When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Gen IV 5300 have it, and I know the Caddy 6200 has it. Chrysler Hemi at some point got it they call it "Multi Displacement System". For the V-8 it shuts off 4 cylinders. Gm had a 3.9 V-6 that shut off 2. I make my living working on caddies and having the old timers tell me what a POS the V8-6-4 was back in 1981. One guys been there since 78.
when the old 4-6-8 system worked, it worked great.
and when it failed, it failed greatly too, disabling the injection system and leaving you dead on the side of the road.
And what, really, would you gain. Shutting off 1/2 the cylinders would just mean that the other half would have to do twice as much work, and they'd use twice as much fuel (per cylinder) doing it. You'd still have all the friction of engine components to overcome.
Doesn't seem to me like you gain much for the complexity.
it actually increased fuel mileage by a large amount because when at cruising speed where little power was needed to maintain speed 4 cylinders were "turned off".
the fuel was shut off and the valves were opened making them dead holes.
It's be interesting to see some real life numbers. It takes the same amount of energy to move the vehicle, whether it has a 4 or an 8 cylinder. And you still have all the rotating mass and friction. The only theoretical savings would be in the compression not being done in the 4 dead cylinders, but I don't see that saving much either.
I understand that the 4 dead cylinders don't have fuel going to them. I also understand that the 4 live cylinders have to have nearly twice as much fuel going to them in order to generate an equal amount of power.
In order to produce a certain amount of power, it's either 8 cylinders with X amount of fuel, or 4 cylinders with 2 times X amount of fuel, all other conditions being equal.
negative. the 4 cylinders get the same amount of fuel as if it was still running on 8. if there is a demand for more power, the computer will kick in either 2 or 4 more cylinders.
That's not possible. If you cut the fuel supply in half, you cut the power produced roughly in half.
Like I said, for any given amount of output power, you're going to use 1x amount of fuel each in 8 cylinders, or 2x amount of fuel each in 4 cylinders. Unless you're going to increase the thermal efficiency of the engine by a factor of 2, or violate the laws of physics.
negative. the 4 cylinders get the same amount of fuel as if it was still running on 8. if there is a demand for more power, the computer will kick in either 2 or 4 more cylinders.
So let's say the vehicle takes 16 horsepower to keep it moving at a certain speed down the road. You have 8 cylinders running, each producing 2 horsepower. Now you turn off four of them, and you only have 8 horsepower. Will the truck maintain speed at 8 horsepower when 16 are required? No, it won't. The remaining cylinders have to double their production, and that takes more fuel.
What engine are we talking about here the POS V8-6-4 or whats used now cause the unused cylinders are not wide open valves they remain shut after a power stroke the exhaust gas stays in the unused cylinder and acts like a spring. read up
like i said, i don't know how it works, just that it does.
the old 4-6-8 caddy system when working properly would increase fuel mileage on the highway by 5-6 mpg. and that was pretty impressive on a car that would only get 12-13 mpg when running on all 8.
unfortunately, the 4-6-8 system sucked, and broke more than it worked.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.