6.9 bull nose mpg
#1
#2
My '85 F250 4X4 SC when stock with the 6.9 and T19 and 3:55 axles got me 12mpg at best. Now that I have the new drive-train with the ZF I'm getting better, but don't have enough miles on it yet to get an average.
My '84 F250 2X4 SC 6.9 C6 got me a faithful 15mpg.
Those wide, aggressive tires don't help you with mileage, you want to run tall skinny tires for less road restriction and lower RPMs.
But no matter what, you're getting almost twice the mileage of a 460 powered truck so you're still money ahead.
#3
id like to get my hands on a zf tranny so thath the engine aint running at higher rpms i can hear that motor when im going down the road id say its at round 2000-2500 but not for sure dont have a tach. I recently got my truck straight piped so im sure thats helping the mpgs, it better cause its WAY to loud for what i like.
#4
My truck: 1986 F350 6.9L NA Crew Cab Long Bed 4x4, 4.10's stock tires and Gear Vendor .78 overdrive...
17 mpg with gear vendor ON
15 mpg with gear vendor OFF
Does not seem to matter very much what speed I drive, the mpg is very consistent unless heavily loaded it drops to ~12-ish. The above numbers are highway mileage.
Edit: even in overdrive it revs too much, so it is getting a ZF in addition to the GVOD. That and some other mods will hopefully push me towards 20 mpg, but with the quality of diesel fuel declining it may be a mirage that I never reach...
17 mpg with gear vendor ON
15 mpg with gear vendor OFF
Does not seem to matter very much what speed I drive, the mpg is very consistent unless heavily loaded it drops to ~12-ish. The above numbers are highway mileage.
Edit: even in overdrive it revs too much, so it is getting a ZF in addition to the GVOD. That and some other mods will hopefully push me towards 20 mpg, but with the quality of diesel fuel declining it may be a mirage that I never reach...
#5
#6
My 6.9 turbo with 3.55:1 and C6 stockheight and tires gets about 12.5 MPG at 70 MPH. Towing same 5500 lbs it gets 11 MPG but that's losing speed up every hill and dropping to as slow as 35 up longer steeper hills where on the same route the 460 will hold 70 MPH. The 6.9 would benefit from a ZF5 unloaded as best MPG of 14.5 was averaging 40-55 MPH. 5th would be useless towing as it has trouble pulling any incline at 2600 RPM so no way it'll hold speed at 2000 RPM like the 460 does up most modest hills.
Cost per mile is about the same average $.31/mi in past year with the 6.9. That is 8.25/12.08/14.46 as worst/avg/best MPG. It gets the edge as diesel is about the same price as 93 octane but I dump my filtered WMO in the tank so it gets a few gallons on free fuel now and again to bring the average down. Just my experience with MPG on both a 460 and 6.9, hopefully informative.
#7
My 460 truck with 3.55:1 and ZF5 on 35" tires gets 12.5 MPG at 70 MPH unloaded and 10 MPG towing about 5500 lbs at same speed.
My 6.9 turbo with 3.55:1 and C6 stockheight and tires gets about 12.5 MPG at 70 MPH. Towing same 5500 lbs it gets 11 MPG but that's losing speed up every hill and dropping to as slow as 35 up longer steeper hills where on the same route the 460 will hold 70 MPH. The 6.9 would benefit from a ZF5 unloaded as best MPG of 14.5 was averaging 40-55 MPH. 5th would be useless towing as it has trouble pulling any incline at 2600 RPM so no way it'll hold speed at 2000 RPM like the 460 does up most modest hills.
Cost per mile is about the same average $.31/mi in past year with the 6.9. That is 8.25/12.08/14.46 as worst/avg/best MPG. It gets the edge as diesel is about the same price as 93 octane but I dump my filtered WMO in the tank so it gets a few gallons on free fuel now and again to bring the average down. Just my experience with MPG on both a 460 and 6.9, hopefully informative.
My 6.9 turbo with 3.55:1 and C6 stockheight and tires gets about 12.5 MPG at 70 MPH. Towing same 5500 lbs it gets 11 MPG but that's losing speed up every hill and dropping to as slow as 35 up longer steeper hills where on the same route the 460 will hold 70 MPH. The 6.9 would benefit from a ZF5 unloaded as best MPG of 14.5 was averaging 40-55 MPH. 5th would be useless towing as it has trouble pulling any incline at 2600 RPM so no way it'll hold speed at 2000 RPM like the 460 does up most modest hills.
Cost per mile is about the same average $.31/mi in past year with the 6.9. That is 8.25/12.08/14.46 as worst/avg/best MPG. It gets the edge as diesel is about the same price as 93 octane but I dump my filtered WMO in the tank so it gets a few gallons on free fuel now and again to bring the average down. Just my experience with MPG on both a 460 and 6.9, hopefully informative.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Greg5OH
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
15
06-30-2012 02:24 PM
jjoel
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
01-02-2012 06:44 AM
redbug
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
33
05-23-2009 07:20 PM
Blueovals&Blacksmoke
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
12
09-15-2008 07:53 PM