Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Here we go.....again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 12-01-2011, 03:15 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
When CR rated the Honda Ridgeline as the best pickup, IMO...their credibility sank to a new low. Ridiculous!

It's a unit-body, based off the Honda Pilot...so it's next to worthless except as a grocery getter, or for hauling plants home from Home Depot.

It's also hideously ugly...almost as bad as the double ugly Pontiac Aztec.

The Ridgeline's sales have been so poor recently, ditto the Honda Element, both are slated to be cancelled.
 
  #47  
Old 12-05-2011, 10:18 AM
nobrandx's Avatar
nobrandx
nobrandx is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gt. Falls, MT
Posts: 242
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Ed, did you buy your truck at Bison Ford?
 
  #48  
Old 12-06-2011, 06:36 PM
truckerdude's Avatar
truckerdude
truckerdude is offline
Junior User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[quote=tseekins;11098358]But the thing is gentlemen, most of here are getting the advertised numbers out of our EB trucks running 70+ when possible. There are some exceptions like in Ed's case where the truck just doesn't seem to want to cooperate.

The only thing that bugs me is that this thread will become poor advertising for Ford. Someone will Google Ecoboost MPG and this thread is likely to pop up and may convince someone to steer clear of an ecoboost truck.
[quote]

I know of VERY few that have 4x4s and or 3.55 or 3.73 that can get the advertised numbers. I don't know what posts you have been reading but 99% with the configuration I mention above get 17-18 @ 70. A far cry from the EPA rating.
 
  #49  
Old 12-06-2011, 07:18 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,196
Received 1,230 Likes on 808 Posts
[QUOTE=truckerdude;11122139][quote=tseekins;11098358]But the thing is gentlemen, most of here are getting the advertised numbers out of our EB trucks running 70+ when possible. There are some exceptions like in Ed's case where the truck just doesn't seem to want to cooperate.

The only thing that bugs me is that this thread will become poor advertising for Ford. Someone will Google Ecoboost MPG and this thread is likely to pop up and may convince someone to steer clear of an ecoboost truck.

I know of VERY few that have 4x4s and or 3.55 or 3.73 that can get the advertised numbers. I don't know what posts you have been reading but 99% with the configuration I mention above get 17-18 @ 70. A far cry from the EPA rating.
That's actually within the EPA standards. I just looked at my factory sticker.

The two large numbers say: 15 city ------ 21 highway

Below these two large numbers it clearly says: 12-18 city------17-25 highway.

People are getting all bunged up over the lower portion of the EPA rating but it's still within the advertised standard.

Ed didn't achieve the higher MPG's with his truck but his MPG's for the most part were still within spec.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ottawaguy
Escape & Escape Hybrid
14
02-18-2011 07:52 PM
Old Medic
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
12-03-2010 12:59 PM
vrsc
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
1
12-23-2005 03:31 PM
adam42481
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
3
04-12-2005 06:01 PM
Third Coast
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
10-19-2004 01:15 PM



Quick Reply: Here we go.....again



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.