Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

64 Custom Cab Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2013 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
SRSControls's Avatar
SRSControls
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
64 Custom Cab Questions

So I'm sitting in the driver's seat of my '64 and mulling over my plans to get her going. As I looked it over, several questions came to mind.

1. The '64 column (from what I have read) is part of the steering box. and penetrates the floor very low. Since I am planning a Crown Vic swap to replace the solid front axle, can I seal up the original penetration and cut a new hole for a newer column from a later truck? and if so, would it be unwise to move the column closer to the dash more like the '65-'66 mounting?

2. I have 2 fuel tanks and a tank selector switch on the drivers side floor by the seat. The standard tank is behind the seat and one mounted at the rear of the frame behind the axle. Is it possible this is original or is this most likely an add-on?

3. I have had a hard time finding a patch panel to cover the fuel filler on the cab as I want to move the tank out of the cab. Does anyone have a source for the patch?

4. Are there any frame mounted tanks that will adapt to the frame that will allow me to use the spare tire mount under the bed (like how the 90's rangers mount I believe )?

5. Since I will be removing them from my truck and not using them, should I sell my body side moldings, windshield chrome trim, and original battery tray or trade them for a '66 grille? Or are they not worth anything but scrap aluminum and steel?

6. Are there any AC/Heat units that might fit in the truck from factory cars? For example, a small foreign car? I was planning to move my battery from under the hood so it frees up the real-estate on the firewall where such a system could mount.

I know it's a lot of questions , but after going through threads on this site for the last month on a daily basis, I haven't seen much info on these subjects. I'm just trying to determine what direction I want to go and help from the community would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks again from a new member,

Scott
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2013 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
napass2004's Avatar
napass2004
Tuned
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 351
Likes: 6
From: riverside ca
Well the column has been done a few times Garbz walked me through that you need a piece of the center of the dash for a 65-66 and weld it in and you need to modify your brake pedal bracket to attach to the column. Cut a hole in the firewall for the new exit. Not to hard the late 60s mustang tank will fit in the back of the truck in between the frame rails. The aluminum molding is worth something to some I myself still need long bed molding for a 64 but a few people don't like the molding because it traps dirt and debris others will chime in with helpful info welcome to the site
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2013 | 10:31 PM
  #3  
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 7
From: Glendale Arizona
Originally Posted by SRSControls
So I'm sitting in the driver's seat of my '64 and mulling over my plans to get her going. As I looked it over, several questions came to mind.

1. The '64 column (from what I have read) is part of the steering box. and penetrates the floor very low. Since I am planning a Crown Vic swap to replace the solid front axle, can I seal up the original penetration and cut a new hole for a newer column from a later truck? and if so, would it be unwise to move the column closer to the dash more like the '65-'66 mounting?

You need to decide as a whole just what engine and trans combo along with the column and seats you want to run. This will dictate just where the steering column will need to exit the firewall or floor board to allow the correct angles on the u joints from the rack to the column.

The steering column on your truck is not integral to the box. The steering shaft is integral. it slips up and off the shaft. So unless you modify the column with a lower bearing and retianer and cut off and reuse your shaft you need a new column.



2. I have 2 fuel tanks and a tank selector switch on the drivers side floor by the seat. The standard tank is behind the seat and one mounted at the rear of the frame behind the axle. Is it possible this is original or is this most likely an add-on?

The frame rail tank and selector valve is an add on. Dealer or aftermarket.

3. I have had a hard time finding a patch panel to cover the fuel filler on the cab as I want to move the tank out of the cab. Does anyone have a source for the patch?

18 Ga Cold rolled and a hammer and dolly. Ford used to have a fuel tank delete plug but those have been gone for years and no one has a reproduction.

4. Are there any frame mounted tanks that will adapt to the frame that will allow me to use the spare tire mount under the bed (like how the 90's rangers mount I believe )?

Research a later 60s Mustang tank as Napass Suggests. Done lots of times to slicks and learner trucks. However with lowering the truck using a cast aluminum front suspension you would possibly find a tire under a fuel tank to be dragging on the ground. [/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

5. Since I will be removing them from my truck and not using them, should I sell my body side moldings, windshield chrome trim, and original battery tray or trade them for a '66 grille? Or are they not worth anything but scrap aluminum and steel?

The 64 trim is one year only. If it is a short bed do not sell it for less than $250. A long bed set will bring $200. Windshield Stainless should bring about 50.00 to 100.00 to the right buyer. The original battery tray is worth $20 bucks as these are reproduced.

6. Are there any AC/Heat units that might fit in the truck from factory cars? For example, a small foreign car? I was planning to move my battery from under the hood so it frees up the real-estate on the firewall where such a system could mount.

I was once told yugo unit work quite spiffy. Or purchase a real aftermarket unit and that way it will not hokey up you build.

I know it's a lot of questions , but after going through threads on this site for the last month on a daily basis, I haven't seen much info on these subjects. I'm just trying to determine what direction I want to go and help from the community would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks again from a new member,

Scott
Answers Above Welcome to FTE

Garbz
 
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2013 | 02:23 AM
  #4  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by garbz2
The 64 trim (body side mouldings) is one year only.
1963 and 1964 F100/250: The following are the same anodized aluminum side mouldings:

Hood side mouldings: In front of side emblem (right/left specific) and rear of side emblem (right/left specific).

Cowl mouldings (right/left same).

Door mouldings (right/left specific).

Cab corner mouldings: 1963's with 'wrong' bed same as 1964's with 'wrong' bed, right/left specific.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Custom Cab (& 1965/66 F100/250 Ranger) stainless steel windshield reveal mouldings same: 1961/66 F100/1100 - 1963/69 N/NT/T500/1100 - 1967/69 F800/1000.

The only fuel tank that came in these trucks was the in-cab tank. 1967 was the first year for optional left (drivers) side 25 gallon auxillary tank. Was used in conjunction with in-cab tank.

Ford never offered saddle tanks factory installed or as a dealer installed accessory.

Late 1960's Mustang tank? 1965/68: 16 gallon tank, same as 1967/68 Cougar. 1969 Mustang/Cougar: 20 gallon tank. 1970 Mustang/Cougar: 22 gallon tank. 1971/73 Mustang/Cougar: 20 gallon tank.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 12:09 AM
  #5  
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 7
From: Glendale Arizona
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
1963 and 1964 F100/250: The following are the same anodized aluminum side mouldings:

Hood side mouldings: In front of side emblem (right/left specific) and rear of side emblem (right/left specific).

Cowl mouldings (right/left same).

Door mouldings (right/left specific).

Cab corner mouldings: 1963's with 'wrong' bed same as 1964's with 'wrong' bed, right/left specific.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Custom Cab (& 1965/66 F100/250 Ranger) stainless steel windshield reveal mouldings same: 1961/66 F100/1100 - 1963/69 N/NT/T500/1100 - 1967/69 F800/1000.

The only fuel tank that came in these trucks was the in-cab tank. 1967 was the first year for optional left (drivers) side 25 gallon auxillary tank. Was used in conjunction with in-cab tank.

Ford never offered saddle tanks factory installed or as a dealer installed accessory.

Late 1960's Mustang tank? 1965/68: 16 gallon tank, same as 1967/68 Cougar. 1969 Mustang/Cougar: 20 gallon tank. 1970 Mustang/Cougar: 22 gallon tank. 1971/73 Mustang/Cougar: 20 gallon tank.
Yea, Late 60s' like you posted....

Garbz
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 12:30 AM
  #6  
Bill W's Avatar
Bill W
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,564
Likes: 4
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by garbz2
Yea, Late 60s' like you posted....

Garbz

fits nicely where the spare tire is located... some modifications are needed.
and find another place to keep the spare.

Welcome to FTE.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 08:26 AM
  #7  
camperspecial65's Avatar
camperspecial65
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 5
From: seattle
The moldings are only worth what one will pay for them...plus if they are beat to heck like most they arent worth much if anything...PM or email me with what you have...I may be interested in the good ones you have...


- cs65
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 08:52 AM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by garbz2
Yea, Late 60s' like you posted....
1965/66 isn't considered late 60's, it's mid-60's. And since 1965/68 is the same....
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 11:45 AM
  #9  
Bill W's Avatar
Bill W
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,564
Likes: 4
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
1965/66 isn't considered late 60's, it's mid-60's. And since 1965/68 is the same....
most people doing this swap go for the "late 60's 69-70 tank because they hold a few more gallons of fuel....
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 11:49 AM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Bill W
most people doing this swap go for the "late 60's 69-70 tank because they hold a few more gallons of fuel....
That's why I listed all the 1965/73 tanks, so people could see what was available.
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #11  
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 7
From: Glendale Arizona
Yea like Bill Wilson said.............Sheeez....LOL

Garbz
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 10:56 AM
  #12  
SRSControls's Avatar
SRSControls
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the replies and info, this is precisely why I joined this site!

Number, Thanks for all the research and hard work you put into giving everyone the accurate factory info! you are appreciated!

Garbz, I was toying with the idea of doing the Crown Vic front swap. After reading what you & others have had to say on the subject, I have changed my mind and will be doing the Dak swap from IC. Even though it's more expensive, I feel more comfortable with a suspension that has been designed to work on our vehicles and not risk the safety of my family.

As far as my truck, it is a '64 long bed Custom Cab. I do not like the body side moulding or the grille and will be posting it up for sale in the appropriate section when I have access. I might be open to a trade for a passenger side door panel corner piece? maybe a barter for a '66 grille? lol

I have decided to go with the 5.3 Chevy LS motor and the 4L60/4L80 in my '64 for now until I get a title for my '66 short bed. Once I get that, I will be swapping the 5.3 to the '66 and getting serious on the '64 build. Future plans are for a 6.0 LS and a NV4500 with a heavy duty 9" axle.

I have already started de-construction on the '64 and aside from Rusty U-nuts the truck is amazingly rust free. I will start a build thread when I am further along so I don't bore you with the snails pace I am able to afford working on her.

Once again, thanks to all of you for your help and input. I look forward to a long and happy tenure here on the site.

Scott.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2013 | 11:13 AM
  #13  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by garbz2
Yea like Bill Wilson said.............Sheeez....LOL

Garbz
Which Bill Wilson, this one or that one, or both?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnmel59
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Sep 30, 2014 04:23 PM
amsnss
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
Mar 18, 2014 09:13 AM
66F250CS
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
22
Mar 25, 2013 03:43 AM
F250GH
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Oct 27, 2011 11:27 AM
Pickupmanx2
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Dec 14, 2006 02:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE