Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

cam help please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 02:27 PM
  #1  
jaye's Avatar
jaye
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 0
From: S.C.
cam help please

I don't know anything about #s when it comes to cams; so I have a question for all of you engine Gurus. I have a Engine Works hyd came 280/.460 lift I've been told conflicting information on the numbers what do they mean. Will it work well for a stock 289? Any other information would be be appreciated also.
Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 03:10 PM
  #2  
fatfenders's Avatar
fatfenders
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 124
From: Iowa
That's quite a bit of duration in a 289 for a truck, auto trans combo unless maybe you got some gear to go with it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
eman92082's Avatar
eman92082
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 38
From: Valley Center, California
Club FTE Gold Member
There are many good on-line articles that explain cam specs. There are a variety of geometrical attributes to consider if you want to really understand camshafts and how they affect the engine. The cam manufacturers all give descriptions about what type applications the cams are ground for i.e. Compression, RPM Range, Vehicle weight, Headers needed, Rear-End gears, Torque Converter stall etc.

In general, the 280 number refers to the "advertised duration". In recent years, they spec that figure out at ".050 lift" which for a 280 cam is about 230. Like I said, it easier to read up on it.

280 degrees of duration with stock 289 heads is at the limit. With a set of headers it should be OK but it may have a lopey idle. If you need low RPM torque, you'd be better off at 260-272. Another factor is a spec referred to as "lobe separation angle". If this is running say 112-114 degrees you're probably OK. If it's down around 108, you're going to have issues.

The lift of .460 is just fine.



Dawg-a-Roo
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 08:05 PM
  #4  
fatfenders's Avatar
fatfenders
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 124
From: Iowa
The cam in question has long ramps. Its .050 duration is actually 218. The LSA is not listed. As eman states, that is an important detail. They list the powerband starting at 2000 so I suspect the lobe center angle is not wide like you need.

If you want a cam I know will work that is not expensive, Summit sells a Edelbrock Performer "knock off" that is cheap. Exact same lift ad duration as a Performer. I have ran them and they work real good in a heavier street vehicle with auto trans. Put some decent mufflers on it and it will still sound good if that is a factor.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
rhopper's Avatar
rhopper
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 1
From: peyton, colorado
Club FTE Silver Member

Fenders, I'm also running the ebrock performer knock off. I've seen some refer to it as an RV cam. Good power at lower rpm, which is really where we spend most of our time. Starts to flatten out at 4500-5000 rpm. It would be a good combo with stock heads on a small motor. Better combo for a cruiser than lumpy cam with big numbers.

Cams are like women. The wild ones are pretty exciting to be around at a party but living with them day to day can get frustrating. They need to go high rpm all the time and sometimes you just want to cruise. The mild ones don't attract as much attention but they're much easier to live with long term. Still alot of fun, though.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 02:32 PM
  #6  
eman92082's Avatar
eman92082
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 38
From: Valley Center, California
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by rhopper
Cams are like women. The wild ones are pretty exciting to be around at a party but living with them day to day can get frustrating. They need to go high rpm all the itime and sometimes you just want to cruise.
Interesting analogy though ladies do read this forum.

I confess in my old age that too much cam is just right since my projects are not daily drivers. I run a 2800 stall comverter with a 3:25 gear. I love the big lump going through a set of quiet mufflers. I can tune around the issues but it takes some work. For those who like the lump the "thumper" cams are designed to lope while maintaining good manners.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2013 | 03:58 PM
  #7  
jaye's Avatar
jaye
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 0
From: S.C.
What do you think of this cam from summit

Manufacturer's Part Number: SUM-3600
Cam Style: Hydraulic flat tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 1,200-4,800
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 204
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 214
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 204 int./214 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 280
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 289
Advertised Duration: 280 int./289 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.449 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.473 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.449 int./0.473 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112
Computer-Controlled Compatible: No
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2013 | 04:12 PM
  #8  
eman92082's Avatar
eman92082
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 38
From: Valley Center, California
Club FTE Gold Member
I'd say that's a good selection.

I recommend headers (shorty or otherwise). Cast iron Small Block Ford exhaust manifolds are awful though the later 302 tube manifolds are pretty good for the street. I'd think it would be pretty good to about 5500 RPM also. Good lift for bottom end power. LSA of 112 degrees should be fine. You may even have a bit of lopey idle.

Dawg-A-Roo
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:19 PM
  #9  
rhopper's Avatar
rhopper
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 1
From: peyton, colorado
Club FTE Silver Member

That 204/214 cam is the same grind as the edelbrock performer. I'm running the same cam. Ebrock makes it and so does every other cam manufacturer. Mine is a no name with that grind. Works ok for a cruiser, but flattens out pretty quickly, less than 5000 rpm. 16" of vacuum.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 08:41 PM
  #10  
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,882
Likes: 88
From: Durham NC
IMHO if I was swapping out a cam today I wouldn't even consider a flat tappet. With the EPA mandated oils a flat tappet isn't going to last long especially if you use heavy springs. It would be cheaper in the long run to put it a roller cam. In my experience, I have always called the cam manufacturer(s) directly, told them what mods the engine has: heads, pistons, intake, carb, what tranny and rear axle ratio, tire size, and how it will be driven and ask for their advice on the right cam to use rather than guessing, asking around, or buying out of a distributor's catalog just by the specs. i have always been much happier.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #11  
mytbtruck's Avatar
mytbtruck
Laughing Gas
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Likes: 3
From: Sandy Run SC
Originally Posted by AXracer
IMHO if I was swapping out a cam today I wouldn't even consider a flat tappet. With the EPA mandated oils a flat tappet isn't going to last long especially if you use heavy springs. It would be cheaper in the long run to put it a roller cam. In my experience, I have always called the cam manufacturer(s) directly, told them what mods the engine has: heads, pistons, intake, carb, what tranny and rear axle ratio, tire size, and how it will be driven and ask for their advice on the right cam to use rather than guessing, asking around, or buying out of a distributor's catalog just by the specs. i have always been much happier.
Best advice , I agree. Just putting a cam in usually does not work without some good research.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 10:02 PM
  #12  
fatfenders's Avatar
fatfenders
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 124
From: Iowa
As a general rule that's great advice. I run custom roller cams in most of my performance rides. The cam Jaye is considering is mellow though. It's a knockoff of the Edelbrock Performer flat tappet cam that has been around for perhaps 20 years. I've been running it for 10 years without issue. It is very mild, cheap and works with pretty soft springs. A roller conversion in SB Ford is pretty expensive and probably not necessary for the mild ramp rate of the listed cam.

Don't let me speak for you though Jaye as I don't know your budget. Last time I looked the retro roller lifters were about $350, reduced base circle roller cam must be used as a standard SBF roller cam will not clear in a non roller block 289. Probably a at least $250 for the special cam. Choices are limited in small base circle unless you go custom cam.

Here is a fairly mild retro roller kit from COMP Cams. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-k31-422-8
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 11:16 PM
  #13  
underthebridgejim's Avatar
underthebridgejim
FTE fan
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,674
Likes: 11
From: paradise, northern calif.
Club FTE Gold Member
Just another happy performer plus user. My 68 302 is basicly the same motor as your 289, I also used the performer intake, 600 carb, some stiffer springs, pushrods , tight tuck headers, and 2 1/2" pipes. My power is as stated B4 by others in the low rpm band, falling off around 4 to 45 hundred RPM wich is just what I like when driving.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 07:47 AM
  #14  
oldmerc's Avatar
oldmerc
oldmerc
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 5
From: Edmonton,Alberta
Club FTE Gold Member
AX is right it's best to contact the companies tech dept. I have always had good results with that approach .
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 10:36 AM
  #15  
fatfenders's Avatar
fatfenders
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 124
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by underthebridgejim
Just another happy performer plus user. My 68 302 is basicly the same motor as your 289, I also used the performer intake, 600 carb, some stiffer springs, pushrods , tight tuck headers, and 2 1/2" pipes. My power is as stated B4 by others in the low rpm band, falling off around 4 to 45 hundred RPM wich is just what I like when driving.
It definitely runs in the rpm range Edelbrock intended. They are great for heavy street vehicles. I even took my Effie to the track once. Pulls nicely until about 70 mph and the acceleration slows way down after that. I like the fuel economy though so I'll likely never pull it. It's a nice cruiser cam for a very low price.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE