F600 needs Headers
#1
#3
#4
Headers for F600 391 - Resolution
Well, after much thought and dinkling around, I removed the one I had installed and sent the headers back. I am installing dual exhaust instead, since I want more flow/less restriction. This seems to be a more the viable option. Thanks for your help everyone!
#6
The crossover is simply a mechanism to warm up the intake manifold to allow fuel to vaporize when it is cold. The down side is it is a power robber when it is warm. It warms up the entire intake charge of air and fuel making it less dense which translates to less power. Many engines have this and many aftermarket intakes and heads eliminate the crossover because it is a power robber.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
The massive cast intake is different than aftermarket alum which is probably not available for the 391 unless you do a full swap to 390 heads and intake. If you want a big increase in power the 390 heads and intake will breath way better and give you sizable increase in power.
Not sure on your 391, but the one I have on my engine stand has massive dished pistons with super low compression. I am in process of building with 360 pistons and 390 heads/intake/cam. It is for a 40" bluebird bus.
Not sure on your 391, but the one I have on my engine stand has massive dished pistons with super low compression. I am in process of building with 360 pistons and 390 heads/intake/cam. It is for a 40" bluebird bus.
#9
The massive cast intake is different than aftermarket alum which is probably not available for the 391 unless you do a full swap to 390 heads and intake. If you want a big increase in power the 390 heads and intake will breath way better and give you sizable increase in power.
Not sure on your 391, but the one I have on my engine stand has massive dished pistons with super low compression. I am in process of building with 360 pistons and 390 heads/intake/cam. It is for a 40" bluebird bus.
Not sure on your 391, but the one I have on my engine stand has massive dished pistons with super low compression. I am in process of building with 360 pistons and 390 heads/intake/cam. It is for a 40" bluebird bus.
Ford (and GM, and Chrysler, International, Reo, and all of the others) made all of there medium and heavy truck GAS engines with lower compression ratios for a reason.
Slogging uphill, throttle down is where it is at with a relatively small displacement for the weight moved engine and that lower compression engine DESIGNED for this type of service is what will hold up, and there is no way that any of us at FTE can spend the amount of engineering $$$ getting to where EVERY medium and heavy duty gas engine maker got to with there engineering $$$.
David
#10
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigtymer77
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
2
08-10-2004 12:35 AM