Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Front axle location

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 07:39 AM
  #1  
Dale Fairfax's Avatar
Dale Fairfax
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Front axle location

'Went to a local show this weekend and drove my '53 F-100. It's kinda like a "resto rod": Essentially a restoration but some custom things-still Flathead powered. The truck is nice but as I looked around the show, I realized I wasn't going to take home a trophy. There were 3 other '55-'56 F-100s there that had been given the full "dark side" treatment: late model drive trains, A/C, custom interiors with power buckets, I.F.S., $$$ paint & chrome-absolutely beautiful trucks.

However,I couln't help but notice one thing about all of them. I guess I thought that EVERYBODY in the F-100 world was aware of the one most significant visual defect in the '53-'56 models: the front axle is about 1 1/4"-1 1/2" too far to the rear relative to the arch in the front fender. All 3 of these high dollar trucks had Mustang II or Jag front ends in them yet the builders had located them in the original position: too far back. I would have thought that that was the perfect opportunity to fix the obvious.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 07:57 AM
  #2  
Olweldinrig's Avatar
Olweldinrig
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
From: Edenwold Saskatchewan
I am sure all the mono leaf sets and such correct that.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 08:27 AM
  #3  
Schuyles's Avatar
Schuyles
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, TN
Originally Posted by Dale Fairfax
I would have thought that that was the perfect opportunity to fix the obvious.
I have had this same thought a million times...

When I was looking for a '56, I ran into a few trucks that were almost "perfect" for me...except that the aftermarket front ends placed the front wheel in the stock "wrong" location.

Maybe they like keeping it original? Maybe they like that tight turning radius! ha
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 09:50 AM
  #4  
Kurt G.'s Avatar
Kurt G.
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 815
Likes: 29
From: Richland, WA.
Does the wheel setback give it the tight turn??? I though it had something to do with the steering box?? Will I loose that going to the Toyota box?
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 10:00 AM
  #5  
4tl8ford's Avatar
4tl8ford
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,493
Likes: 7
From: Erie, pa
It's not wrong - It's the way it is designed
The engineers had to have a reason
The position of the steering box doesnt have anything to do with the wheel/axle position - The Toyo box won't change it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 10:04 AM
  #6  
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
Believe Nothing
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,519
Likes: 403
From: W. Central FL.
Club FTE Silver Member

So where does it end? What are the obvious that need "fixing?" These truck sit too high, they're underpowered, they only have six volts, they have uncomfortable bench seats, they steer hard, they don't have AC, they don't have power brakes, and the list goes on and on. Can we say "darkside" or shades of grey?
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #7  
Kurt G.'s Avatar
Kurt G.
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 815
Likes: 29
From: Richland, WA.
Originally Posted by raytasch
So where does it end? What are the obvious that need "fixing?" These truck sit too high, they're underpowered, they only have six volts, they have uncomfortable bench seats, they steer hard, they don't have AC, they don't have power brakes, and the list goes on and on. Can we say "darkside" or shades of grey?
And for all those reasons we are first attracted to the trucks, if were fixing problems I want mine to fly like in back to the future with a way to use garbage as fuel. I can afford the gas then, Hahaha.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 10:44 AM
  #8  
wallster's Avatar
wallster
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 564
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo
We installed a heidt's mustang II kit on my last '51 and the instructions gave specific measurements (on the frame) where to weld the crossmember and upper shock mounts (they use the front spring mount holes as a reference point, see pic below, to measure from). We didn't deviate from the directions since we felt that the engineering/design people placed it in this position to avoid "surprises". It may be a different story for the '53-'56's.
My current '51 still has the manual steering box from the factory and since the front steering components appear to be in great condition I don't see the need in removing all the components, then lifting the engine (to replace the front sump oil pan that will hit the new welded crossmember) so I'm going to install the toyota steering box. The last truck was lowered 3" which looked nice but getting under her to do anything became a chore. As far as winning anything at a car show I've never felt like it was possible unless I spend $40K to go all out and build a truck I'm afraid to park at the corner store. Plus my wife would "Lorraina Bobbit" me in my sleep if I spent that much on it.

Wally

'51 - 'ol red

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 11:08 AM
  #9  
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,882
Likes: 88
From: Durham NC
If you want to"correct" the front axle location with the stock beam axle, you can easily and inexpensively (especially if you are replacing the springs or eye bushings anyways) do it by replacing the OEM springs with Mid Fifty's "down and forward" leaf springs plus extended draglink. The main leaf has the centerbolt moved forward to move the axle. If you don't want to lower it, just add a couple original leafs back into the new stack. This will work with the OEM or the Toyota box. I like what they did with Foose's 56. When they put in the IFS they moved it 5 forwards of the stock location to give the truck a 115" WB then moved the wheel arches 4" forwards in the fenders to visually lighten the front fender overhang. This also had the secondary advantage making any oil pan sump/crossmember interference problems installing the Roush crate engine disappear.

Oh yah, the "misplaced" axle location is only on the 53-56 F100.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
Dale Fairfax's Avatar
Dale Fairfax
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
I didn't say it was wrong-and I'm sure the engineers had the wheelbase established before the stylists got into the act. I merely said it was a "visual defect" which I believe has become a consensus over the years among fans of these trucks.



Originally Posted by 4tl8ford
It's not wrong - It's the way it is designed
The engineers had to have a reason
The position of the steering box doesnt have anything to do with the wheel/axle position - The Toyo box won't change it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 11:46 AM
  #11  
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,882
Likes: 88
From: Durham NC
I suspect it was done for OEM size tire clearance when wheels are turned and suspension is fully loaded/cycled.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #12  
38Chevy454's Avatar
38Chevy454
More Turbo
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 521
Likes: 6
From: Cincinnati, OH
Wallster, the 48-52 don't have the same visual problem, it is the 53-56 that have the issue. As AXRacer stated.

Agree with the orig post that if installing an IFS or similar mods, fix the problem when you are doing it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 01:27 PM
  #13  
Schuyles's Avatar
Schuyles
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, TN
Originally Posted by Kurt G.
Does the wheel setback give it the tight turn??? I though it had something to do with the steering box?? Will I loose that going to the Toyota box?
I don't know for sure, I can't site any authority on it...but I've heard that quite a bit. Kind of makes sense to me, but I'm no expert..
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 01:28 PM
  #14  
Schuyles's Avatar
Schuyles
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, TN
Originally Posted by Dale Fairfax
I didn't say it was wrong-and I'm sure the engineers had the wheelbase established before the stylists got into the act. I merely said it was a "visual defect" which I believe has become a consensus over the years among fans of these trucks.
I agree, and I think most everyone except 4tl8ford understands your point and what quotations mean when used online.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2013 | 03:51 PM
  #15  
Okiedokie's Avatar
Okiedokie
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 3
From: okla
Club FTE Silver Member

I agree with "visual defect" in the 53. That is why I corrected it when I installed the Volare suspension. If I were to do another [not likely] I would install an IFS moved farther forward and move the wheel opening in the fender to match. Much more visually pleasing to me and allow a low truck with better front bumper clearance.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE