Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Increasing Horse Power Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 03:38 PM
  #1  
Trojan8975's Avatar
Trojan8975
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Increasing Horse Power Question

I have a stock 1992 Ford F150 Nite thats needs some mild upgrades to increase its torque, mpg, and/or horsepower. What upgrades do you recommend? It is a 4x4 with 5.0 302 and a 5-speed.
 
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 04:12 PM
  #2  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
That motor needs a cam badly and no other change will have as much effect on engine power. It's not that expensive to do a cam swap but it is quite a bit of work, figure on about $300 for the cam and another $50 or so for a gasket set and a whole day to do it.
Depending what cam you pick and how your truck is currently setup a gearing change is the next best upgrade, you want 4.10's for tires up to about 31" and 4.56 or higher the bigger you go from there.
 
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #3  
ostrx250's Avatar
ostrx250
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
if you do a cam you need to grind the exhaust ports out two match the gasket at the very least the best bang for the buck is a new set of heads the cheapest jump is a new cam but is also necessary. tell us what you do and your results
 
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2011 | 11:26 PM
  #4  
chris11376's Avatar
chris11376
New User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
take your heads to a good machine shop and have them built most decent head shops can tell you what would be the best for youe engine, and its usually cheaper to get your old heads built than to buy a new set of built heads. If there is a Dover cylinder head near you they do great work
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 12:20 PM
  #5  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by ostrx250
if you do a cam you need to grind the exhaust ports out two match the gasket at the very least
Originally Posted by ostrx250
the best bang for the buck is a new set of heads
I have to disagree with these two statements. I have put cams in several of these truck motors and without any other changes the gains are substantial. That's not to say that changing or modifying the heads won't produce gains too, it will... but it's not "required".
And with a flat tappet motor a cam change is easily the best bang for the buck, you can have a cam and lifter set and the necessary gaskets to change it for $200-$250, while rebuilt heads are gonna cost $500 alone.
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 12:25 PM
  #6  
bladez51's Avatar
bladez51
Senior User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
I agree with ostrx250 based on my observations.

I'm no expert on the 5.0 for trucks, but my friend had a '93 Mustang GT and the single improvement that gave him the greatest gains was porting and polishing the heads... Now, I'm sure that the cam in the truck engines is made for longevity and greatest torque at certain rpm. I imagine that changing the cam would make a noticeable difference and probably works great in conjunction with good heads.

Everything else he did (which was a lot, including the cam) did very little difference in power. All this was checked on the dyno.
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #7  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by bladez51
Now, I'm sure that the cam in the truck engines is made for greatest torque at certain rpm.
Yeah that's key, the truck cams are designed that way and as a result are very restrictive compared to even the stock HO cam.. and particularly with the early EFI motors. In fact the HO cam is a great way to unleash quite a bit of HP on the cheap with these truck motors.
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #8  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,786
Likes: 1,751
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by Conanski
Yeah that's key, the truck cams are designed that way and as a result are very restrictive compared to even the stock HO cam.. and particularly with the early EFI motors. In fact the HO cam is a great way to unleash quite a bit of HP on the cheap with these truck motors.
I am siding with Paul on this one. A better cam is a very good first step on these truck engines. Porting of any type is "not required" to benefit from the upgraded cam.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #9  
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Depending on your budget and timeline, this is the beginning of a long journey. If your not in a hurry there are always good deals to be had.

I went to Carlisle and picked up an Explorer intake for $50. H.O. cams can be had nothing. A switch to Mass air?

But depending on your mechanical skills, you can do them all yourself in progression. The big 4 are exhaust, intake, heads and cam. Most people develop their mechanical ability and confidence by progressing in that order of improvements.

Have fun.
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 06:22 PM
  #10  
lew52's Avatar
lew52
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 2
The 92 5.0 has a small cam , so yeah a cam will help a bunch , the mustangs use the same heads as the truck but use the HO cam , so they make more HP , the 5.0 intake is fine , long tube headers will help and are a must if you upgrade the heads , and should be one of the first upgrades , exhaust , cam , heads and gearing will all help.....Lew
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 03:57 PM
  #11  
deljac's Avatar
deljac
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Lincoln, Ne
conansky. you sound like you have done these cam swaps. i have a 95 4x4 with the 302 what cam have you found is the best hp increase
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 04:58 PM
  #12  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by deljac
i have a 95 4x4 with the 302 what cam have you found is the best hp increase
If your truck is MAF the Ford E303 is hard to beat in terms of peak HP but.. it'll be a complete dog below 3000rpm so you will also need steep gears(4.10-4.56) in the rear axle.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2011 | 10:06 PM
  #13  
deljac's Avatar
deljac
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Lincoln, Ne
what is MAF and i run 32" tires and am planning on 4.56 gears
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2011 | 04:05 AM
  #14  
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
FTE Chapter Leader
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8,843
Likes: 27
From: Eastern Ky
Club FTE Silver Member

MAF=Mass Air Flow
SD=Speed Density
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #15  
bladez51's Avatar
bladez51
Senior User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 205
Likes: 1
quick question

My truck is a '94 XLT with the 5.0 engine. How can I tell if I have the MAF or SD set ups?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE