Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

360 engine vs 352 or 302?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 09:14 AM
  #16  
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 80
From: tujunga, calif
I think another difference is the crap they sell us for fuel now as compared to the old leaded when the trucks were new. I know both of my trucks and my car dropped about 2mpg from what they use to get.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #17  
MIKES 68 F100's Avatar
MIKES 68 F100
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 54
From: Antelope Valley ,CA
that would be the ethanol
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 10:17 AM
  #18  
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 80
From: tujunga, calif
Originally Posted by MIKES 68 F100
that would be the ethanol
I'm sure it is. I don't know what they put in the fuel in Arizona but my truck hated it. On my way to New Mexico I had to stop and retard the timing twice. It ran alright in New Mexico but I had to do it again on the return trip when I filled up in Arizona..
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 10:47 AM
  #19  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Forget an engine change unless you already have a donor vehicle sitting there to pull a complete powertrain from, without changing anything else on the truck the single best thing you can do (meaning the best gains/cost ratio) is to swap in an overdrive transmission. No that probably won't make as much difference as swapping in a more modern EFI motor with an OD trans, but that's a lot more money and work and will take much longer to get your return on investment back in saved fuel.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 04:34 PM
  #20  
FECruzer69's Avatar
FECruzer69
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
When I first bought my truck it had a 390-2V engine with a 3-spd Warner T-85N overdrive tranny and what I believe to be a 3.54:1 rear gear. Before I rebuilt my engine I was curious about what kind of mileage it was getting. I checked it using the "run it dry, add one gallon and see how far it goes" method. Yeah, I like doing things the hard way. LOL. Anyway, I found that it was getting 11 mpg (city) in light evening traffic.
After rebuilding my engine I added dual 2.25" exhausts with turbo mufflers. I also added an open element chrome air breather, an Accel Supercoil, new plug wires and a set of Accel "U-groove" spark plugs. I also remember experimenting and going down one or two jet sizes.
All of these changes gave me around a 2 mpg increase in fuel economy and a noticable increase in power.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 03:04 AM
  #21  
68cabby's Avatar
68cabby
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Better mpgs out of a 352...probably not since they're the same basic engine..just longer stroke. As said before..a 302 is more of a car engine. In these heavy bricks..a stock 302 would probably not be much better..maybe 3-5 mpg difference since it would be straining to get it moving more. A nice tune up and clean out should get you up to the 11-14 mpg highway on a good day. A food can of seafoam through the oil and fuel would do good to degum the lines. Proper tire size and inflation help too. Sparkplug..timing..wires..etc also help and it all adds up little by little. I had a 360 and it got 12 highway..I was never worried because I knew that this truck wasn't a hybrid or a 4 cylinder Hyundai. It is a 68 ford f100 with a granny 4 and 360 Fe and whatever mpg it got..it got. As mentioned dozens of times..these are lead sleds. We drive them for nostalgia..not mpgs!
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 07:54 PM
  #22  
FECruzer69's Avatar
FECruzer69
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FECruzer69
When I first bought my truck it had a 390-2V engine with a 3-spd Warner T-85N overdrive tranny and what I believe to be a 3.54:1 rear gear. Before I rebuilt my engine I was curious about what kind of mileage it was getting. I checked it using the "run it dry, add one gallon and see how far it goes" method. Yeah, I like doing things the hard way. LOL. Anyway, I found that it was getting 11 mpg (city) in light evening traffic.
After rebuilding my engine I added dual 2.25" exhausts with turbo mufflers. I also added an open element chrome air breather, an Accel Supercoil, new plug wires and a set of Accel "U-groove" spark plugs. I also remember experimenting and going down one or two jet sizes.
All of these changes gave me around a 2 mpg increase in fuel economy and a noticable increase in power.
Oops! Sorry, I should have mentioned that 11 mpg (city) was in Canadian gallons, so probably 8-9 mpg in U.S. gallons. Yes, little things like proper fuel mixture, proper plug and point gap, new rotor, cap and wires definitely do help. Mods like low restriction air breathers and free-flowing mufflers/exhaust systems can help too.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2013 | 08:47 AM
  #23  
busy161's Avatar
busy161
New User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Don't know why you guys call these trucks "bricks" Mine is not a brick. It runs hard. I had a 70 2wd long bed sports custom with 428 6V and it ran hard. I had it up 125 MPH plus racing a new, at the time, Chevy truck in 1994 down the interstate in Wyoming. The Chevy "like a rock" was left behind. My 69 Shorty Ranger with high perf 390 will blow over a 100 mph fairly easy and fast. If yours is a brick that is your fault. Gas mph is 10 -12 with what ever motor you put in. Get over it or get a Prius.....
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Jan 6, 2013 | 09:15 AM
  #24  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 74
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by busy161
Don't know why you guys call these trucks "bricks" Mine is not a brick. It runs hard. I had a 70 2wd long bed sports custom with 428 6V and it ran hard. I had it up 125 MPH plus racing a new, at the time, Chevy truck in 1994 down the interstate in Wyoming. The Chevy "like a rock" was left behind. My 69 Shorty Ranger with high perf 390 will blow over a 100 mph fairly easy and fast. If yours is a brick that is your fault. Gas mph is 10 -12 with what ever motor you put in. Get over it or get a Prius.....
They are bricks because of no aero design. Square grill areas steep windshields. No wind cutting at all.

Sorry bub, your 69 like all others of this era is a brick. Most of the FE powered ones would run the numbers on the speedo, mine does, but it aint splitting the air partials & getting 25 mpg.




John
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2013 | 09:22 AM
  #25  
busy161's Avatar
busy161
New User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Funny I had a 99 f-150 that was not a brick according to your description. It had 5.4 triton. It got 11-12 mpg. So sorry Bub, you can call your truck what ever you want, Mine is not a brick.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2013 | 09:32 AM
  #26  
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
Fleet Owner
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 24,552
Likes: 74
From: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Club FTE Silver Member

OK Nottabrick. You made a reference to a term that we use and referred why. You don't like the response. None of the Ford trucks have much aero design.

You can call your truck a her if you want.



John
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 11:08 PM
  #27  
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
Alvin in AZ
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 8
From: Gadsden Purchase
My 133" '75 F150 360FE +T18 is a Bump under its ugly-Dented skin. ;)

With 3.25 Traction Lok rear axle ratio, 235/85-16E's on 7" wide wheels.

A fresh rebuild + 252/252 Comp "economy" cam I got a solid 13+mpg.
No kidding, that's compensating for the odometer being off by 12.8%.

As the engine's got tired (~95k on the rebuild) it's dropped to ~12mpg
and that's the best it -ever- did from brand new! But it's still got more
power and starts better and gets better oil mileage and just plain runs
better than it ever did from new still... with ~95k miles on the rebuild. :)

Hey, the original cam timing sucked, what can I say? LOL :)

If I were to swap engines for MPG, I'd swap in a 300-i6 :) !!
YMMV <-- like puns? ;)

All I'd need is a bellhousing to match the 300i6 and T18, easy enough to
find I bet. But don't -know- that. ;) If you got-and/or-like automatics...

You're on your own. ;)

Engine perches are the same. FE = 300i6

Alvin in AZ
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 11:20 PM
  #28  
68cabby's Avatar
68cabby
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by busy161
Don't know why you guys call these trucks "bricks" Mine is not a brick. It runs hard. I had a 70 2wd long bed sports custom with 428 6V and it ran hard. I had it up 125 MPH plus racing a new, at the time, Chevy truck in 1994 down the interstate in Wyoming. The Chevy "like a rock" was left behind. My 69 Shorty Ranger with high perf 390 will blow over a 100 mph fairly easy and fast. If yours is a brick that is your fault. Gas mph is 10 -12 with what ever motor you put in. Get over it or get a Prius.....
call it what you may...were calling it a brick and I believe the consensus is to do so. By "brick" we don't mean slow or that it can't lay rubber..especially with a 428..but as John said....the weight to power ratio is a lil on the lowside..especially what SHOULD be from big engines like fes..but they were made to pull. And he's right..these trucks have pretty much the aerodynamics of a big brick wall travelling at 70 mph..
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 11:32 PM
  #29  
68cabby's Avatar
68cabby
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Alvin in AZ
My 133" '75 F150 360FE +T18 is a Bump under its ugly-Dented skin.

With 3.25 Traction Lok rear axle ratio, 235/85-16E's on 7" wide wheels.

A fresh rebuild + 252/252 Comp "economy" cam I got a solid 13+mpg.
No kidding, that's compensating for the odometer being off by 12.8%.

As the engine's got tired (~95k on the rebuild) it's dropped to ~12mpg
and that's the best it -ever- did from brand new! But it's still got more
power and starts better and gets better oil mileage and just plain runs
better than it ever did from new still... with ~95k miles on the rebuild.

Hey, the original cam timing sucked, what can I say? LOL

If I were to swap engines for MPG, I'd swap in a 300-i6 !!
YMMV <-- like puns?

All I'd need is a bellhousing to match the 300i6 and T18, easy enough to
find I bet. But don't -know- that. If you got-and/or-like automatics...

You're on your own.

Engine perches are the same. FE = 300i6

Alvin in AZ
After my 360 went kaputt..I decided to go the 300 route because an old buddy had a fresh one in his garage. He opted for a 302 and I decided to make this 300 a monster Comp Cams cam..lifters..springs and steel gears..dual exhaust..Offenhauser 4bbl intake with a 600 cfm edelbrock carb..the only thing I have yet to do is shave the deck and do a little porting on the head..but that engine will be anything from economical now haha.
I had a hard time at first finding a bellhousing..but a 302/351w bellhousing is the one to use. All their manual trannys have the same butterfly square pattern to bolt to the tranny.
And I agree about the cam timing..most engines were so retarded (no pun intended) that they ran worse and got less mpgs.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013 | 07:00 AM
  #30  
1972RedNeck's Avatar
1972RedNeck
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,522
Likes: 11
From: Townsend, MT
Originally Posted by rustywheel68
what carb/intake are you running? if gas mileage is your goal, you should be using a 2-barrel.
A small 4 barrel would be better. When cruising, the air going through the venturis is at a higher velocity, increasing efficiency and throttle response.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE