When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I knew id get crap over a dana 30, the reasons i plan to use a dana 30 are that its a ranger not fullsize, its a good length, and when its breaks there cheap and easy to find.
I would love to use a dana 44 but there overpriced and usaully to long
What year Ranger is this? My first thought is how rediculous it is to spend the time/money doing an SAS with an axle that is already smaller than what you have now. I broke stuff pretty easily with my Ranger and 33s, 35s were even worse.
Id really spend a little time looking for a set of EB axles - preferably one that came with disk brakes on the 44 up front. 76-77? or was it 75 also?
negative. i kindly told the op to shove it because even with a d30 hydro was pissing money away because you're still limited to 35's or less(and still breaking everything) which the stock p/s and box can handle.
Wow, I need to start reading the off road forum section more. Pretty entertaining. I would agree that the hydraulic steering on something that small is a terrible idea.
Wow, I need to start reading the off road forum section more. Pretty entertaining. I would agree that the hydraulic steering on something that small is a terrible idea.