Fuel additive
I started using Ford's first and have switched to Optilube XPD a few months ago. Here was my reasoning: I would prefer to use the best product and not have to be in the warranty fight than to end up there and be saying "but I used your additive".
Why do I think that Optilube is the best? Because of the only study out there that I am aware of......the 2007 Spicer study. Yes it is old but it is all we have until another one is done, any other speculation on well "this shop told me to use this" is just that.....speculation. I don't think they conducted a blind study to determine that. I was looking for facts...period. In the Spicer test Optilube XPD was ranked #2 out of the 19 additives tested only behind 2% bio that ranked #1. Stanadyne was ranked #8. This was only comparing lubrication not cetane boosting.
On your milage question with Optilube, I would say it is not worse that Ford's, maybe a little better. With winter fuel I am seeing 15-16 around town, I get 23 on the highway which seems better for winter fuel. My main concern is keeping the engine healthy and if I can get a few extra mpg then great.
And by no means do I say that the others are not good, I just want to use, what I think, is the best. I would also be using 2% bio but nobody sells it in my area.
Hope this helps.
I started using Ford's first and have switched to Optilube XPD a few months ago. Here was my reasoning: I would prefer to use the best product and not have to be in the warranty fight than to end up there and be saying "but I used your additive".
Why do I think that Optilube is the best? Because of the only study out there that I am aware of......the 2007 Spicer study. Yes it is old but it is all we have until another one is done, any other speculation on well "this shop told me to use this" is just that.....speculation. I don't think they conducted a blind study to determine that. I was looking for facts...period. In the Spicer test Optilube XPD was ranked #2 out of the 19 additives tested only behind 2% bio that ranked #1. Stanadyne was ranked #8. This was only comparing lubrication not cetane boosting.
On your milage question with Optilube, I would say it is not worse that Ford's, maybe a little better. With winter fuel I am seeing 15-16 around town, I get 23 on the highway which seems better for winter fuel. My main concern is keeping the engine healthy and if I can get a few extra mpg then great.
And by no means do I say that the others are not good, I just want to use, what I think, is the best. I would also be using 2% bio but nobody sells it in my area.
Hope this helps.[/QUOT
Thanks for the info.
About to switch to Optilube summer blend in another few weeks. Save myself a bit per tank while the weather is warm.
---Aaron
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Being new to Diesels I am learning quite a lot from all you guys!
I read all of these posts and tracked down the Spicer review document from 2007 and did some additional reading.
I finally decided that unless I spend a lot of time up north in the winter, the Opti-Lube summer blend would be just fine for me down here in Florida.
I looked all over for it online and it turns out that the best price (even with the FedEx ground shipping was from Opti-Lube.
$55.95 / gallon plus $12.28 shipping. A better price than anything else I found online. Plus, it includes the 16 oz dispenser bottle.
Doing the math, that's $68.23 / 1280 (1oz/10 gals = 1280 gals) = $0.053 or just over 5 cents per gallon.
At Diesel costing over $4/gallon, another 5 cents / gallon is chump change.
It comes out to just over $1 / tankfull.
Here's a link to their product order site.
Products
Last edited by skscci; Mar 21, 2012 at 08:43 PM. Reason: Did the math.
However, considering the issue that has come up with the HPFP this is cheap insurance until it gets figured out. And if I am getting only a little extra mpg then it really doesn't cost me much of anything. Do I think it is a widespread problem, no, (HPFP failures) but I am not ready but to a $10,000 bet on it.
If you haven't already you may want to review the threads on the HPFP failures. (Bring a few beers or a lot of coffee because they are a lot of reading) Then see if your view on the additives changes or not.
This engine does not appear to handle whatever you throw in the tank like older diesels would. If you use the same ideas and tricks people have used with older engines you may get a very expensive lesson.
Do some research and then see what you think. Just some friendly advice, take it or leave it. Most of all congrats on the new truck.
We will each have our own risk tolerance, and therefore make different decisions, but fear seems to be the root cause of much of the marketing of some of these products. Some appear to be making a lot of money off of our fears.
All that said, the info on additives is useful for considetation.
Cheers
However, considering the issue that has come up with the HPFP this is cheap insurance until it gets figured out. And if I am getting only a little extra mpg then it really doesn't cost me much of anything. Do I think it is a widespread problem, no, (HPFP failures) but I am not ready but to a $10,000 bet on it.
If you haven't already you may want to review the threads on the HPFP failures. (Bring a few beers or a lot of coffee because they are a lot of reading) Then see if your view on the additives changes or not.
This engine does not appear to handle whatever you throw in the tank like older diesels would. If you use the same ideas and tricks people have used with older engines you may get a very expensive lesson.
Do some research and then see what you think. Just some friendly advice, take it or leave it. Most of all congrats on the new truck.
The failure rate is very low, unless it's your truck! I'm with others to use the Ford product for a warrented vehicle. Simply to help defend your own case in the event of a failure. Like anything else in life, do the best you can and quit worrying about it.



