Jet fuel
#4
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#10
#11
#12
If I could get my hands on Jet-A or JP-8 I would gladly run it. I wouldn't go out of my way to use it, and certainly wouldn't pay more for it.
Just pointing out there are several VT365 equipped military vehicles that have to run JP-8 aka Jet-A1 fuel (Navy is JP-5).
Josh
#14
Hi guys,
I used to work in military fuels for a job, there are a few issues with running jet in a normal C/I engine. One big plus as well.
First is lubricity, in older engines it was the fuel pumps that would suffer ( US had heaps of issues with early Humvees) and in modern engines it is more the injectors that will be critical.
Second is Cetane rating, jet can be on the low side for some engines and Cetane is not a specification requirement for jet so you cant tell from checking the batch certificate of quality.
There is a "drop in" L/I C/I (lubricity improver, cetane improver) additive specifically for jet use in ground equipment, it is military approved and quality controlled, NATO code S-1750 I know Chevron and NYCO make it, NYCO have it in small packs.
Third is Sulphur content, jet is very high in Sulphur as there is no requirement for low or ultra low Sulphur levels in jet like you have in Diesel, in fact some of the Sulphur removed from the Dieso gets streamed into the jet to get rid of it. If you have a relatively modern emission control system this will cause issues, particularly with high EGR engines as you get Sulphuric acid damage in the intake, turbos and heads. The other area of accumulation of acid is the engine oil, modern oils have dropped the requirement for high alkaline reserve, or total base number (TBN) due to ultra low Sulphur Dieso, so you can deplete the oil and have acidic conditions in the crankcase. You can condition monitor the oil to find the best changeout points while running jet but a quick rule of thumb is to halve your oil change intervals to be on the safe side.
Fourth prob is the energy density, engines running on jet make less power than on diesel and require more throttle input to maintain the same tractive effort.
Fifth prob is the flash point, all of the normal jet fuels ( jet a, jet a1, f-34/jp-8, TS1, etc) have a low flash point and are classified as flammable. So exercise appropriate care whilst handling. The naval jet fuels ( avcat, f-44/jp-5) have a high flash and are combustibles the same as Dieso.
The big bonus - freeze point, jet has no wax so doesn't gel like Dieso and is good down to -47 degrees celcius. Whilst you can get arctic or winter Dieso or use some pour point depressants to use diesel just below freezing, to reliably run in very cold conditions jet is the go.
Sorry I don't know on your exact engine, but you could check if that engine is in use by the US military in a deployed state, if so it should be " single battlefield fuel" rated and good to go on jet fuel.
One that provides some help.
Cheers Brad.
I used to work in military fuels for a job, there are a few issues with running jet in a normal C/I engine. One big plus as well.
First is lubricity, in older engines it was the fuel pumps that would suffer ( US had heaps of issues with early Humvees) and in modern engines it is more the injectors that will be critical.
Second is Cetane rating, jet can be on the low side for some engines and Cetane is not a specification requirement for jet so you cant tell from checking the batch certificate of quality.
There is a "drop in" L/I C/I (lubricity improver, cetane improver) additive specifically for jet use in ground equipment, it is military approved and quality controlled, NATO code S-1750 I know Chevron and NYCO make it, NYCO have it in small packs.
Third is Sulphur content, jet is very high in Sulphur as there is no requirement for low or ultra low Sulphur levels in jet like you have in Diesel, in fact some of the Sulphur removed from the Dieso gets streamed into the jet to get rid of it. If you have a relatively modern emission control system this will cause issues, particularly with high EGR engines as you get Sulphuric acid damage in the intake, turbos and heads. The other area of accumulation of acid is the engine oil, modern oils have dropped the requirement for high alkaline reserve, or total base number (TBN) due to ultra low Sulphur Dieso, so you can deplete the oil and have acidic conditions in the crankcase. You can condition monitor the oil to find the best changeout points while running jet but a quick rule of thumb is to halve your oil change intervals to be on the safe side.
Fourth prob is the energy density, engines running on jet make less power than on diesel and require more throttle input to maintain the same tractive effort.
Fifth prob is the flash point, all of the normal jet fuels ( jet a, jet a1, f-34/jp-8, TS1, etc) have a low flash point and are classified as flammable. So exercise appropriate care whilst handling. The naval jet fuels ( avcat, f-44/jp-5) have a high flash and are combustibles the same as Dieso.
The big bonus - freeze point, jet has no wax so doesn't gel like Dieso and is good down to -47 degrees celcius. Whilst you can get arctic or winter Dieso or use some pour point depressants to use diesel just below freezing, to reliably run in very cold conditions jet is the go.
Sorry I don't know on your exact engine, but you could check if that engine is in use by the US military in a deployed state, if so it should be " single battlefield fuel" rated and good to go on jet fuel.
One that provides some help.
Cheers Brad.
#15
Hi guys,
I used to work in military fuels for a job, there are a few issues with running jet in a normal C/I engine. One big plus as well.
First is lubricity, in older engines it was the fuel pumps that would suffer ( US had heaps of issues with early Humvees) and in modern engines it is more the injectors that will be critical.
Second is Cetane rating, jet can be on the low side for some engines and Cetane is not a specification requirement for jet so you cant tell from checking the batch certificate of quality.
There is a "drop in" L/I C/I (lubricity improver, cetane improver) additive specifically for jet use in ground equipment, it is military approved and quality controlled, NATO code S-1750 I know Chevron and NYCO make it, NYCO have it in small packs.
Third is Sulphur content, jet is very high in Sulphur as there is no requirement for low or ultra low Sulphur levels in jet like you have in Diesel, in fact some of the Sulphur removed from the Dieso gets streamed into the jet to get rid of it. If you have a relatively modern emission control system this will cause issues, particularly with high EGR engines as you get Sulphuric acid damage in the intake, turbos and heads. The other area of accumulation of acid is the engine oil, modern oils have dropped the requirement for high alkaline reserve, or total base number (TBN) due to ultra low Sulphur Dieso, so you can deplete the oil and have acidic conditions in the crankcase. You can condition monitor the oil to find the best changeout points while running jet but a quick rule of thumb is to halve your oil change intervals to be on the safe side.
Fourth prob is the energy density, engines running on jet make less power than on diesel and require more throttle input to maintain the same tractive effort.
Fifth prob is the flash point, all of the normal jet fuels ( jet a, jet a1, f-34/jp-8, TS1, etc) have a low flash point and are classified as flammable. So exercise appropriate care whilst handling. The naval jet fuels ( avcat, f-44/jp-5) have a high flash and are combustibles the same as Dieso.
The big bonus - freeze point, jet has no wax so doesn't gel like Dieso and is good down to -47 degrees celcius. Whilst you can get arctic or winter Dieso or use some pour point depressants to use diesel just below freezing, to reliably run in very cold conditions jet is the go.
Sorry I don't know on your exact engine, but you could check if that engine is in use by the US military in a deployed state, if so it should be " single battlefield fuel" rated and good to go on jet fuel.
One that provides some help.
Cheers Brad.
I used to work in military fuels for a job, there are a few issues with running jet in a normal C/I engine. One big plus as well.
First is lubricity, in older engines it was the fuel pumps that would suffer ( US had heaps of issues with early Humvees) and in modern engines it is more the injectors that will be critical.
Second is Cetane rating, jet can be on the low side for some engines and Cetane is not a specification requirement for jet so you cant tell from checking the batch certificate of quality.
There is a "drop in" L/I C/I (lubricity improver, cetane improver) additive specifically for jet use in ground equipment, it is military approved and quality controlled, NATO code S-1750 I know Chevron and NYCO make it, NYCO have it in small packs.
Third is Sulphur content, jet is very high in Sulphur as there is no requirement for low or ultra low Sulphur levels in jet like you have in Diesel, in fact some of the Sulphur removed from the Dieso gets streamed into the jet to get rid of it. If you have a relatively modern emission control system this will cause issues, particularly with high EGR engines as you get Sulphuric acid damage in the intake, turbos and heads. The other area of accumulation of acid is the engine oil, modern oils have dropped the requirement for high alkaline reserve, or total base number (TBN) due to ultra low Sulphur Dieso, so you can deplete the oil and have acidic conditions in the crankcase. You can condition monitor the oil to find the best changeout points while running jet but a quick rule of thumb is to halve your oil change intervals to be on the safe side.
Fourth prob is the energy density, engines running on jet make less power than on diesel and require more throttle input to maintain the same tractive effort.
Fifth prob is the flash point, all of the normal jet fuels ( jet a, jet a1, f-34/jp-8, TS1, etc) have a low flash point and are classified as flammable. So exercise appropriate care whilst handling. The naval jet fuels ( avcat, f-44/jp-5) have a high flash and are combustibles the same as Dieso.
The big bonus - freeze point, jet has no wax so doesn't gel like Dieso and is good down to -47 degrees celcius. Whilst you can get arctic or winter Dieso or use some pour point depressants to use diesel just below freezing, to reliably run in very cold conditions jet is the go.
Sorry I don't know on your exact engine, but you could check if that engine is in use by the US military in a deployed state, if so it should be " single battlefield fuel" rated and good to go on jet fuel.
One that provides some help.
Cheers Brad.
Josh