When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just wanted to get some real world feedback on this of the brands out there.
What are you running and how does it work for you.
Who has switched from a single to a double stabilizer and what difference did it make.
I'm running some 285/75/16 tires and looking into a new stabilizer, single or dual and wanted to hear some feedback on your set up and brand you are using. I've had stabilizers in the past but its been about a decade since I was familiar with that industry so I am getting myself aquainted again.
My goal on the shocks is to get a 200 psi nitro shocks but it seems the selection is not what it used to be.
Thanks
for any and all replies.
P.S. I used to post here years ago and lost my login/email info
I have Rancho RS-9000's and dual rancho steering stabilizer on my F350 CCSB, while I have Bilstein 5100 shocks on the excursion with a single 5100 steering stabilizer. Steering effort with similar tires, is much easier on the Ex than the F350. I like the ride of the Ex over the F350 too, but I needed the adjustability of the RS9000's for the F350, because part of the year it carries a slide-in camper, and the other part of the year I carries a snow plow on the front, so adjusting for the differing equipment works well on the RS-9000's. I have been very happy with the Bilstein 5100's, in fact, I had them on my Diesel 05 Ex with the F350 springs on it, and when I replaced the 05 with my V-10 00 EX, I replaced the stock springs with F350 springs and Bilstein shocks again. Very Happy!
Garry IN AK
Steering stabilizer isn't worth going double. I crunched mine on a rock a few months ago and spent a week without one. I could hardly tell a difference with anything but steering effort.
I run bilstein shocks on mine - the yellow heavy duty ones.
On my previous EX I ran Rancho 9000 adjustable shocks and originally went with a Rancho front single stabilizer. When the Bilstein 5100 series came out I replaced the steering stabilizer, thought it was slightly smoother.
On my current Ex I run Bilstein 5100's all round plus dual front steering stabilizer.
If you like adjustability, the Rancho is a decent product but I prefer the feel of the 5100's. In my opinion the dual stabilizers make very little difference on a tire size such as yours, but they look cool
On my previous EX I ran Rancho 9000 adjustable shocks and originally went with a Rancho front single stabilizer. When the Bilstein 5100 series came out I replaced the steering stabilizer, thought it was slightly smoother.
In my opinion the dual stabilizers make very little difference on a tire size such as yours, but they look cool
I'm not concerned with overkill as I tend to over build things at times. Was curious if you had any negative issues running a dual stabilizer set up.
I actually bought the rough country dual kit from Top Gun Customs and it works well and was effective. In the feel I think it made little difference. I painted the white shocks black so that it DOESN'T show too much and kinda looks stock. I love the Bilstein 5100's I'm running all around, but I wouldn't mind black shocks as they look more factory and dont distract from the sexy "Blackness" factor. Ha!
EXv10 is gonna tell you in a coupla posts to just go get the cheapest shock you can find because they really don't need to be overbuilt for the job they do(And he's correct, I guess?)...but I like the way they work just fine!
I also go with aesthetics and what makes me happy...I've go no other bad habits so why not spend a hundred bucks more on something I WANT? Go for it!
EXv10 is gonna tell you in a coupla posts to just go get the cheapest shock you can find because they really don't need to be overbuilt for the job they do(And he's correct, I guess?)...but I like the way they work just fine!
If and when EXv10 tells me that I will have a thing or two to tell him back.
#1 shocks are not created equal and yes one could go get the cheapest shock on the market but no matter the expense its what feels good by the seat of the pants. And that is different between each and every driver out there.
For me heavier vehicles...staying with the ford theme here ...like a 79 bronco for example I preferred a heavily charged shock. Why? Because I DO NOT like the wishy washy ride some softer shocks provide. Some people like a ride like that (talking to you silverado owners ) but I do not.
On the flip side to that..in a lighter vehicle a heavily charged shock can be a little too harsh. For example turining a 1997-2006 Jeep Wrangler into a ride like a military jeep with add a leaves.
Every shock has their place and some really shine on certain platforms...or should I say mounted on certain vehicle curb weights.
If and when EXv10 tells me that I will have a thing or two to tell him back.
#1 shocks are not created equal and yes one could go get the cheapest shock on the market but no matter the expense its what feels good by the seat of the pants. And that is different between each and every driver out there.
For me heavier vehicles...staying with the ford theme here ...like a 79 bronco for example I preferred a heavily charged shock. Why? Because I DO NOT like the wishy washy ride some softer shocks provide. Some people like a ride like that (talking to you silverado owners ) but I do not.
On the flip side to that..in a lighter vehicle a heavily charged shock can be a little too harsh. For example turining a 1997-2006 Jeep Wrangler into a ride like a military jeep with add a leaves.
Every shock has their place and some really shine on certain platforms...or should I say mounted on certain vehicle curb weights.
Basically what I am saying is that I think a lot of people go overboard on shocks since all they do is keep the truck from bouncing too much and most "advanced" shocks ride stiffer giving the illusion they are better. My Monroe-matics do everything they are supposed to do, didn't break the bank, and I still retain a cushy ride.............which I like.
Basically what I am saying is that I think a lot of people go overboard on shocks since all they do is keep the truck from bouncing too much and most "advanced" shocks ride stiffer giving the illusion they are better. My Monroe-matics do everything they are supposed to do, didn't break the bank, and I still retain a cushy ride.............which I like.
please see above...as I stated it's what the driver likes and it begins and ends right there. Some shocks are stiffer and some are stofter but which is better is in the beholder of the levi's sitting in the driving seat. A stiffer shock is better to me and a softer shock is better to you. Neither is wrong and it certainly does not mean one is better than the other.
please see above...as I stated it's what the driver likes and it begins and ends right there. Some shocks are stiffer and some are stofter but which is better is in the beholder of the levi's sitting in the driving seat. A stiffer shock is better to me and a softer shock is better to you. Neither is wrong and it certainly does not mean one is better than the other.
I used to run a dual set up, but removed it. Steering pump is happier as is the turning effort. If looks are important, put an empty shock down there for the cool factor.