Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

GT40'd 5.8....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 06:02 PM
  #16  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by 94MustangGT
4) I'm not against using GT40X's, TFS or Dart's but I don't want to turn around and limit it too bad using the stock intake manifold, EFI compontents, etc....
Without the intake the engine won't be as strong as it could be but so what, it'll still be quite a bit stroinger than stock and this gives you something else to upgrade in the future.
All the aftermarket intakes flow better than the stock piece and most of them are single TB car style so you need that piece and an EGR spacer if you want to keep that functional. And then you need larger injectors and MAF meter and a tune to make it all cooperate, so this one change can be quite expensive all on it's own.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #17  
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 3
From: Conway, South Carolina
The two Biggest things is the intake and heads.

1. Edelbrock 5.8 truck intake
2. Ford Racing GT-40 turbo swirl Aluminum heads

This is what I'd do. You are probably looking at 350 hp just from these two things.

I got a buddie, he put a 4bbl aftermarket intake on, and gt-40 iron heads and had it put on the dino, it made 320 hp, 295 torque.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 09:07 PM
  #18  
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,330
Likes: 292
From: Laramie, WY
295 ft. lbs? With a 5.8? Isn't that a step backwards from stock torque numbers?
I may have read torque numbers at the crank, and your buddies 295 is at the wheels?
I thought they made 330 ft. lbs. stock, but just 230hsp.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 09:19 PM
  #19  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Yeah I'll lay $$ those dyno numbers are at the wheels which means you can add 25% for drivetrain losses to get 400hp and 370tq at the crank!
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 09:41 PM
  #20  
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 3
From: Conway, South Carolina
Originally Posted by GoinBoarding
295 ft. lbs? With a 5.8? Isn't that a step backwards from stock torque numbers?
I may have read torque numbers at the crank, and your buddies 295 is at the wheels?
I thought they made 330 ft. lbs. stock, but just 230hsp.
I dont really remember the torque, I might be wrong, but I am 100% sure of the 320 hp. And yes, it was at rear wheel power.

351W:
1. 210hp and 315 torque (with like E7 heads)
2. 240 hp and 325 torque (with gt-40 heads, lighting intake)
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 11:07 PM
  #21  
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 71
From: Calhoun GA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by SCRebel
...I got a buddie, he put a 4bbl aftermarket intake on, and gt-40 iron heads and had it put on the dino, it made 320 hp, 295 torque.
WOW, I've seen quite a few dyno runs with aftermarket intakes and GT-40's, but never that much, even on Dynojet. I can't help but think that there might be a little more to that combo than simply GT-40's and an aftermarket intake on an otherwise stock motor. If not, then he's got it dialed in nicely!
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 11:44 PM
  #22  
94MustangGT's Avatar
94MustangGT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: NC
All interesting points gentlemen.

Again, I looking to keep things as simple as possible and not have this turn into a big dollar project. I'm not really interested in "big" numbers just a well matched combo that will keep things as close to stock as possible(stock= less $ spent, afterall I need to save some for a 302 build for the GT haha) 275 BHP and 375 TQ are rough parameters...
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2011 | 11:52 PM
  #23  
94MustangGT's Avatar
94MustangGT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Conanski
Without the intake the engine won't be as strong as it could be but so what, it'll still be quite a bit stroinger than stock and this gives you something else to upgrade in the future.
All the aftermarket intakes flow better than the stock piece and most of them are single TB car style so you need that piece and an EGR spacer if you want to keep that functional. And then you need larger injectors and MAF meter and a tune to make it all cooperate, so this one change can be quite expensive all on it's own.
Good point. I've been in touch with a local guy with some Explorer GT40's for sale..100K on the heads and one broken exhaust manifold bolt. Still do not know th asking price. Depending on the intial price and how much a machine shop will charge to rebuild them, new heads may be the practical choice..

Would "port matching" the intake be needed? Mild port work on some GT40's may be doable, I just need to contact some machine shops and get some quotes.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 06:20 AM
  #24  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
I'm interested in doing a similar build on a 5.8 to replace my 5.0. I will be going for an emissions friendly setup also. I figured we would all be discussing the same thing, so now need to start a new thread.

I would like to either use the Bassani Y or the Bassani dual setup for a Lightning. I just really want true duals.

I have not decided on what shortys to get yet. I know that the BBK don't fit well and the Hedmans are known for defects in the welds.

I too prefer to go with cast iron GT40 heads. I know to stay away from P heads. Is this the only cast iron head option there is?
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 10:45 AM
  #25  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by 94MustangGT
Would "port matching" the intake be needed?
Needed... no, but worth pricing yes.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #26  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by TexasGuy001
I too prefer to go with cast iron GT40 heads. I know to stay away from P heads. Is this the only cast iron head option there is?
From Ford yes, but from the aftermarket you have cast iron heads from World Products, Dart, and RHS that can be purchased brand new, fully assembled, and ready to bolt on for about $1200 a pair.
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 01:51 PM
  #27  
94MustangGT's Avatar
94MustangGT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by TexasGuy001
I'm interested in doing a similar build on a 5.8 to replace my 5.0. I will be going for an emissions friendly setup also. I figured we would all be discussing the same thing, so now need to start a new thread.

I would like to either use the Bassani Y or the Bassani dual setup for a Lightning. I just really want true duals.

I have not decided on what shortys to get yet. I know that the BBK don't fit well and the Hedmans are known for defects in the welds.

I too prefer to go with cast iron GT40 heads. I know to stay away from P heads. Is this the only cast iron head option there is?
On the headers, I may go with FRPP pieces... Pricey, but they seem to be well made. Then modify the Bassani Y to work with the 3 O2 senors.

Conaski, the guy is asking $275... Not bad, but I'll see if he will take $200 which should allow me to have a machine shop rebuild them and still have them cost considerably less than a new set...

As far as a cam goes... what are some good options? Power bad = idle to 4500-5000 PRM's. Is this the one mentioned earlier?
http://www.compperformancegroupstore...ode=F50CEFIMAG

This one is even smalller: http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...csid=1446&sb=2
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 10:23 AM
  #28  
SCRebel's Avatar
SCRebel
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 3
From: Conway, South Carolina
Originally Posted by Blurry94
WOW, I've seen quite a few dyno runs with aftermarket intakes and GT-40's, but never that much, even on Dynojet. I can't help but think that there might be a little more to that combo than simply GT-40's and an aftermarket intake on an otherwise stock motor. If not, then he's got it dialed in nicely!
He has a 95 lightning f150. It is stock except for roller rockers,(unless he's keeping secrets lol) and he even put the lightning intake back on, He was just curious to see how much the truck would make with a 4bbl intake. He also works at a motor shop, so he knows how to tune a engine perfectly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #29  
nstueve's Avatar
nstueve
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 7
From: Des Moines, Iowa
The question is what are you capable of doing yourself????

Personally for the numbers you are looking at wanting....

I'd go with long tubes and put them on with studs so changing heads later will be easier... Also go with the cam that Conanski (paul) suggested and you'll be at your power goals for less than $500 if you can turn the wrenches yourself!

Head's and intake can be done later when you have $1000-$1500 to drop for more power...
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2011 | 04:35 PM
  #30  
94MustangGT's Avatar
94MustangGT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: NC
^ I'll have a quote by tomorrow (rebuild heads, install cam and heads + exhaust work)

I may even forego short tubes and reuse the stock manifolds. Again, with the factory tune, the motor will not spin faster than 4500 RPM's so short tubes may not be worth it. Any thoughts on that?

Anyone have a link to the stock, roller truck cam specs?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE