Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Exhausting search...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 11:42 PM
  #1  
donnor's Avatar
donnor
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 5
From: Missouri - Lake of the Oz
Exhausting search...

I am turning to some of you CA FTE'ers for some answers. Our son has accepted a position with a company that will necessitate a move to the San Diego area. He is planning to take his 92 Bronco. Can anyone tell me what will be required for it to be emissions legal for CA? I understand that testing & requirements vary even by ZIP code. From what we can ascertain he will not be required to undergo a "sniff" test (NOX levels?). It does have an aftermarket [universal] cat, muffler, and tailpipe; all having been changed due to rust/corrosion failure. If it needs to have a new headpipe & cat assembly I have found a Walker unit that leads me to think it would be CA smog legal. However, the description also carries some text: "Direct Fit; Front & Rear; Replaces Both Front and Rear Converters; Fed. & Calif. Emiss. Models.; Replaces Multiple O.E. Converters. Only Failed Converters May Be Replaced. Not Legal For Sale on Vehicles Licensed in the State of California".

Thank you for any input those of you in the know can provide.

dn.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 03:20 AM
  #2  
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,182
Likes: 12
From: Gateway to the West
Club FTE Gold Member
Unless there is something missing from the OEM emissions and Thermactor system, the truck should be fine. Not even the obnoxious state of California can mandate that you rebuild a vehicle that was not originally built for sale in the state of CA just to fit their ridiculous emissions testing. If that was the case, they would have to stop every vehicle that crossed their border and make the owner add any crap they deemed necessary to the emissions system for any car traveling into the state. (Now that I think about it, CA might actually try to be that obnoxious about it if they thought they could.)

Now if the truck stays in CA and will end up being registered there, there may be some changes that CA will mandate. But there would be no need to worry about that until such time as the registration needed to be dealt with.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 07:41 AM
  #3  
donnor's Avatar
donnor
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 5
From: Missouri - Lake of the Oz
Clarification...

Yes, we are inquiring about what may be required for CA registration purposes. The job is most likely a long term situation. Referencing my initial post, I would assume the Walker y-pipe & cat should pass since it is billed as a direct replacement and the original parts are probably obsolete from Ford. Walker's text in the item description probably just carries the boilerplate verbiage required by their legal department. Any other perspectives - especially from CA FTEers who have had to deal with similar matters - would be most welcome.

dn.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #4  
b4hntn's Avatar
b4hntn
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 0
From: Longview, TX
Club FTE Silver Member

While in SD be sure to go to the the nice restaurant that gave Dean Martin the concept "Tea more Martunis, Please" they are delicious. Name of the place is Blue ....something.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2011 | 11:05 AM
  #5  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
Run what you brung. just have him tune it up prior to the snif test. also changing the oil prior helps. just make sure its driven at least 30mins so the motor is good and warmed up before getting the sniffer done.

also if the CEL isnt flashing he will be fine
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE