Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Considering an upgrade, Advice needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 09:38 PM
  #1  
scott2683's Avatar
scott2683
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Considering an upgrade, Advice needed

I have a 2006 4x4 super cab XLT. It has 3:73 gears and is a gas hog. I do 80% highway driving and I average 12-13 MPG's.

I happened to be driving through the ford dealership today and found a 2013 F150 4x4 SXT 5.0 . After talking with the salesman I found out they have $5000 rebates right now, making the truck around $28000 brand new. One of my questions was, what kind of mileage are you guys getting out of your 5.0's? There is definitely more power there. It felt solid and was a lot more comfortable than my 06. I don't do much towing but I use if for hauling sometimes, so I need the utility of a truck. I just can't decide if its worth my time to trade it in. Mine only has 70k miles with no issues.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 10:34 PM
  #2  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 380
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
IMHO, both the 5.0 & ecoboost are still having minor issues to be worked out in these applications.......although it is costing you a little in gas, you are way ahead $ wise with the low mileage of running that truck for a few more years! IMHO, I would not consider a 5.0 or Ecoboost until they are at the end of year 3 production...by then anything that will happen will be resolved with the drivtrains....including tranny, driveshaft issues, etc.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 10:37 PM
  #3  
scott2683's Avatar
scott2683
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Thanks man I appreciate your reply. I get what you're saying. With it being my only vehicle I need something that is going to be dependable and get me back and forth to work. I heard they were having some issues with the EB but I haven't heard much on the 5.0. I'll have to do some research and educate myself a little more.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:09 PM
  #4  
TheStuffz's Avatar
TheStuffz
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 611
Likes: 3
From: Estevan, Saskatchewan
got a scab 4x4 eco with 3.73's and getting 18-19 sometimes 22
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #5  
swann79's Avatar
swann79
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 46
From: Kemmerer, Wyoming
I would say something is wrong. 12-13 highway sucks on an '06 F-150.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:33 PM
  #6  
scott2683's Avatar
scott2683
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Yeah, you'd think something was wrong. I do have taller tires on it, but not enough to make much of a difference. Its well maintained. There's nothing wrong with it. But I've owned it for 2 years and the most I have ever got from it was 15 on a trip.

Its probably time for new plugs, which is going to be a pain...but other than that I don't know why. I don't drive it hard either. Its not like I mash the pedal when I take off.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:41 PM
  #7  
swann79's Avatar
swann79
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 46
From: Kemmerer, Wyoming
I had an '04 with 3.55s and averaged 17 highway. My brother (a ford dealer tech) has an '04 FX4 with 3.73s and averages about the same. He also likes the 5.4 better than the 5.0, but I have no experience with the 5.0. How much taller are your tires from stock? It only takes two inches to screw up your gearing, and sometimes an inch will do it. There are many other variables to consider. It's not uncommon to need new plugs at your mileage... and I highly recommend them anyways. At 75,000 miles, mine were shot and the engine started missing. The earlier you get them factory plugs out, the better chance you have at getting them out without breaking them.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:48 PM
  #8  
scott2683's Avatar
scott2683
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
The tires that are on it are a little over 34" so I would say thats at least 2 inches, but the mileage was bad beforehand. Why did your brother say he liked the 5.4 better? I don't have any issues with the engine. Its plenty enough power for what I need.

I intend to change the plugs early spring. I'm not looking forward to it though. I do have the plug removal tool though in case I need it. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 12:01 AM
  #9  
swann79's Avatar
swann79
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Army
20 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 46
From: Kemmerer, Wyoming
I would say that your gearing is definitely off running 34" tires. Making the engine work harder will suck more fuel. As for the mileage before the tire swap, that's a head scratcher.

Good thing you have the removal tool, it will most likely be needed. The plugs really aren't as bad as most people make it out to be, it can just be time consuming removing the broken plugs. Once you figure out the removal tool, you'll agree.

I still believe re-gearing will help your fuel mileage... but in your situation I think I would upgrade to the newer truck if the money isn't a problem. My brother thinks that the 5.4 puts out more power than than the 5.0. I personally think he is a little biased simply because that is what he owns.

My '12 is a wonderful truck and much nicer in every way than my '04 was. More room, power, fuel mileage, and features.

I can understand the concern about the early production of the EB/5.0 and supposedly the 2014s will have the next generation EcoBoost motors... not sure but I imagine the 5.0 will be updated as well. Something to think about.

It all boils down to what feels better to you. If it were me and I could afford it... I would upgrade ASAP.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 01:04 AM
  #10  
mpally's Avatar
mpally
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
I wouldn't be worried about by a 2013 with a 5.0. I have a 2013 XLT 4x4 Screw with 3.55 and I'm averaging 15.9 mpg for the first 4,200 miles. I drive about 50/50 city highway. So far I have been happy with the 5.0. You need to run the numbers to see what your breakeven point is as far as the mpg improvement vs. additional cost of the new truck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 12:15 PM
  #11  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 380
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by scott2683
Thanks man I appreciate your reply. I get what you're saying. With it being my only vehicle I need something that is going to be dependable and get me back and forth to work. I heard they were having some issues with the EB but I haven't heard much on the 5.0. I'll have to do some research and educate myself a little more.
with the 5.0- drivshaft & oil burning issues
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 12:19 PM
  #12  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,100
Likes: 380
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
Spark Plug Change - FYI

Originally Posted by scott2683
Yeah, you'd think something was wrong. I do have taller tires on it, but not enough to make much of a difference. Its well maintained. There's nothing wrong with it. But I've owned it for 2 years and the most I have ever got from it was 15 on a trip.

Its probably time for new plugs, which is going to be a pain...but other than that I don't know why. I don't drive it hard either. Its not like I mash the pedal when I take off.
When I decided it was time to change the plugs (2006 Mark LT 4x2, 5.4, 35,000 miles) with the Motorcraft SP 515’s. Although I knew about the carbon build-up/plug removal issue, I decided not to change the plugs until there was a replacement plug that I was comfortable with…meaning I knew it was a good quality plug in terms of component design and construction. Although I did follow the most recent TSB, I also relied on my experience back in the 1970’s when aluminum heads & intake manifolds were just entering the street scene and never-seize did not exist. Here are the exceptions to the TSB that I did…
1.I ran Lucas fuel injection cleaner, mixed at 3 times their recommendation in 1 full tank of gasoline. Purpose…if I was lucky, it would dissolve or loosen any carbon buildup (although many do a real fuel injection cleaning also- and it is probably a best practice to do if you have more than 45-50,000 miles on the plugs)
2. Although I am a fan of PB Blaster, I used a product called ChemSearch “Yield”. The issue I have with using carb cleaner is the lack of lubrication…..in the old days of removing steel plugs from aluminum heads, we use to mix up acetone & ATF…or of we needed more lubrication, kerosene & ATF, “Yield” provides this lubrication- much better IMHO than even PB Blaster.
3. Yes, I put anti-seize on the plug threads (I know the TSB says not to)
4. Of course…a lot of patience, I really doubt if I ever put more than 20-25 lbs of force during removal (purposefully)
The end result, only one plug even “squeaked” coming out (but it basically unscrewed like a regular plug- literally). Plug #4 was initially a little stubborn, but after the second try, then waiting about 30 minutes, it came out with very little effort…just kept wiggling the plugs (tightening/loosening) by 1/8th or even less of a turn- and they all came out without a single one breaking or any issue really. Another technique that can definitely be used is to loosen the plugs about 1/8 of a turn, start the engine for about 30 seconds to 1 minute- this allows the flame to travel up around the plug to burn off the carbon, let cool, then remove with the process I previously described.
As far as using an air ratchet, I can understand the theory of “shocking” the carbon loose, but I have also seen and experienced in my younger days some real disasters.
Actual working time: 2 hours…..including washing my hands, total time was 5 hours.
FYI- Why I choose Motorcraft.
In the 1970’s I ran (like many) Champion’s in just about everything (even had the gold palladiums), but stopped in the early 1980’s when they changed their copper-core design and the resulting quality problems that IMHO still exist today. Since then I have run Splitfire (non-platinum) in my old world (1960’s) cars, Bosch in my late 1990’s vehicles (both because the cylinder head design really prefers these types of plugs), but I really had hesitation because of the construction/component quality of the non-Motorcraft plugs and really questioned the durability in this application about the Motorcraft SP508 or SP 509’s which are single platinum. Given the types of loads and burn/flame promulgation rates in the chambers, I really had doubts about the style of the plug with single platinum having the ability to “survive” as long as they engineers said. What do ya know…the SP 515’s are double platinum.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 01:29 PM
  #13  
bigdaddyII's Avatar
bigdaddyII
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,155
Likes: 0
From: Southern Louisiana
Mixed


Mostly Highway


Thats my 2012 Super Crew with stock everything, 5.0 and 3.31 gears
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 12:12 PM
  #14  
dave91gt's Avatar
dave91gt
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 12
From: Kenna,wv
The 5.0 is a monster compared to ANY 5.4 I have ever owned or driven. Not even close. I have a 12 FX4 with 5.0. Summer beach trip yielded 21.9 mpg when driving in the south (flat) and ended the trip back to WV at 20.6. That was coming through mountains coming back. Winter driving including remote starting every morning and running with zero regard to fuel mileage is high 14's low 15's. Summer average is high 16's low 17's. My drive is mixed rural and interstate and it is flat nowhere. My wife has an 08 Expedition with the 300hp 5.4, 6 speed, and 3.31 gears. It consistently averages 2 mpg less and although it runs well, an impromptu acceleration run up an interstate ramp had the 5.0 putting at least 3 truck lengths from 20 mph to 75 mph. Both of us trying. As a matter of fact punching the truck at 20 mph brought a drop to 1st gear, wheelhop, and traction control kicking in. On top of that, the Expy drops a gear on any incline on the highway. Granted the gears are different between the 2. But at nowhere in the powerband does it feel like it has any more zip than the 5.0. As you can tell, I love my truck. I have zero issues including the mentioned oil burning issues or driveshaft issue someone mentioned. Absolutely trouble free period. As a matter of fact my 5.4's and V10's used more oil between changes than the 5.0. I have had 2 5.4 2v's, 2 V10 2v's, and now 1 5.4 3V. All great motors. But simply in my opinion no comparison to the 5.0.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 08:53 PM
  #15  
04XLTRUNNER's Avatar
04XLTRUNNER
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, TX
I have a 2012 5.0 with zero issues. Was getting 17-18 mpg when it was stock. I now get 13 city, 15.5 highway with the lift and tires. Been a great truck so far. Just passed 33k miles today. Came out of an 09 fx4 5.4 and never looked back.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE