What kind of mileage are you 6.2 owners getting while towing ?
#1
What kind of mileage are you 6.2 owners getting while towing ?
Thinking on getting one, I'm a diesel guy but Ford's offerings in that fall far short and the older ones are far from reliable now (got a 99 SD with a 7.3 now) to make long trips. My "other truck" is a 95 F150 with a 351 & E4OD I't ain't got the ***** for towing a travel trailer, nor the mileage either for long trips (got 6-8 mpg coming back from Colorado towing a T/Trl). In town mileage does not concern me, I haul gas (and diesel) and never buy the stuff, the boss supplys it for me. Lets here what y'all are getting out on the road towing.
#2
If you are getting a 6.2 for milage...you are getting the wrong engine.
Here is a link to someone asking the same question.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...r-mileage.html
Here is a link to someone asking the same question.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...r-mileage.html
#3
I'd make a bet that the 6.2 gets at least the same if not better towing mileage than the eb. Even if you don't you're not running 8-10mpg's worth of fuel through 213 cubic inches.
#4
It comes down to:
What does one want the most?
What kind of driving do you do the most?
Is fuel economy the most important concern over the life and employment of the truck?
Not knocking the 6.2L, it's a great choice for sure. But, what's the difference if you're feeding a 213 CI engine or a 380 CI engine and you're getting very similar power numbers?
#5
If you are getting a 6.2 for milage...you are getting the wrong engine.
Here is a link to someone asking the same question.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...r-mileage.html
Here is a link to someone asking the same question.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...r-mileage.html
#6
On the other hand, you're not going to get 22+ out of a 6.2L while cruising empty.
It comes down to:
What does one want the most?
What kind of driving do you do the most?
Is fuel economy the most important concern over the life and employment of the truck?
Not knocking the 6.2L, it's a great choice for sure. But, what's the difference if you're feeding a 213 CI engine or a 380 CI engine and you're getting very similar power numbers?
It comes down to:
What does one want the most?
What kind of driving do you do the most?
Is fuel economy the most important concern over the life and employment of the truck?
Not knocking the 6.2L, it's a great choice for sure. But, what's the difference if you're feeding a 213 CI engine or a 380 CI engine and you're getting very similar power numbers?
Trending Topics
#8
Your rudeness isn't appreciated, this is a friendly forum. Your question contradicts itself. You ask for towing MPG's and then you mention a couple times that gas mileage isn't an issue as you're not paying for it.
This is an open forum and EVERYONE has a right to weigh in. It's up to you to choose the info that satisfies your query.
In the future sir, if you're trying to capture a particular audience, then try posting to a narrower forum such as the 6.2L forum for this instance.
Good day sir.
#9
Your rudeness isn't appreciated, this is a friendly forum. Your question contradicts itself. You ask for towing MPG's and then you mention a couple times that gas mileage isn't an issue as you're not paying for it.
This is an open forum and EVERYONE has a right to weigh in. It's up to you to choose the info that satisfies your query.
In the future sir, if you're trying to capture a particular audience, then try posting to a narrower forum such as the 6.2L forum for this instance.
Good day sir.
This is an open forum and EVERYONE has a right to weigh in. It's up to you to choose the info that satisfies your query.
In the future sir, if you're trying to capture a particular audience, then try posting to a narrower forum such as the 6.2L forum for this instance.
Good day sir.
#10
Your question has many answers. Are you towing 2 goose feathers on a flat runway or 10000# through the mountains? The 6.2 seems to get anywhere from mid single digits to mid teens regardless of towing or empty. Question answered, now lets address another issue...
I'll put up a fight for the Ecoboost... I don't care what the mileage is with either of the engines, but when MAX TRAILER TOWING CAPACITY presents itself with the Ecoboost V6, shove your "truck has to have a v8" attitude up your behind and allow the tiny assed kawasaki v6 prove that is is capable beyond many of our needs. I'll bet if you were to face the fact that a large V8 engine doesn't compensate for something lacking in your bodily composition, you would quite enjoy the feeling of the twin turbo'd Ecoboost.
I'll put up a fight for the Ecoboost... I don't care what the mileage is with either of the engines, but when MAX TRAILER TOWING CAPACITY presents itself with the Ecoboost V6, shove your "truck has to have a v8" attitude up your behind and allow the tiny assed kawasaki v6 prove that is is capable beyond many of our needs. I'll bet if you were to face the fact that a large V8 engine doesn't compensate for something lacking in your bodily composition, you would quite enjoy the feeling of the twin turbo'd Ecoboost.
#12
There is just no need! Time to grow up guys!
As to the Ecoboost, I am sure that it is a brilliant engine. Great power and decent mileage. Testing aside only time will determine just how durable the engine is.
The question I ask is what happens to the savings in fuel after you loose a turbo after six or so years? I drive 20000 miles a year. If I average 15mpg I use about 1333 gallons of fuel. Now say I buy an Ecoboost and my average goes up to 18 mpg for the same 20000 miles. Now I use just 1111 gallons of fuel a year. 222 gallons of fuel saved. At current local prices that equates to abour $825 a year in savings.
Repairs at retail for a failed turbocharger could eat up most or even all of those savings.
I have spent 30 + years maintaining/repairing turbo engines and I've seen a few turbo failures.....
Only time will tell.
#13
This is the kind of remark that makes me think twice about visiting any forum.....
There is just no need! Time to grow up guys!
As to the Ecoboost, I am sure that it is a brilliant engine. Great power and decent mileage. Testing aside only time will determine just how durable the engine is.
The question I ask is what happens to the savings in fuel after you loose a turbo after six or so years? I drive 20000 miles a year. If I average 15mpg I use about 1333 gallons of fuel. Now say I buy an Ecoboost and my average goes up to 18 mpg for the same 20000 miles. Now I use just 1111 gallons of fuel a year. 222 gallons of fuel saved. At current local prices that equates to abour $825 a year in savings.
Repairs at retail for a failed turbocharger could eat up most or even all of those savings.
I have spent 30 + years maintaining/repairing turbo engines and I've seen a few turbo failures.....
Only time will tell.
There is just no need! Time to grow up guys!
As to the Ecoboost, I am sure that it is a brilliant engine. Great power and decent mileage. Testing aside only time will determine just how durable the engine is.
The question I ask is what happens to the savings in fuel after you loose a turbo after six or so years? I drive 20000 miles a year. If I average 15mpg I use about 1333 gallons of fuel. Now say I buy an Ecoboost and my average goes up to 18 mpg for the same 20000 miles. Now I use just 1111 gallons of fuel a year. 222 gallons of fuel saved. At current local prices that equates to abour $825 a year in savings.
Repairs at retail for a failed turbocharger could eat up most or even all of those savings.
I have spent 30 + years maintaining/repairing turbo engines and I've seen a few turbo failures.....
Only time will tell.
#14
Your question has many answers. Are you towing 2 goose feathers on a flat runway or 10000# through the mountains? The 6.2 seems to get anywhere from mid single digits to mid teens regardless of towing or empty. Question answered, now lets address another issue...
I CAN TELL JUST BY THIS QUESTION THAT YOU'RE CLUELESS. TOWING 10000 LBS THRU THE MOUNTAINS IS A CAKE WALK COMPARED TO TOWING A LIGHTER WEIGHT TRAILER THAT'S GOT THE AERODYNAMICS OF A BRICK WALL ACROSS THE WIDE OPEN SPACES OF SAY, WEST TEXAS WHEN YOU'VE GOT A 75% CHANCE THAT YOU'VE GOT A HEADWIND OR CROSSWIND. THE MOUNTAIN DRIVING WILL YEILD BETTER MILEAGE NUMBERS EVERYTIME AS YOU'RE ONLY USING FUEL 50% OF THE TIME WHEN GOING UPHILL.
I'll put up a fight for the Ecoboost... I don't care what the mileage is with either of the engines, but when MAX TRAILER TOWING CAPACITY presents itself with the Ecoboost V6, shove your "truck has to have a v8" attitude up your behind and allow the tiny assed kawasaki v6 prove that is is capable beyond many of our needs. I'll bet if you were to face the fact that a large V8 engine doesn't compensate for something lacking in your bodily composition, you would quite enjoy the feeling of the twin turbo'd Ecoboost.
I CAN TELL JUST BY THIS QUESTION THAT YOU'RE CLUELESS. TOWING 10000 LBS THRU THE MOUNTAINS IS A CAKE WALK COMPARED TO TOWING A LIGHTER WEIGHT TRAILER THAT'S GOT THE AERODYNAMICS OF A BRICK WALL ACROSS THE WIDE OPEN SPACES OF SAY, WEST TEXAS WHEN YOU'VE GOT A 75% CHANCE THAT YOU'VE GOT A HEADWIND OR CROSSWIND. THE MOUNTAIN DRIVING WILL YEILD BETTER MILEAGE NUMBERS EVERYTIME AS YOU'RE ONLY USING FUEL 50% OF THE TIME WHEN GOING UPHILL.
I'll put up a fight for the Ecoboost... I don't care what the mileage is with either of the engines, but when MAX TRAILER TOWING CAPACITY presents itself with the Ecoboost V6, shove your "truck has to have a v8" attitude up your behind and allow the tiny assed kawasaki v6 prove that is is capable beyond many of our needs. I'll bet if you were to face the fact that a large V8 engine doesn't compensate for something lacking in your bodily composition, you would quite enjoy the feeling of the twin turbo'd Ecoboost.
#15
This is the kind of remark that makes me think twice about visiting any forum.....
There is just no need! Time to grow up guys!
As to the Ecoboost, I am sure that it is a brilliant engine. Great power and decent mileage. Testing aside only time will determine just how durable the engine is.
The question I ask is what happens to the savings in fuel after you loose a turbo after six or so years? I drive 20000 miles a year. If I average 15mpg I use about 1333 gallons of fuel. Now say I buy an Ecoboost and my average goes up to 18 mpg for the same 20000 miles. Now I use just 1111 gallons of fuel a year. 222 gallons of fuel saved. At current local prices that equates to abour $825 a year in savings.
Repairs at retail for a failed turbocharger could eat up most or even all of those savings.
I have spent 30 + years maintaining/repairing turbo engines and I've seen a few turbo failures.....
Only time will tell.
There is just no need! Time to grow up guys!
As to the Ecoboost, I am sure that it is a brilliant engine. Great power and decent mileage. Testing aside only time will determine just how durable the engine is.
The question I ask is what happens to the savings in fuel after you loose a turbo after six or so years? I drive 20000 miles a year. If I average 15mpg I use about 1333 gallons of fuel. Now say I buy an Ecoboost and my average goes up to 18 mpg for the same 20000 miles. Now I use just 1111 gallons of fuel a year. 222 gallons of fuel saved. At current local prices that equates to abour $825 a year in savings.
Repairs at retail for a failed turbocharger could eat up most or even all of those savings.
I have spent 30 + years maintaining/repairing turbo engines and I've seen a few turbo failures.....
Only time will tell.
To the OP:
If you have been towing that long then you know that fuel milage is a very subjective issue depending on the terrain you drive and what exactly you are hauling...not to mention the frontal area of what you are hauling. What I might get for fuel milage will not be the same as you. Give the guys here a break...they are only trying to be helpful and my link was trying to help you get some kind of answer that you were looking for.