c6 help
Your best option would probably be a manual conversion. The C6 is a vacuum operated transmission, not computer controlled. The other automatics are computer controlled. With that, you will need a harness and an ECM for the transmissions.
Chiming in! AOD, a 4-speed with O/D 4th. gear, is NOT electronically controlled, not connected to computer in any way. It is one of the most unique transmissions designed, in that it has 2 input shafts, but that is a good and bad point, weaker because of small inner shaft diameter. In 1st. and 2nd. gear, the trans. is driven by the torque converter turbine, like all transmissions used to be. However, in 3rd. and 4th. gears, the input to the transmission is taken from the shaft driven by the PUMP, as it's called, in the converter, which means the fluid no longer transmits the driving torque, but rather the engine flywheel (the TC drive member, or pump) provides the torque input to the trans. This eliminates the converter losses in 3rd. and 4th., but still allows normal converter operation in 1st. and 2nd.
This was how Ford eliminated the converter losses by mechanical means, rather than putting a CLUTCH in the converter, as most ALL transmissions do today. Certain drawbacks were present: today's clutched converters can be brought back into play in O/D gear, or any other, to gain more "oomph", which the AOD could only provide by downshifting to lower gears. AOD was used behind just about all of Ford's engines, is a fairly stout transmission. One problem early on was "hunting", shifting back and forth between 3rd. and O/D, if speed was kept at just the right level. This was eliminated by a change to control pressure regulation, sometime in the late '80s.
Overall length of AOD, at least as used in Mustangs, ca 1989 through mid-;90s, was quite similar, maybe identical to other autos, say, C6. If a non-overdrive trans. is replaced by AOD, if length and output shaft splines are same, bolt-in is possibly, with MAYBE some alteration at rear crossmember mount. Most were shifted by a CABLE reaching from the steering column to the trans., except Mustang, which had a floor shift set-up; this might be adaptable more easily if replacing say a C-6. Also, AOD had a MECHANICAL LINK from the throttle linkage to the transmission, which moved at all times with the throttle, to control shift points vs. throttle demand. Thus, that would have to be incorporated, to properly utilize an AOD. Earlier transmissions having a similar throttle-transmission mechanical link, used it solely to FORCE DOWNSHIFTS; usually, the link was motionless regardless of throttle movement, until very near full throttle, at which time the link came into motion.
I used a Mustang AOD when I put a 1992 5.0L HO in a '79 Ranchero. The very low numerical rear axle (2.69, or something like that), made the shift to 3rd. gear feel like a bog-down, since torque converter slip was eliminated. 9-inch rear axle made replacement with a 3.50 gear set easy; the vehicle ran super! impish
Trending Topics
The AOD likely won't hold up in an F250, at least not in stock form if you're using the truck for it's intended purpose.
The E4OD is controlled by the ECM so you'd need one from a 351/E4OD combo or a stand-alone controller. I think the diesel trucks didn't need ECMs so they had stand-alone controllers for E4OD trannys. There would be some work involved in the swap and a significant expense unless you lucked into a cheap parts truck with a fresh tranny.
You can install a gear vendors or similar auxiliary OD unit and this would effectively give you 6 gears which would help out when pulling as load up a hill. This is probably the most expensive but least labor-intensive option.
The ZF5 would take some work but there's lots of write-ups just on this forum so you'll have plenty of info to get it done. And the ZF5 will probably last longer and need less maintenance and attention than an auto.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts



