When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I always thought that what happened is that the manufacturer (e.g. Ford) paid the dealership to do the work and either shipped the parts for free or reimbursed the dealership for the cost of the parts.
If that's the case, why does it seem like sometimes dealerships scrap and claw for any excuse they can possibly think of to avoid fixing things under warranty? Does Ford only pay them a cut rate and only reimburse them the original cost of the parts, so that the dealership feels they're not being properly compensated for their time, causing them to want to keep shop bays open for full-fare customers? Or is there something else I'm missing?
If it's under $100, the Dealership can fix it and file a claim against Ford. Simple process.
If you are over $100, the Dealership has to take photos (if applicable) and file a claim. They have to get prior approval from Corporate. The higher the $$$, the more problems they have.
Ford also uses a man/hour determination. Claims are charged according to this. Job "X" will take 10 hours of labor. Ford will pay only that rate. Reality of the situation is that Job "X" will take 15-20 hours, but the Dealership only gets $$$ for the 10 hours.
Dealerships then have to cover the difference for the extra 5-10 hours of labor their tech expends. That is also 5-10 hours of labor they aren't making money off another customer.
It's all part of the major drawback Ford started with Warranty claims about 5-6 yrs ago. It made sense from a business stand-point, but it certainly kills a lot of customer relations IMO.
If it's under $100, the Dealership can fix it and file a claim against Ford. Simple process.
If you are over $100, the Dealership has to take photos (if applicable) and file a claim. They have to get prior approval from Corporate. The higher the $$$, the more problems they have.
Ford also uses a man/hour determination. Claims are charged according to this. Job "X" will take 10 hours of labor. Ford will pay only that rate. Reality of the situation is that Job "X" will take 15-20 hours, but the Dealership only gets $$$ for the 10 hours.Only about a third right. Add in there that you return replaced parts, they inspect them, then if you're wrong, they charge all parts and labor back to the dealership.
Dealerships then have to cover the difference for the extra 5-10 hours of labor their tech expends. That is also 5-10 hours of labor they aren't making money off another customer.
It's all part of the major drawback Ford started with Warranty claims about 5-6 yrs ago. It made sense from a business stand-point, but it certainly kills a lot of customer relations IMO.
Only about a third right. Add in there that you return replaced parts, they inspect them, then if you're wrong, they charge all parts and labor back to the dealership.
I'm sure Vince will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they pay a much lower rate for warranty work than Joe Public can get if it's a customer pay. They also pay less hours; Alldata lists both mfg warranty hours and regular book hours. The warranty hours are typically 30-40% less.
Vince, do techs make less per hour on a warranty claim?
OK, so some of this is starting to make sense. Do we have people on here who actually work these cases who can testify authoritatively as to the answers, including the one like Tom's above? Actually, speaking of that I would be surprised if the individual tech's pay rate changed at all. Just what the dealer collects.
I'm sure Vince will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they pay a much lower rate for warranty work than Joe Public can get if it's a customer pay. They also pay less hours; Alldata lists both mfg warranty hours and regular book hours. The warranty hours are typically 30-40% less.
Vince, do techs make less per hour on a warranty claim?
Nope, same pay per hour. For instance, you make $20 per hour, warranty time says 1.5, you made $30. Customer pay says 2.5, you made $50. Now, if it comes back because of a mistake, you get nothing for the re-repair. Warranty calls for specific testing procedures that must be followed or the claim is denied. Connector numbers, circuit numbers tested, readings you found, pinpoint test numbers, etc. Customer comes in saying "I know what the problem is, just do this....." Nope, claim denied. Verify the symptom is the first step in any warranty diagnosis. If you just replace something on a guess (or customer suggestion) and it comes back for the same problem, you do it for free, parts and labor. Remember, (unpopular statement coming), Customer is always right. And when Ford is paying the bill, Ford is the customer' and I fix it the way they say to. If you were paying the bill, you are the customer, and I'll fix it anyway you want it.
Nope, same pay per hour. For instance, you make $20 per hour, warranty time says 1.5, you made $30. Customer pay says 2.5, you made $50. Now, if it comes back because of a mistake, you get nothing for the re-repair. Warranty calls for specific testing procedures that must be followed or the claim is denied. Connector numbers, circuit numbers tested, readings you found, pinpoint test numbers, etc. Customer comes in saying "I know what the problem is, just do this....." Nope, claim denied. Verify the symptom is the first step in any warranty diagnosis. If you just replace something on a guess (or customer suggestion) and it comes back for the same problem, you do it for free, parts and labor. Remember, (unpopular statement coming), Customer is always right. And when Ford is paying the bill, Ford is the customer' and I fix it the way they say to. If you were paying the bill, you are the customer, and I'll fix it anyway you want it.
That makes sense, but does Ford really pay the $100+ per hour labor rate that everyone else gets?