I would think it would be no different than slapping a turbo on a normally aspirated engine. The engine one would prob be higher compression, there wouldn't be a boost sensor to detect the extra air coming in to add fuel under boost, and the timing advance would cause serious issues. I say all that to say this, there will always be issues with trying to do something with an engine its not made for.


Obviously the turbo would damage the engine from leaning it out, plus boosting a higher compression engine and timing advance would be a lethal combination on a na motor. Could one say that a turbo is bad from that, who had tried it?

But if you build the same engine with lower compression, add something like MSD boost control to retard the timing based on per lb of boost, increased the injector size or added a fuel computer, now you have a performance beast. It has to be done correctly to see the results. In my opinion stand alone fuel management is "done correctly" but cost is the reason I didn't do it. So I am using a black box so to speak to modify the factory computer to get fuel & timing maps more compatible with HHO.
I've actually installed/used a few blower applications. It's really quite easy. You tell the PCM (tuning) what fuel maps to use for load/RPM. It then supplies that fuel. You then monitor your A/F ratio via a gauge and fine tune the PCM parameters. No special boost control needed. No special fuel computer needed, maybe new fuel injectors if the stock ones aren't big enough to supply demand...maybe. The PCM just needs a signal to know when boost is applied, or not and to what degree. This is/can be easily done using installed equipment

read up on power adders a bit please. you suggest alot of components that would only be required on a purpose built vehicle. most modern vehicles wouldn't need any of that stuff.