Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I figured out how to get 4mpg better out of my 94

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-07-2012, 11:32 AM
Green Griffin 420's Avatar
Green Griffin 420
Green Griffin 420 is offline
Senior User

Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alamo, TN
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I figured out how to get 4mpg better out of my 94

If your not already doing this you should give it a try. STOP BUYING GAS WITH ETHANOL!!!!!

Seriously just the switch from ethanol to non ethanol has made my truck run better and given me an extra 4mpg. I'm spending .25 more a gallon and saving about $4.00 a tank.

If you need to know where to find non ethanol gas check here.

Ethanol-free gas stations in the U.S. and Canada
 
  #2  
Old 11-07-2012, 12:39 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
Personally I have never gotten a 4 MPG increase by using non-blended fuel. My calculations on 4-5 different vehicles show an approximately savings of $2-$3 per tankful based on $.08 price difference, ~16 gallon tank and ~1-1.5 better MPGs using "straight" gasoline.

Sadly no one is offering non-blended 87 or 89 octane fuel anymore in my area. No way I would ever consider 91/93 octane non-blended. The price we pay in the name of progress.
 
  #3  
Old 11-07-2012, 12:46 PM
Green Griffin 420's Avatar
Green Griffin 420
Green Griffin 420 is offline
Senior User

Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alamo, TN
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rla2005
Personally I have never gotten a 4 MPG increase by using non-blended fuel. My calculations on 4-5 different vehicles show an approximately savings of $2-$3 per tankful based on $.08 price difference, ~16 gallon tank and ~1-1.5 better MPGs using "straight" gasoline.

Sadly no one is offering non-blended 87 or 89 octane fuel anymore in my area. No way I would ever consider 91/93 octane non-blended. The price we pay in the name of progress.
I was getting around 11mpg (10.7-11.3) on average and now it's up to 14.7 on the last fill up. Mine has duel tanks for about 25gal.
 
  #4  
Old 11-07-2012, 01:19 PM
ewalt98's Avatar
ewalt98
ewalt98 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bitterroots of Montana
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've never tested in my 88, but in my 03, I get about 1mpg better with non-ethanol gas.
Actually, it is probably even less since I tend to drive more aggressively with non-ethanol gas, and more conservatively with ethanol gas.....
 
  #5  
Old 11-07-2012, 05:48 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,586
Received 1,164 Likes on 919 Posts
Originally Posted by Green Griffin 420
I was getting around 11mpg (10.7-11.3) on average and now it's up to 14.7 on the last fill up. Mine has duel tanks for about 25gal.
Congrats! Great results. As I stated previously I have not gotten that much of a MPG improvement using straight gasoline. I was really bummed when the last hold-out for regular 87 octane fuel switch to ethanol blend recently

I ran multiple back-to-back tests on these vehicles over the years:

1993 F150 Lightning (2)
1992 F350 w/5.8L
2004 Dodge Intrepid w/3.5L
2005 Dodge Stratus w/3.0L
2004 Excursion w/6.8L

All them responded with consistent 1-1.5 MPG improvement using non-blended fuel.
 
  #6  
Old 11-07-2012, 06:12 PM
Austine's Avatar
Austine
Austine is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's sad to think too that soon, we won't have a choice between straight fuel and blended fuel. With my 302 that I had in my 91 f150, with one cylinder not working, going about 55 I was averaging 15-16 mpg on straight, and only 12-13 on blended
 
  #7  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:35 PM
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
GoinBoarding is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Laramie, WY
Posts: 3,103
Received 161 Likes on 129 Posts
Ethanol has about 70% the energy content of straight gasoline. Blended fuel is 10% ethanol tops. 0.7(10)+1.0(90)=97% energy of straight fuel. So you should see about a 3% hit to fuel mileage running 10%EtOH blended fuel. My mileage does drop with blended fuel, but only by 0.5-1.0mpg, about on par with the reduced energy content.

There are many places where you can't buy non-blended fuel anymore. In my town, there are a couple stations, but they are probably going to vanish eventually. In MN, if you find non-blended fuel (I know of 1 pump waay up north), the pump is labeled "For Collector Cars or OffHighway Use Only" such a joke.

As a side note, I think EtOH is a better oxidant in our fuel than MTBE (due to its groundwater contamination), but no way is E85 a good idea, nor is increasing to a 20% EtOH blend. Besides all that, blended fuel is HELL on small high performance engines.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2011FX2Crazy
2009 - 2014 F150
112
08-08-2015 01:50 AM
Nanook8
2009 - 2014 F150
23
11-14-2009 09:17 PM
pile_53574
Alternative Fuels, Hybrids & Mileage
15
06-04-2007 11:00 PM
TRX250R87
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
1
07-24-2006 04:45 PM
subhuman
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
8
03-12-2003 12:55 PM



Quick Reply: I figured out how to get 4mpg better out of my 94



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.