300 I6 -vs- 4.2 L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-17-2013, 09:23 AM
Tote-M-Pole's Avatar
Tote-M-Pole
Tote-M-Pole is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rust/Salt Belt in SW Mich
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300 I6 -vs- 4.2 L

I have a two wheel drive 96 F150 with the 300 I 6/auto trans. The truck has 130K miles on it without any trouble ever with the engine and trans. I wish I could say the same for the truck. The truck has the snow belt blues rather extensively. So I am looking to get something newer and similar.
My budget puts me in the 07/08 year range. I know nothing about 4.2. Can any one give me a knowledgeable comparison between these engines and trannys? I know it is I6 -vs- V6 pushrod engines and I believe the 4.2 is a roller engine. Any info is appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 03-17-2013, 02:29 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,876
Received 1,595 Likes on 1,300 Posts
4.2s seem to be pretty good:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...-on-4-2-a.html

We have (had? --I no longer work at the airport) tugs with both the 300 and the 4.2. Pulling maybe 5000 lbs, either would do the job just fine. The 300 usually pulled in one gear, where the 4.2 would shift. They were just set up that way. Not sure what trans--I think I saw "Morse" on one. Note these are 15-20 mph governed vehicles.

So the 4.2 is a smaller motor, and has less low end torque. Gearing takes care of that.

Specs here:

Ford F150 Engine Specifications 4.6L 5.4L 4.2L

Later model 300 info here:

http://jastrauss.fastmail.fm/1990_p16.jpg
 
  #3  
Old 03-27-2013, 11:15 AM
1979 Ford's Avatar
1979 Ford
1979 Ford is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Not as far west as I want
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
The 300 has more low end. The 4.2 doesn't have the low end, however it isn't a complete dog either. I have an 05 with the 4.2 it is a good engine. I like the 4.2, however I like the 4.6 better. The mileage difference isn't that great and more pony power out of the 4.6.

The 300s I've had seemed to have better mileage then the 4.2 I have. I had a 98 with 4.6 would get 17 to 19 MPG, my 05 4.2 gets 16 to 17 MPG.
 
  #4  
Old 04-02-2013, 09:45 AM
BlueOvalFitter's Avatar
BlueOvalFitter
BlueOvalFitter is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cajun Country
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Thumbs up

IMO, the 300-6 was one of the best engines Ford has ever built.
I have owned 2 versions of the 4.2; the 97 with all the gasket problems and my current 07. As you know, Ford made the 4.2 up to 08. I wouldn't call it a bad engine but I will not say it was the best; it did serve it's purpose though.
The best advice I can give is to use Motorcraft parts! Being it filters, plugs, wires, sensors, etc. Trust me on this!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1BadTruck-JK
3.8 & 4.2L V6
6
05-21-2023 12:13 PM
jimbo beam
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
24
10-03-2013 11:56 PM
less
3.8 & 4.2L V6
12
06-23-2008 06:16 PM
aguyfrmtx
3.8 & 4.2L V6
45
05-19-2006 12:47 AM
javi2001
3.8 & 4.2L V6
22
02-25-2006 08:03 AM



Quick Reply: 300 I6 -vs- 4.2 L



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.