Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

6.7 breakin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 10:44 AM
  #16  
jfralph's Avatar
jfralph
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: SW Montana
Talking

I can't complain about fuel mileage, even at about 15 average mpg, I consistently get 18-19 on the highway emty traveling 75-80 mph. Towing a light trailer (3k#'s) I got 15mpg. On a trip this summer with the fiver, I averaged under 10 towing, but then I drove it like I stole it. Holding 80 mph on the highway whenever I could, even the passes.

My real bitch was my 2003 6.0 was similiar in the power department and I got 23+ mpg going to the second home 300 miles away. I would guess my average of all trips to second home was in the 20+ range. Problem was, I never got to use the truck when I wanted to. It was always in the shop replacing injectors. So, I purchased the 05 and if anyone rememebers fords advertisements from the day, the new upgrades to the 6.0 produced 15% better fuel mileage and power. Now, seat of the pants told me the 05 could not hold a candle to the 03. And, my best trip to the second home was probably 15 mpg, thats empty, babying it and treating it with respect. the best I ever got with that truck was probably 16-17 mpg. New truck has gotten over 18 mpg with regen. Without regen on some tanks on the highway I have been in the low 20's. (Regens suck!!!)

This new truck drives better than the other 2 did, fuel mileage is good, excellent when you consider this truck weighs about 8500#s dressed out. Power from this truck is as good or better than the 03, steering actually is excellent, and brakes are substantially better (although still room for improvement). Now, if it could only still be worth something in a few years other than scrap.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 01:20 PM
  #17  
Romeo Scorpion's Avatar
Romeo Scorpion
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by boatman33
On to the next question. Does the 2012 6.7 hold back during break in? Seems a little slow for 400 hp. It's faster than my old 7.3 but I kind of expected more
My October '11 build 2012 was like a hot rod when I first got it. Tires spun on the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts. But after all the re-flashes by the dealer, the hot rod effect is long gone. Under load though the power hasn't changed a bit. Still pulls the same as it did when new.

It's just not a drag racer anymore.

I miss it, but I can live with it. I'd have a pile of tickets by now if it hadn't changed!
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #18  
bama29fan's Avatar
bama29fan
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 1
From: Opelika, AL
driving style plays the biggest part.

i can drive mine around town and avg around 17. i let my wife drive it around town for the day and it will drop from 17 to 14.

hwy milage is usually around 19

towing around 10-11

and my overall avg for roughly 16,000 miles is 14.9
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 03:39 PM
  #19  
F stock owner's Avatar
F stock owner
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
My lie-o-meter (LCD screen) says I'm getting 17.2 around town (with occasional short highway trips) and 21 all highway, empty, no towing. I use PM22 at every fill-up, I just turned 10K miles and like mikethomas, I have a very light foot (most of the time). Maybe I should do the math manually and see what I'm really getting. Has anyone compared their computer against manual calculations? How much difference were you getting?
----

2012 Lariat CC LB SRW FX4 - 6.7L diesel - All terrain tires - 3.31 e-locker - All weather floor mats - Skid plates - 5th wheel hitch prep package - Heavy-duty 200A alternator - Leather heated/cooled seats - Nav system - Memory group - Remote start - Rear view camera - Reverse sensing system - Trailer tow package - Bilstein 5100 shocks and Bilstein damper - LED interior lighting - LED Brake lights - LED running lights under doors, Amber - LED ground lights, White, - LED DRL's, White - 20" Rigid light bar in bumper - Rigid Dually flood lights, rear.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 03:55 PM
  #20  
jfralph's Avatar
jfralph
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: SW Montana
My lie-09-meter seems to be right on the money with all stock truck, even when running winter tires of slightly different OAD. Any discrepancies I have found typically can be explained by fueling to different stop points.

Just my observations!
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #21  
sdetweil's Avatar
sdetweil
Hotshot
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11,591
Likes: 14
From: Pflugerville, tx
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by F stock owner
My lie-o-meter (LCD screen) says I'm getting 17.2 around town (with occasional short highway trips) and 21 all highway, empty, no towing. I use PM22 at every fill-up, I just turned 10K miles and like mikethomas, I have a very light foot (most of the time). Maybe I should do the math manually and see what I'm really getting. Has anyone compared their computer against manual calculations? How much difference were you getting?
----

.
Mine is off by 1 mpg pretty consistently
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
Hdslider's Avatar
Hdslider
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 0
From: Roll Tide, Roll
Mine is generally .6 to 1.0 off on the high side. I hand calc everyfill.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 06:54 PM
  #23  
sdetweil's Avatar
sdetweil
Hotshot
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11,591
Likes: 14
From: Pflugerville, tx
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Hdslider
Mine is generally .6 to 1.0 off on the high side. I hand calc everyfill.
I have a running total spreadsheet. Per fill, and cumulative.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 08:13 PM
  #24  
kper05's Avatar
kper05
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,600
Likes: 84
Club FTE Silver Member

I used an ABS formula in Excel and if I remember right the computer vs hand was 99.7% on my truck with OEM tires.
I wonder if Ford changed the calculations over time with updates because I thought these were spot on in 2010, 2011.

New tires changed the reliability of the computer though but that's on me.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #25  
TRENT310's Avatar
TRENT310
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 6
From: Whitecourt AB, Canada
I do reset my resettable fuel economy at the start of every trip so I don't really use it for comparison purposes, but I also use spreadsheet formulas to come up with fuel economy numbers assuming the odometer is accurate and that the custody transfer PD flow meter is correct (well it had better!).

Here is what mine looks like as of today:
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 09:27 AM
  #26  
ScottyDog's Avatar
ScottyDog
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: On a Lake in Idaho
Star Date October 2013:
Holy Captain's Log!!!
Way to go ya over achiever, nice records Trent.
I may need to borrow them if I get audited...
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 11:37 AM
  #27  
F stock owner's Avatar
F stock owner
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally Posted by TRENT310
I do reset my resettable fuel economy at the start of every trip so I don't really use it for comparison purposes, but I also use spreadsheet formulas to come up with fuel economy numbers assuming the odometer is accurate and that the custody transfer PD flow meter is correct (well it had better!).

Here is what mine looks like as of today:
With a cursory look and without crunching numbers, it appears your emissions delete made no difference at all in your mileage. Maybe even a little worse. Am I missing something? How is your performance after the delete?
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 02:06 PM
  #28  
2ndStroke's Avatar
2ndStroke
Lead Driver
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,544
Likes: 43
Originally Posted by F stock owner
With a cursory look and without crunching numbers, it appears your emissions delete made no difference at all in your mileage. Maybe even a little worse. Am I missing something? How is your performance after the delete?
Looks like he is burning less litres per 100km to me, I would say that is better.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 03:32 PM
  #29  
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
FTE Emeritus
Originally Posted by F stock owner
With a cursory look and without crunching numbers, it appears your emissions delete made no difference at all in your mileage. Maybe even a little worse. Am I missing something? How is your performance after the delete?
less l/100km is better (like having more mpg)
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 03:37 PM
  #30  
F stock owner's Avatar
F stock owner
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally Posted by 2ndStroke
Looks like he is burning less litres per 100km to me, I would say that is better.
Unless I made a entry error I get a better average after the delete.
Average on 13 data points before delete = 17.33L/100km.
Average on 13 data points after and including delete = 14.58L/100km.
A delta of 2.75L/100km. So I stand corrected. I guess I had my brain in reverse. Sorry 'bout that.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE