Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

ECOBOOST OR 5L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 08:35 AM
  #1  
Big-Red-Lariat's Avatar
Big-Red-Lariat
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 4
From: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
ECOBOOST OR 5L

has anyone blown up an Ecoboost yet or had any major problems?

They ran out of them at my dealer so I tool the 5L, and am wondering in retrospect if it was a wise choice, if I missed out on something good or if I made a wise decision???
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 04:13 PM
  #2  
Powerdude's Avatar
Powerdude
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 1
Normally aspirated engines are more economical in terms of repairs, and therefore last a lot longer.

I think you made a wise choice. You will not regret it over the long haul.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 04:44 PM
  #3  
D8chumley's Avatar
D8chumley
Resident smarta$$
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 9
From: Oaks,PA
Club FTE Gold Member
I'm curious how many EB trucks have been sold in just the first MY alone. Seems to be a pretty popular choice. I have really only heard of a few that had some issues.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 04:53 PM
  #4  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,024
Likes: 1,519
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Powerdude
Normally aspirated engines are more economical in terms of repairs, and therefore last a lot longer.

I think you made a wise choice. You will not regret it over the long haul.
Making a repair reduces it's life expectancy? I'd love to read this one.

I think the 5.0 or the 3.5 were great choices either way. The eco is popular for obvious reasons but the pony is a great V-8 and I would be proud to own one. In fact, I had spec'd several trucks specifically for the 5.0 but the eco truck fell in my lap and I couldn't be happier.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
If you plan to keep the truck beyond the factory warranty period a naturally aspirated motor makes more sense, but if not by all means get the fancy toy.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 05:25 PM
  #6  
D8chumley's Avatar
D8chumley
Resident smarta$$
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 9
From: Oaks,PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Conanski
If you plan to keep the truck beyond the factory warranty period a naturally aspirated motor makes more sense, but if not by all means get the fancy toy.
I traded my 04 6.0 diesel with 146k on this one, original turbo.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by D8chumley
I traded my 04 6.0 diesel with 146k on this one, original turbo.
Which is just broken in for a diesel, what's your point? My '90 is now a 21 year old truck with 400kms(250k mi) on it and a lot of original parts still in fine working order, while my dad has an '05 that needs a new rear axle at 50kms(30k mi). They don't build em like they used to.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
akalogan's Avatar
akalogan
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Conanski
Which is just broken in for a diesel, what's your point? My '90 is now a 21 year old truck with 400kms(250k mi) on it and a lot of original parts still in fine working order, while my dad has an '05 that needs a new rear axle at 50kms(30k mi). They don't build em like they used to.
His point is that the turbo was working just fine. I do get tired of people saying how the 5.0 is going to be more reliable the eco boost. Can you folks see into the future? I think that either engine is a great choice. Besides there is just as many moving parts/technology in the 5.0 (if not more) then the eco... Get over your short sighted thought process.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 06:18 PM
  #9  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,024
Likes: 1,519
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Conanski
Which is just broken in for a diesel, what's your point? My '90 is now a 21 year old truck with 400kms(250k mi) on it and a lot of original parts still in fine working order, while my dad has an '05 that needs a new rear axle at 50kms(30k mi). They don't build em like they used to.
And my '88 was a POS. Engine replaced at 105K miles, rear axle crapped out at 225K. The syncro's in the transmission were shot and she had rust creeping all over the place.

I agree with you sir. Thank God they don't make them like they used to.

IMO, a turbo is a turbo. It's a spinning vein that moves tons of air. It works on diesel trucks just fine, why not the 3.5L gas?

I'm actually more concerned about the new six speed in any of the F150's more than I am about a single component on the ecoboost.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 06:19 PM
  #10  
D8chumley's Avatar
D8chumley
Resident smarta$$
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 9
From: Oaks,PA
Club FTE Gold Member
^^^ Yep, thats my point. I assumed your comparison was between " a naturally aspirated motor or a fancy toy" difference being the turbo(s). I took it that you were saying the turbos wouldn't hold up. Sorry if my assumption was incorrect
As a side note, the turbo was one of the things that DID hold up, lol. Thanks International...
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2011 | 07:04 PM
  #11  
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 7
I went with the 5.0L because I just like V8's more. It makes more than enough power to satisty my wants/needs and sounds 100x better IMO and gets about the same mileage as the Ecoboost.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #12  
ddrumman2004's Avatar
ddrumman2004
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: N. Mississippi
If you enjoy the sound of a V8...then you made a good decision. On the other hand, my Ecoboost sounds just fine under acceleration and the power is just.......just....incredible.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 02:03 PM
  #13  
Big Bad's Avatar
Big Bad
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
I'm still waiting for someone to vid a drag race between the 5.0 and EB. From the unloaded numbers I've seen they run pretty much identical times, which makes the 6.2 seem pointless.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 04:12 PM
  #14  
Marc Kessler's Avatar
Marc Kessler
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Don't forget that you can't get a 36 gallon tank with the EB. We ordered the EB at the beginning of the year but having to wait and the size of the gas tank issue we went with the 5.0. Good thing we did. Driving through Alabama after the tornadoes we couldn't get gas for over 300 miles.
 
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2011 | 04:47 PM
  #15  
Deluxe05's Avatar
Deluxe05
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 4
From: Denver, Co
Club FTE Silver Member

FYI: The EcoBoost-equipped 2012 F-150s all come standard with the 36-gallon fuel tank.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE