When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If this has been previously discussed, please put this down as a problem I've inherited. But, I was just looking at the front of the new LMC catalog that has a bit of a description re the changes year-by-year and thought that having something like that would be very helpful. But, it could go far, FAR beyond what LMC has to include things like:
When one engine was phased in and another out
When certain options were available
The changes from, say, the 1G alternator to a 2G
Differences in transmissions available,
etc
What are your thoughts? We'd need to have a keeper for that, someone who really knows the stuff, but he could take suggestions from the rest of us on content.
Only issue I can see is who would be the authority on what is factual and what is incorrect?
It would have to be people who both know a LOT about these trucks as well as somone who knows what he doesn't know. Several people come to mind, although I'm not sure I should mention any "names" at the moment.
Or, maybe we could do it by years with an agreed format. Know anyone knowledgeable about the 1980 trucks?
Originally Posted by khadma
I tried Asking admin to make a Wikipedia like
Section, maybe if there was more interest.
We should poll FTE.
This would be for all trucks though.
I don't think should be an all-FTE thing or we'll not get it off the ground. I'm thinking each forum should do their own. And, while it would be wiki-like, I'm thinking we would want one person in charge instead of letting anyone, or even several, for that matter. Perhaps individuals would forward suggestions to the person responsible, with documentation if needed.
Would this be something like part interchange, or something more along the lines of general purpose?
General Purpose:
1980-1981: Ford letters on hood, Custom, Ranger, Ranger XLT, Ranger Lariat etc...
1982 was the change of grilles to the Blue oval type, Base, XL, XLT, Lariat etc...
Parts interchange:
1980-1981 Slide-lock door locks
1981-1986 Push/pull type locks
1980 Headlamp switch
1981-1986 headlamps switch
1981-1986 Power windows/ Doors locks/ Mirrors etc...
As for authority on what was accurate and what wasn't, I would suggest to rely on the Parts books, wiring diagrams, owners manuals and the Brochures as guidelines.
Would this be something like part interchange, or something more along the lines of general purpose?
General Purpose:
1980-1981: Ford letters on hood, Custom, Ranger, Ranger XLT, Ranger Lariat etc...
1982 was the change of grilles to the Blue oval type, Base, XL, XLT, Lariat etc...
Parts interchange:
1980-1981 Slide-lock door locks
1981-1986 Push/pull type locks
1980 Headlamp switch
1981-1986 headlamps switch
1981-1986 Power windows/ Doors locks/ Mirrors etc...
As for authority on what was accurate and what wasn't, I would suggest to rely on the Parts books, wiring diagrams, owners manuals and the Brochures as guidelines.
Very good question! I was originally thinking the GP approach, but can see a use for PI as well. Maybe we need more input.
And, I would agree the documentation should rule, but there are mistakes in at least the master parts catalog, if not elsewhere. So, I could see countering a mistaken document if we had proof.
The vacuum selectors in these trucks seemed to have changed at some point. I was looking for one for my 1982 (w/ factory AC) and I found a 1986 (w/ factory AC) and it was different. Unless that was my imagination.
The vacuum selectors in these trucks seemed to have changed at some point. I was looking for one for my 1982 (w/ factory AC) and I found a 1986 (w/ factory AC) and it was different. Unless that was my imagination.
Good example. They did change and you need the vacuum lines that go with them.
And, I would agree the documentation should rule, but there are mistakes in at least the master parts catalog, if not elsewhere. So, I could see countering a mistaken document if we had proof.
Yes, there are a few mistakes in the parts books. Infact my older printing of the parts book, contradicts certain things in the latest printing and visa versa.
Why I would use all of the resources avaliable as guidlines.
Ok, what if we did the more simple one first, the general purpose one? Then, if that goes well maybe move on to the parts interchange one? And, there may be some spill-over, such as it might be that to help someone determine if he has an 80 vs an 81 the description has to explain which each had.
Or, maybe I should say it differently: What if the purpose of the first one is as a spotter's guide? IOW, to help us know the differences between the years, what changed each year, or what changed mid-year.
Does any of that make any sense? Or, is there a better purpose?
So help the man who gets to write the 1980 section.
I have someone in mind for that. Actually, I'm wondering about some kind of a team. What about someone to do the 80-81 trucks, and someone else to do the rest?
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.