Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

ported gt40's, 351, and SD!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2011 | 05:04 PM
  #1  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
ported gt40's, 351, and SD!?

so im about to pull the trigger on a 351 donor setup, was just wonderin who's runnin gt40's on their SD 351? ive read some guys say dont do it, others say its a good mod. i will scavenge a MAF setup as i find it, but i hate doin work without handlin all the "misewells" like cam/head swap (while retaining the SD for now)

with that bein said, can i run ported gt40's and a SD friendly cam? how bout a mild compression bump also (via milling)? i know im askin a lot of the SD, but i would love to just do the head work now while the motors out, swap a mild cam, and be able to use the truck while as i piece the MAF setup together as i get the time/parts. that way i wont have to tear the heads off in the truck later on, rather just do a cam swap once i get the MAF setup.

is it possible: ported/milled gt40's and one of the SD friendly cams?

also, the 5.0 and 5.8 intake manifolds are not interchangeable? at what point does the 5.8 manifold become a restriction?
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
lew52's Avatar
lew52
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 2
The Gt 40s will work good , just don't get the gt 40p heads , different plug angle , something like the ford HO cam will work with SD , im not 100% sure but i think 9.5 -1 comp ratio should be ok.....but to run the HO cam the block needs to be roller ready....
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 05:31 PM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Head porting is fine so go to it. The Crane cam I always suggest for this motor (444232) is in use by several guys here on SD trucks and it cooperates just fine. The 5.8 intake would be the limiting factor on a stock motor if it wasn't for the 302 heads Ford installed on them, but you can squeeze a little more life out of it by porting the lower and in particular opening up the port exits where they meet the heads.. for some reason there is a serious narrowing there on all stock intakes.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 05:57 PM
  #4  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
dont all the ole ford efi blocks come roller ready (i.e. lifter galley is tapped for the "galley tree"). i noticed the funky manifolds they put on the gt40p's. i was gonna go that route and just do some cut-n-weldin (thinkin "how bad could it be") but after i saw what ford did to clear the plugs, the gains arent worth the means.

the better 5.0 intake wont fit the 5.8, correct? i was plannin on portin the **** outta either one, but if the 5.0 bolts up ill start with that one.

ill definately go with that crane cam 444232 until i go maf, for simplicity and $ sake.

thanks for the info. i feel pretty comfortable goin the 351 route now. it will save me a lotta money/headache in the long run goin 351 and keepin it blue oval. and i love the 351's stroker potential
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #5  
lew52's Avatar
lew52
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 2
Most of the 5.0 blocks from around 88 were roller ready , the 5.8 didn't get the roller cam till 94 , the 5.0 intake will not fit the 5.8....
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 06:19 PM
  #6  
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,008
Likes: 7
From: Austin, TX
What's wrong with GT40Ps??? Mine clear fine with normal ol' Ford Racing shorties.. Ok, I admit, they are mustang FRPP shorties.. Custom Y pipe needed. As Lew said, the 5.0 intake won't fit.. It's too small for the 5.8 block.

 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch
What's wrong with GT40Ps??? Mine clear fine with normal ol' Ford Racing shorties.. As Lew said, the 5.0 intake won't fit.. It's too small for the 5.8 block.

ya know this is what i thought until i saw the crazy shaped manifolds ford put on the explorers. . .ill have to study your pic you posted. . .

how close are your plug boots to the pipes? what plugs are you runnin?
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 06:50 PM
  #8  
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,008
Likes: 7
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by '89F2urd
ya know this is what i thought until i saw the crazy shaped manifolds ford put on the explorers. . .ill have to study your pic you posted. . .

how close are your plug boots to the pipes? what plugs are you runnin?
You just have to get the right headers to fit it. It has Motorcraft coppers in it. The spark plug boots have plenty of clearance, but I put THESE on there just in case they are a bit close. I can get a closer pic if you want.. Ported GT40 heads should run just about as good as these ported "P" heads will though.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:03 PM
  #9  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
searchin around, it looks like people are havin the most trouble with shorties, since the collector natrually forces the tubes to stay higher, longer. i think most long tube designs wouldnt even be a problem. . .

i was thinkin bout ported gt40's vs ported 40p's also. . .there isnt much gain with ported p's over reg ported 40's? the way i saw it, the smaller exhaust valve of the P's would allow the reg 40's to "catch up" a bit to the flow of the p's (after porting). of course, the "better" plug angle is what it is, but i would avoid problems altogether if the ported 40's flowed as good as ported p's.

its the same with ls1 vs ls6 heads. . .everyone thinks ls6 heads are superior (which they are in stock trim), but after porting both the ls1's actually outflow the ls6 to mid-lift. porting exposes strange differences sometimes.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2011 | 07:30 PM
  #10  
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,008
Likes: 7
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by '89F2urd
searchin around, it looks like people are havin the most trouble with shorties, since the collector natrually forces the tubes to stay higher, longer. i think most long tube designs wouldnt even be a problem. . .

i was thinkin bout ported gt40's vs ported 40p's also. . .there isnt much gain with ported p's over reg ported 40's? the way i saw it, the smaller exhaust valve of the P's would allow the reg 40's to "catch up" a bit to the flow of the p's (after porting). of course, the "better" plug angle is what it is, but i would avoid problems altogether if the ported 40's flowed as good as ported p's.

its the same with ls1 vs ls6 heads. . .everyone thinks ls6 heads are superior (which they are in stock trim), but after porting both the ls1's actually outflow the ls6 to mid-lift. porting exposes strange differences sometimes.
I'm not sure on the flow difference between the ported GT40 and the "P" heads, but I know mine flow pretty well.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 09:40 PM
  #11  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
ok i decided to go with the p's so i can start with the samller combustion chambers. gonna squeeze as much compression out of them as i can. can you show me some more pics of your headers/plugs? if you can get the camera directly above to get an "aerial" view that'd be nice. a good pic of both sides would help me out a lot. thanks.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2011 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,008
Likes: 7
From: Austin, TX
Got some pictures uploaded for you. They are cell phone pics and I just took them, so it's dark outside, but they are good enough to get the idea. The spark plugs are standard length spark plugs.. Nothing special there. The wires are Taylor spiro-pro 8mm with 45* boots on the plugs. 90* boots would be better for clearance, but it'll work this way. Headers are FRPP shorties, but BBK shorties should work and mostly all LT headers will work no problem. Also, all the spark plugs are easy to change with a standard spark plug socket. The cylinder 7 plug by the dipstick is pretty tight, but not too bad. The pictures are in order from cylinder #1-8.

Passenger side


Cylinder #1 (plenty of clearance)


Cylinder #2 (good clearance)


Cylinder #3(middle wire) Good clearance, but the cover does touch the header. The wire does not touch. Should be fine, if not a shorter wire will fix it


Cylinder #4 (again, cover touching header, wire not touching)


Cylinder #5 ( Lots of clearance)


Cylinder #6(It is not touching the header. About 1/4" clearance)


Cylinders 7 and 8 (#7 touches the dipstick, but neither 7 or 8 touch the header tube)
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 08:12 AM
  #13  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
those pics are awesome. thanks a lot, i know its a pain in the johnson to take and post all the pics and i appreciate it.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 09:11 AM
  #14  
Copper head's Avatar
Copper head
Freshman User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Pikeville, KY
The 93-95 Lightnings came with GT-40 heads from the factory and they utilized speed density, not mass-air.

You won't have a problem with the heads. NOW,....the camshaft is a little different story. If it has a lot of duration, you won't be able to get it to idle properly, no matter how much tuning you do (with speed denisty)

With a BIG cam, you'll really need to switch to Mass-Air.
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2011 | 09:28 AM
  #15  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,786
Likes: 1,751
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by Copper head
The 93-95 Lightnings came with GT-40 heads from the factory and they utilized speed density, not mass-air.

You won't have a problem with the heads. NOW,....the camshaft is a little different story. If it has a lot of duration, you won't be able to get it to idle properly, no matter how much tuning you do (with speed denisty)

With a BIG cam, you'll really need to switch to Mass-Air.
Good to see you over here Keith. I hope you can spread some of your knowledge of performance tips on this board as much as you have on NLOC.

Randy Alexander aka rla2005
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE