'00 vs '06 fuel pump assembly
I have a 2000 Ranger with a 2006 engine, been having issues with the fuel pump, replaced the pump/strainer and fuel filter wtih 2000 parts, no luck, at all. We took it to a mechanic and they told us it needs a 2006 pump.
So for those of you familiar with these parts... can the 2006 fuel pump assembly be integrated with the 2000 fuel lines & electrical wiring?
Thanks!
That said, an injector doesn't know beans about pressure, and will flow what it will flow. If you were able to put the 2000 injectors into the 2006 ports and fuel rail, they should work just fine with the same vintage pump and regulator.
Check the pressure specifications for each engine, and if they differ, try swapping the old injectors into the new engine. You should not need to change the pump & sender.
tom
I'm really not mechanically inclined at all, so that answer helps me a ton! I would've never thought about looking into if the injectors are interchangeable, that gives me a lot to go off of, and really helps. Thanks tom!
Emily
p.s. any other input still will be greatly appreciated!!
I have a 2000 Ranger with a 2006 engine, been having issues with the fuel pump, replaced the pump/strainer and fuel filter wtih 2000 parts, no luck, at all. We took it to a mechanic and they told us it needs a 2006 pump.
So for those of you familiar with these parts... can the 2006 fuel pump assembly be integrated with the 2000 fuel lines & electrical wiring?
Thanks!
98 is when they increased the pressure and went to a return less system....
4.0L v6 supercab ranger, 126" wheelbase, 4x4, automatic tranny.
The '06 engine was installed in April of 2008, it ran OK for a year, then started idling rough, we replaced spark plugs & wires and that seemed to help, but and still has pretty much been doing that since 2009, with this past 6mo it really started going downhill, it's been "kicking" at speeds above 65mph.
Also, been having issues with the Check Engine light. Was throwing codes P0171 and P0174 along with the P0153 (I think--O2 sensor code), replaced Mass Airflow Sensor and that got rid of the first two, but the O2 sensor code was still there, hubby got the bright idea of replacing the fuel pump (as we've already replaced all the O2 sensors), did so and the O2 sensor code went away (yay!) but the 171 and 174 fuel lean codes came back.... it ran GREAT after we replaced the pump with a new 2000 pump for 48 hours, then became worse than before, not wanting to start right away. I wonder if maybe we should've replaced the entire fuel pump assembly, vs. just the pump and strainer.
4.0L v6 supercab ranger, 126" wheelbase, 4x4, automatic tranny.
The '06 engine was installed in April of 2008, it ran OK for a year, then started idling rough, we replaced spark plugs & wires and that seemed to help, but and still has pretty much been doing that since 2009, with this past 6mo it really started going downhill, it's been "kicking" at speeds above 65mph.
Also, been having issues with the Check Engine light. Was throwing codes P0171 and P0174 along with the P0153 (I think--O2 sensor code), replaced Mass Airflow Sensor and that got rid of the first two, but the O2 sensor code was still there, hubby got the bright idea of replacing the fuel pump (as we've already replaced all the O2 sensors), did so and the O2 sensor code went away (yay!) but the 171 and 174 fuel lean codes came back.... it ran GREAT after we replaced the pump with a new 2000 pump for 48 hours, then became worse than before, not wanting to start right away. I wonder if maybe we should've replaced the entire fuel pump assembly, vs. just the pump and strainer.
p0153 is usually a bad o2 sensor, bank 2 sensor 1.......it might be worth a shot to swap that out!
*(NEVER MIND i SEE THAT YOU REPLACED ALL THE O2 SENSORS)
you need to do a fuel pressure test, koeo, koer, etc.......maybe it is the regulator?
did you check that the new pump was the same pump that came out of the tank?
Last edited by powersmoked; Aug 2, 2011 at 10:28 AM. Reason: *
Trending Topics

Other useful info can be found here,,, https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...w-members.html
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Other useful info can be found here,,, https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...w-members.html
....You are penalizing people that want to do the right thing because some do the wrong thing.........Here is the solution.......make new members complete a detailed profile of their truck before they join.........if they don't complete it then don't let them join.......that way you keep out the trolls........ I think the reason they don't do this is they actually want as many members on the forums, even if they are useless non contributing trolls.........the site "looks" better with a higher number of members
p0153 is usually a bad o2 sensor, bank 2 sensor 1.......it might be worth a shot to swap that out!
*(NEVER MIND i SEE THAT YOU REPLACED ALL THE O2 SENSORS)
you need to do a fuel pressure test, koeo, koer, etc.......maybe it is the regulator?
did you check that the new pump was the same pump that came out of the tank?
Yep, we did double check to make sure the pumps were the same. At first we thought maybe we just hadn't screwed down that white O-ring cap well enough, double checked it, but no luck. I wonder too if it's not the regulator cuz I double checked with my husband and he said he never specifically told the mechanic we had only replaced the pump, not the entire assembly. Hmm
And in regards to the 25 posts, not a problem! I've been on other boards that are like that
Until 2000 in the Ranger is was an OHV engine, which I'm assuming has a fuel return line to the fuel pump. It requires a fuel pressure PSI of 39-40, with a 30psi idle.
After 2001 the Ranger carried a SOHC engine, which then has the PSI of 64-75. No fuel return line...
I verified this with my Ranger via VIN (OHV have an X code, SOHC has an E... my VIN does not have an E, but does have an X), so that means this vehicle is set up for the lower PSI, but the engine in it is not getting what it needs.
Uuuurrrrggghh!! This vehicle is such a pain in the butt...
I really don't know why that mechanic didn't just rebuild the engine vs putting in an entire new one, he should've researched this. I'm really tempted to call the guy who put it in, even though it's been 3 years, and give him a piece of my mind. *sigh*Suggestions? Do you think we can do away with the fuel return line and still put the 2006 pump in?




