the new,new math...
My daughter who will enter college this fall as a pre med student has taken AP level classes all through HS. The work load that she brings home daily is staggering but it is preparing her for the next level.
The thing that ticks me off about her HS education is the lack of history that she's learned over the years. They tend to skim over the things that were once considered important.
I am a 27 year public school teacher and although I understand and absolutely approve the idea of mixing math with history to help demonstrate relevance to other material learned in school, surely there must be a less inflammatory way of doing so.
http://ww2.ajcmobile.com/autojuice/?...l-1296640.html
I am a 27 year public school teacher and although I understand and absolutely approve the idea of mixing math with history to help demonstrate relevance to other material learned in school, surely there must be a less inflammatory way of doing so.
Parents protest at school over slave math lesson
I am 21 years old.
To date, I have never been paid a dime to do something I learned how to do in school. Yeah algebra can be useful, but how many times a day do you use algebra compared to how many times you do something else that you wish you'd learned the easy way. They should teach skills MOST PEOPLE will need on an everyday basis, like winterizing a lawnmower or signing a lease.
I am a Civil Engineer and I get paid very well to use the education I received - including algebra, geometry, calculus and even the English classes I hated way back when. Even those "useless" history classes come in handy now and then. And I would say that not a day goes by that I don't have to call on something from my educational past and apply it to what I am working on.
As for "every day" skills like winterizing a lawnmower or signing a lease? Well, I make enough money that I can hire a minimum wage high school dropout who didn't want to learn algebra to winterize my lawnmower and have a lawyer on retainer to review a lease before I sign it.
Obviously, I believe that eventually I'll be paid more because of my college education, but I don't necessarily believe that what I learned will be useful. I'm studying Environmental Planning, which while not an Engineering degree is certainly much closer to it than an English degree in terms of usefulness. That said, two of the part-time jobs I have right now I only have because I'm a college student, but that's not to say that I use what I've learned at school. College is required for a lot of jobs not because of the technical knowledge that may come with it, but because it means you have the skills to get through 4 years of thought exercises.
Again, I would drop out of school if I didn't think I'd be paid for it eventually. But two things are important to consider here: 1) The job market sucks at the moment, and 2) what's taught in schools is not as relevant or useful as it once was.
My greater point is that school should maximize the productivity of all students. You can hire somoeone to do your work, good for you. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. However, too large a proportion of our society does not have marketable skills they learned in school, despite near-universal school attendance. The guy you hire to winterize your lawnmower no doubt did attend school at some point, and for that ~10k a year cost to society he should have learned a marketable skill.
For these simply explained reasons, education is critical. Too many people think that just by getting through high school or a 2 or 4 year trade school or a 4 year college degree that they are automatically job worthy.
The fact is they are ready to apply for a job, but then they must apply themselves and all the knowledge they bring to the table to the job they have obtained.










