B
When I googled decoding a 9" it actually brought me back to this site but in the 87' to 96' truck and some of this looks the same but some didn't so I thought maybe if I checked in this series of truck it might help. Thank you.
Sep 10, 2014 | 03:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
You are missing the first digits, which I think are "W" and "2".
<table style="border-collapse: collapse;" id="table1" border="1" cellSpacing="0" cellPadding="2" width="98%"><tbody><tr><td bgColor="#fae9d1" rowSpan="2">WDM-CL </td><td>Ford F100, F150 Pickup '79 </td><td align="center">2.75 </td><td align="center">9 in </td><td align="center">NL </td><td align="center">28 </td><td align="center">- </td></tr><tr><td>Ford F100, F150 Pickup '80-'82 </td><td align="center">2.75 </td><td align="center">9 in </td><td align="center">NL </td><td align="center">31 </td></tr></tbody></table>
Sep 10, 2014 | 05:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nytling92
As stated I have an 1980 F-100 and it has a 9" rear and the tag stamping is like this.
W DM-CL 0C05 2. 75 9 S310B
WDM-CL = 9" rear axle / 2.75-1 / No Limited Slip.
0C05 = Assembled March (C) 5, 1980 (0).
Sep 10, 2014 | 11:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 5
From: Elizabethtown, Ky.
Thank you both for the replies, it's a pretty plain truck so I figured it wouldn't have anything to special..... but I was hoping.
Sep 13, 2014 | 01:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 456
Likes: 1
From: Owensboro, KY
Unless you have an I6, look for a different set of gears. My 80 had a 302 with those 2.75's. It was fast, but 0-60 was like 3 years or so.
Sep 13, 2014 | 01:48 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ranger80
Unless you have an I6, look for a different set of gears. My 80 had a 302 with those 2.75's. It was fast, but 0-60 was like 3 years or so.
Worst gears ever. Great for MPG's though!
Sep 13, 2014 | 08:42 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 16
From: Lost
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fordzilla80
Worst gears ever. Great for MPG's though!
Not quite. The 2.47 ratio gears take top honors for lousy gearing.
Sep 13, 2014 | 09:18 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 456
Likes: 1
From: Owensboro, KY
Good for mileage yes, but why it wasn't set up with an AOD and 3.55's instead is beyond me.
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Sep 13, 2014 | 12:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,971
Likes: 2,731
From: Virginia
That truck will buzz right along on the interstate at 70-75mph along with all the modern cars and trucks with that gear.
By the way it never fails. When I saw the "75" in your post I guessed it was a "2.75". They always punched the bolt hole into the first digit, wiping it out.
Sep 13, 2014 | 08:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ranger80
Good for mileage yes, but why it wasn't set up with an AOD and 3.55's instead is beyond me.
OP's F100 is a 1980, AOD wasn't available in F100/150 until 1981...and then initially...only w/a 302.
Sep 13, 2014 | 11:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,521
Likes: 16
From: Lost
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NumberDummy
OP's F100 is a 1980, AOD wasn't available in F100/150 until 1981...and then initially...only w/a 302.
On top of that, 3.55 ratio gears weren't offered in a 9", just the 8.8", which didn't come along till 83.........
3.50 gears were, though.......
Sep 14, 2014 | 01:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 5
From: Elizabethtown, Ky.
Franklin2, thanks, I crawled back under and I couldn't find that W or the 2 mentioned earlier but I figured they were right anyways.
I have an AOD and a 302. Haven't decided if I'm going to keep it or change the motor and flip it.
Sep 14, 2014 | 02:50 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nytling92
Franklin2, thanks, I crawled back under and I couldn't find that W or the 2 mentioned earlier but I figured they were right anyways.
I have an AOD
and a 302. Haven't decided if I'm going to keep it or change the motor and flip it.
If you have AOD, your truck is a 1981 or it was swapped in.
AOD introduced in 1980
LTD/Grand Marquis/Town Car/Thunderbird Cougar/Mark VI &
1981 F100/150 302.
Here's the 1980 F100/350 & Bronco (U) A/T application chart. Where is the AOD? No see um.
Attached Images
Sep 15, 2014 | 01:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 456
Likes: 1
From: Owensboro, KY
It was just a thought. They already HAD the AOD in production, why not use it. Gearing was similar to a C4/C6. You'd have the advantage of a lower first gear ratio, and OD I would imagine would keep the revs in the same range as the higher gearing. An AOD with 2.75's though, that's a terrible idea.
Sep 15, 2014 | 01:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 456
Likes: 1
From: Owensboro, KY
Also, I seem to remember coming across a few '80 models with AOD's. Could have been swapped, sure, but I don't always trust the parts catalogs, they have been wrong before. Especially on the 1980 model year.