Notices
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

ULSD Causing Damage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2011 | 08:50 AM
  #16  
84-6.9L's Avatar
84-6.9L
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
Likes: 0
From: Princeton MN
Originally Posted by carolinaranger90
I hope so, he earned it.

My wife and I are managing with our young son, but we aren't swimming in the currency ocean, to boot, I was recently laid off, and my truck kept me going aside from my family.
Ah shucks,
Believe me i know how hard it is to get that money tree to sprout, I just got married last august to a great lady with two kids ages 4 and 2 now, and in january we just added another little boy I named john after my dad who died when i was 10, we are stuck in an apartment til i get enough credit to get a home loan sometime this summer.
If the reps don't come don't worry I'm sure someone else would have said it as well, thats why IMHO this is the best forum out there, everybody tries to help unlike the other forums where alot of questions go unanswered and why members post non-IDI questions here, because we have a grest group of people here!
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #17  
Country_boy_2007's Avatar
Country_boy_2007
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
From: Kville, ohio
i beleave my money tree got drown in all this rain. i will say that this forum is quick to help. good bunch of fokes on here
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 11:57 AM
  #18  
Aune163rd's Avatar
Aune163rd
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 4
From: Victor, MT
Club FTE Silver Member

Well...on the sulfer additive....works wonders, my mileage was not as good as it is now, but i found a Conoco pump that still pumps the old #1 diesel out. I fill up on that and i dont get black smoke as bad if i give it some go pedal....but the sulfer additive turns the #2 diesel into #1 essentially, I did extensive research on it and tested it on a number of tanks of fuel(driving 249 miles to see your fiance is a good way to do this). I found that it increased my mileage just like diesel kleen and the sulfter additive is cheaper in most places than the diesel kleen. I will say its a nice thing to have handy, overall, you can buy it in a 1 gal its cheaper for the $/oz. I really like it, granted when i cant find it i run diesel kleen. I once ran JP-8 and sulfer additive...it worked ok, mileage went down to 13 in town 16 on highway.
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #19  
Aune163rd's Avatar
Aune163rd
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 4
From: Victor, MT
Club FTE Silver Member

I know how you feel on the subject of the money tree, and having little ones, I went on this deployment because i thought the baby my fiance was mine, til the army proved me dead wrong. So much for saving for that haha. I am going to spend the 9k i had saved up on anything I want for the IDI, hence my facelift, gooseneck hitch, and whatnot for the truck, spent $1,500 so far on tires, hitch, turbo parts, turbo, and now I am going after Rhino Bedliner, getting the engine professionally re-sealed and whatnot. I do have some good news if you need an IP, send me a PM.
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 12:19 PM
  #20  
FORD RANGER's Avatar
FORD RANGER
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 19,460
Likes: 0
From: carter lake ia.
yeah i hear ya.
 
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #21  
poocher pup's Avatar
poocher pup
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 421
Likes: 1
if i forget to throw the diesel kleen in the truck at fill-up time i'll just buy a quart of atf and add that, but like the diesel kleen better.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #22  
polarismuddman's Avatar
polarismuddman
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Central, Florida
This new low sulfur diesel is definitely not kind to our injection systems......we are losing all kinds of lubricity because of the lesser sulfur content......
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #23  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,429
Likes: 5,509
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
the ULSD did not kill your pump, old age did.
i don't ad anything to my foel and never had any problems with any of my trucks. my 88 mor has 492k miles on it.
also, i have never seen or heard of an injector pump being damaged by ULSD.
some of the pumps on the mask trucks have over 400,000 miles on ULSD and still work like new.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 19, 2011 | 03:31 PM
  #24  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,429
Likes: 5,509
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by polarismuddman
This new low sulfur diesel is definitely not kind to our injection systems......we are losing all kinds of lubricity because of the lesser sulfur content......

absolutely total 100% bull scrap that the fuel additive companys are selling.


there actually is more lubrication in the new ULSD fuel than there ever was in the old sulfur fuel.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 04:01 PM
  #25  
joe f350's Avatar
joe f350
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,513
Likes: 2
From: concord ca
Originally Posted by tjc transport
absolutely total 100% bull scrap that the fuel additive companys are selling.


there actually is more lubrication in the new ULSD fuel than there ever was in the old sulfur fuel.

x2

#2 diesel should have a cetane rating between 40-55. If I remember correctly, nothing lower then 45 should be run in most common diesel engines, lest it's non-turbo. The higher the cetane rating the better, especially on cold days, as it will make starting an easier process. In the winter, look for the highest number you can find. Also ensure you are using a good additive (Power Service Grey bottle, I have personally had good luck with..it not only has the antigel/anti wax agent, but it also provides for good lubrication of the injector pump, and thus should also keep the rest of the system 'good to go').
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #26  
polarismuddman's Avatar
polarismuddman
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Central, Florida
Minimum cetane in the US is 40......while in other countries it's 55.

Sulfur is not a lubricant in of itself, but it can combine with the nickel content in many metal alloys to form a low melting point eutectic alloy that can increase lubricity. The process used to reduce the sulfur also reduces the fuel's lubricating properties. Lubricity is a measure of the fuel's ability to lubricate and protect the various parts of the engine's fuel injection system from wear. The processing required to reduce sulfur to 15 ppm also removes naturally-occurring lubricity agents in diesel fuel. To manage this change ASTM International (formerly the American Society for Testing and Materials) adopted the lubricity specification defined in ASTM D975[8] for all diesel fuels and this standard went into effect January 1, 2005.[9] The D975 standard defines two USLD standards, Grade No. 2-D S15 (regular ULSD) and Grade No. 1-D S15 (a higher volatility fuel with a lower gelling temperature than regular ULSD).

The refining process that removes the sulfur also reduces the aromatic content and density of the fuel, resulting in a minor decrease in the energy content, by about 1%. This decrease in energy content may result in slightly reduced peak power and fuel economy.

ULSD will run in any engine designed for the ASTM D975 diesel fuels.

It is, however, known to cause some seals to shrink and may cause fuel pump failures; biodiesel blends are reported to prevent that failure. source: Ultra-low-sulfur diesel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So, the use of ULSD between 1993 and 2005 before refineries were required to add lubricants has nothing to do with increased wear on an injection system?
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 05:05 PM
  #27  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,429
Likes: 5,509
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by polarismuddman
Minimum cetane in the US is 40......while in other countries it's 55.

Sulfur is not a lubricant in of itself, but it can combine with the nickel content in many metal alloys to form a low melting point eutectic alloy that can increase lubricity. The process used to reduce the sulfur also reduces the fuel's lubricating properties. Lubricity is a measure of the fuel's ability to lubricate and protect the various parts of the engine's fuel injection system from wear. The processing required to reduce sulfur to 15 ppm also removes naturally-occurring lubricity agents in diesel fuel. To manage this change ASTM International (formerly the American Society for Testing and Materials) adopted the lubricity specification defined in ASTM D975[8] for all diesel fuels and this standard went into effect January 1, 2005.[9] The D975 standard defines two ULSD standards, Grade No. 2-D S15 (regular ULSD) and Grade No. 1-D S15 (a higher volatility fuel with a lower gelling temperature than regular ULSD).

The refining process that removes the sulfur also reduces the aromatic content and density of the fuel, resulting in a minor decrease in the energy content, by about 1%. This decrease in energy content may result in slightly reduced peak power and fuel economy.

ULSD will run in any engine designed for the ASTM D975 diesel fuels.

It is, however, known to cause some seals to shrink and may cause fuel pump failures; biodiesel blends are reported to prevent that failure. source: Ultra-low-sulfur diesel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So, the use of ULSD between 1993 and 2005 before refineries were required to add lubricants has nothing to do with increased wear on an injection system?

i did not say that. i said that the fuel sold NOW has better lubricating properties than the old sulfur fuel did.
the fuel additive companys are still trying to sell the crap that ULSD is no good and will prematurely kill injector pumps. that has been a flat out lie for over 6 years now, as your post confirms
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 05:45 PM
  #28  
carolinaranger90's Avatar
carolinaranger90
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 1
From: Elkhorn, Wiscompton
Originally Posted by tjc transport
absolutely total 100% bull scrap that the fuel additive companys are selling.


there actually is more lubrication in the new ULSD fuel than there ever was in the old sulfur fuel.
Sounds like it's more politically opinionated in here now, I'll just, step out right about......NOW
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 06:37 PM
  #29  
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
i ain't rite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 65,429
Likes: 5,509
From: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Club FTE Gold Member
nope, no political stuff about it at all.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #30  
Dodge/Cummins's Avatar
Dodge/Cummins
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
From: Sweet Home, OR
Originally Posted by tjc transport
i did not say that. i said that the fuel sold NOW has better lubricating properties than the old sulfur fuel did.
the fuel additive companys are still trying to sell the crap that ULSD is no good and will prematurely kill injector pumps. that has been a flat out lie for over 6 years now, as your post confirms
You're 100% right

Worse power and fuel mileage but better lubrication.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE