Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

351w Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 08:02 PM
  #31  
first today's Avatar
first today
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 2
From: Prairieville, La
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by NW 150
don't even dare put down the 390, mine will do anything your 351"w" can do and better
I agree whole heartedly. The FE 390 has to be my favorite most fun engine. I wish I had another one. I seem to remember that it had the most stock horsepower over all the other ford motors. 2barrel for 2 barrel. I also can not remember if the chart had the 460 though.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 08:14 PM
  #32  
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by ChaseTruck754
Obviously I was exaggerating a bit, but it kind of shot your "anything better" statement out the window...

I've got buddies that like the FE, heck a buddy had Clay Smith build this for his '73



BUT I'm a windsor believer and disagree with your statement.
I also meant to go back and change my statement so it wasn't as "harsh", but i was too busy watchin the indians game. I'm an FE believer and I disagree with you lol. What engine was it that one a bunch of nascar and lemans trophies back when people didn't give an F about emissions and just wanted power?

I'll settle with the fact that at least you're a ford believer, or at least it makes sense that you would be if you're on here.

And that engine looks kick ***.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 08:16 PM
  #33  
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by first today
I agree whole heartedly. The FE 390 has to be my favorite most fun engine. I wish I had another one. I seem to remember that it had the most stock horsepower over all the other ford motors. 2barrel for 2 barrel. I also can not remember if the chart had the 460 though.
Thanks! Yea i have no idea about the hp, I know mine was the lowest rated one though at 201hp. Not a bad start though and can be raised pretty easily by changing the intake carb and adding headers like I have.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 08:28 PM
  #34  
ChaseTruck754's Avatar
ChaseTruck754
Lead Driver
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 15
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Originally Posted by NW 150
Thanks! Yea i have no idea about the hp, I know mine was the lowest rated one though at 201hp. Not a bad start though and can be raised pretty easily by changing the intake carb and adding headers like I have.

Yeah my buddies 390 kicks butt.
Yes also I'm mainly a Ford guy and I'm open to owning and using parts off the "other" brands though. I don't dig the blind, brand loyalty BS many here abide by.
And 201 HP - aren't the 80's 351w's rated at more than that? Bolt on some heads and you are way above that.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #35  
firebogger's Avatar
firebogger
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
390=195hp. No thanks. Mine has an edelbrock intake, 4bbl carb and longtubes. All tuned up and............its not up to par for my liking. I'm sure I could rebuild it with better parts, but I just don't see that in the cards. I've had great luck with Windsors, but am leaning towards a 460 right now due to ease of use (bellhousing, motor mounts, headers) and the cheap cost to make some power. Seems the hp/$ is best with the 3.85s. Thanks to all for their input!
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #36  
HIO Silver's Avatar
HIO Silver
Fleet Owner
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,678
Likes: 82
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by firebogger
390=195hp. No thanks. Mine has an edelbrock intake, 4bbl carb and longtubes. All tuned up and............its not up to par for my liking. I'm sure I could rebuild it with better parts, but I just don't see that in the cards.
Whoa. Waitaminute you guys... Yall gotta keep in mind when quoting HP figures is that the industry in the early 70s changed how it was measured.

Before it was gross HP, now it is net HP... net is with accessory drives and other parasitic losses. Therefore, citing HP figures from the 60s isn't the same as citing HP figures in the 70s. The 195 HP figure is net... add another 20 percent to 30 percent as a thumbnail guide for comparison.

$0.05.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #37  
first today's Avatar
first today
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,593
Likes: 2
From: Prairieville, La
Club FTE Silver Member

The poster I had came out of car and driver "100 years of the automobile" if I remember right. It was sometime in the mid eighties. They were stock engines compared to stock engines. I remember the 351m/400 had less horsepower than the 302. I wish I still had the poster.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 11:17 PM
  #38  
Aaron-71's Avatar
Aaron-71
Logistics Pro
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 19
From: Regina, Saskatchewan
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by ChaseTruck754

BUT I'm a windsor believer and disagree with your statement.
Thank god... Windsor is the way to go. When we're 50 years down the road, which engine will be talked about? The windsor... not the 390...

Originally Posted by NW 150
What engine was it that one a bunch of nascar and lemans trophies back when people didn't give an F about emissions and just wanted power?
What engine is it that can be built to hold more HP than the 390 could ever dream of? The Windsor... Google it... a pre 74 Windsor engine can hold over 2000 horses. What can your 390 hold? Not nearly that much my friend. No offense, but that beats the hell out of your arguement.

I'll gladly be convinced differently though.

Originally Posted by ChaseTruck754
Yeah my buddies 390 kicks butt.
Yes also I'm mainly a Ford guy and I'm open to owning and using parts off the "other" brands though. I don't dig the blind, brand loyalty BS many here abide by.

Neither do i... I'm not a fan of the whole "brand loyalty" either.

And 201 HP - aren't the 80's 351w's rated at more than that? Bolt on some heads and you are way above that.
Lol, yeap! they sure are!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 12:16 AM
  #39  
Thunderjet4x4's Avatar
Thunderjet4x4
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Try some 80-94ish headers-351W/5.8L for a F250 4x4, might work! Or be close. I've made a 69 429 fit with late 70 2wd chassis headers into an 88 F150, not pretty and the 429 killed the truck, but it worked.
Fab and welding FTW.
The FE engines are good, just can't find the good parts anymore. I had a 74 F100 360 2V 4spd 4X4, and a 76 F250 Highboy, 390(yes, and it wasn't stock) 4V 4spd 4x4.
The F100 360 would slip the clutch, the F250 390 would lay rubber. Tough motors, nearly indestructible!
The 351W has incredible potential! Small and light, all kinds of parts available, no real weak points, except parts that can be changed.
Strokers galore for options!
I would like to build a simple 393Clevor, stock 351 block, aftermarket crank, stock rods, stock 302/5.0 pistons, and some high compression 351Cleveland heads.
Of course, more stroke is available, which equals torque(or a 408, or a sweet 427)
One Day!
Restore, use what you have, its a Ford!
Make it work, and enjoy it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 05:06 AM
  #40  
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Aaron-71
What engine is it that can be built to hold more HP than the 390 could ever dream of? The Windsor... Google it... a pre 74 Windsor engine can hold over 2000 horses. What can your 390 hold? Not nearly that much my friend. No offense, but that beats the hell out of your arguement.
The 390 is just one FE, so it doesn't mean it's the only one you can compare with others.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 05:06 AM
  #41  
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by firebogger
390=195hp. No thanks. Mine has an edelbrock intake, 4bbl carb and longtubes. All tuned up and............its not up to par for my liking. I'm sure I could rebuild it with better parts, but I just don't see that in the cards. I've had great luck with Windsors, but am leaning towards a 460 right now due to ease of use (bellhousing, motor mounts, headers) and the cheap cost to make some power. Seems the hp/$ is best with the 3.85s. Thanks to all for their input!
the 460 was also rated in the upper 190s i believe it one time, either that or just over 200
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #42  
Aaron-71's Avatar
Aaron-71
Logistics Pro
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 19
From: Regina, Saskatchewan
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Thunderjet4x4
Try some 80-94ish headers-351W/5.8L for a F250 4x4, might work!
Hmm.. really? I've never come across something like that before on any threads I've searched up, but hey.. it's worth a shot if it'll give me some headers!

And I'm planning on building a 408 stroker or "Torque Monster" as I call it. All for the purposes of towing. It might be overkill, but whatever, i'll have fun building it!
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 01:34 PM
  #43  
ChaseTruck754's Avatar
ChaseTruck754
Lead Driver
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 15
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Originally Posted by Thunderjet4x4
I would like to build a simple 393Clevor, stock 351 block, aftermarket crank, stock rods, stock 302/5.0 pistons, and some high compression 351Cleveland heads.
Sounds like what I will build for my '74 supercab. I've got trick flow aluminum heads though...
I'm starting with a roller block 351w and will stroke to 393. I could go bigger but why??? I want the thing to have low compression. Yup - you read that right. I need it to run on Pemex (mexican gas) when I'm down there so will keep at 9.5:1 max.
It'll be EFI with a stand alone computer. I've got an SDS one right now but may go to megasquirt. I've got boxes full of bolt ons for it already including a BBK throttle body, eldelbrock intake manifold, etc.

Should compare to my buddies 390 that's for sure. They're guessing that 390 is about 500 hp.

Oh - and here's the truck it's going in!


More pics here
GoFastBroncos.com - View topic - The F-Bomb
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #44  
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by ChaseTruck754
Should compare to my buddies 390 that's for sure. They're guessing that 390 is about 500 hp.
Yea that's a pretty good number for that engine. Some people seem to think it is a high revving high horsepower engine, when in reality it's more of a work/ not very high revving motor, but it's got some of the most torque in stock configuration. Don't get me wrong though about being able to wind it up, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqDO1rRJXNs
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lvin4jc
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Sep 22, 2017 09:52 PM
Supermike#1
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Apr 1, 2016 08:27 PM
Weberman3
Exhaust Systems
7
Jun 9, 2011 10:18 AM
galaxie521
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
May 1, 2010 06:09 AM
ehanani
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jun 10, 2006 10:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE