390 vs. 400
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
390 vs. 400
Whats the verdict? Someone swapped a 400 into my 76 F250 years ago. Now I have this truck, and the 400, while still running smooth, is due for a rebuild.
Should I bother, or should I go find a 390, like the truck originally had....
Pro vs. Cons, anyone?
Should I bother, or should I go find a 390, like the truck originally had....
Pro vs. Cons, anyone?
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
390 vs. 400
...moving forward from that, does an adapter exist that might allow an AOD <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>combo?
Last edited by Craigwell; Mar 23, 2003 at 05:48 PM.
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 3
From: Lincoln USA
390 vs. 400
The <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>puts out a lot of torque. You want a good strong tranny behind it. My advice would be to pick up a good C6.
Or just rebuild the 400.
Or just rebuild the 400.
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Montana
390 vs. 400
It's not just the belhousing that is different. What about all the mounts for the alternator powersteering motormounts ect. There is nothing wrong with the 400 engine and someone went to alot of trouble in the change over ( A friend of mine did the <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>to 400 change over one time and said that he would never do it again). Unless you have to have it all originall but without the original engine what's the point.
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
390 vs. 400
Yes, I understand the amount of work involved, just curious of how the two engine's stacked up power-wise, in reliability, and if the differences would merit the labour intensive job.
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Montana
390 vs. 400
When you start to compare the two engines I would look at other things than just power. The 400 should have Electronic ignition, probably a 4bl intake how's the carb, the 400 probably has hardened exhaust seats or if not then you could probably find a set of heads with them. The 400 is probably eisier to find parts for not that finding parts for a <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>is impossible just take a while. I would say unless you are dead set on having a <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>engine I would stay with the 400. Changing anything over is very expensive and time consuming.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
390 vs. 400
I agree with those who would stay with the 400. I like the <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>a whole lot but there is just too much work involved. You can rebuild a 400 into a great engine. I wouldn't say it is easier to find parts for as the focus in that engine series for performance anyways seems to be centered around the 351 cleveland. This limits your intake options and such as the 400 has a taller deck but that is for a different forum with much more knowledge than I contain. It's up to you though.
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
390 vs. 400
I just changed a '78 F350 w/ a 400 to a '74 360.
Two words.
Butt Rash.
Like some of the others say, it involves a lot of little things, and unless you really want the FE..see the above two words.
Too bad we couldn't have gotten together sooner and swapped engines, this 360 I stuck in here pulls like a locomotive, (
)and the 400 would have saved me LOTS of time and headache!
Take care, and good luck ! !
Two words.
Butt Rash.
Like some of the others say, it involves a lot of little things, and unless you really want the FE..see the above two words.
Too bad we couldn't have gotten together sooner and swapped engines, this 360 I stuck in here pulls like a locomotive, (
)and the 400 would have saved me LOTS of time and headache! Take care, and good luck ! !
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 705
Likes: 2
From: Halifax, NS
390 vs. 400
whoa.. i actually didnt know about the bell! I was just progressing to the next question that came to mind after reading that!
my knowledge in these areas is definitly spotty, considering my truck is two years older than me!
I appreciate all the knowledge I am able to pick up in this room, and thank all of you!
my knowledge in these areas is definitly spotty, considering my truck is two years older than me!
I appreciate all the knowledge I am able to pick up in this room, and thank all of you!
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, TX
390 vs. 400
No, the 385 series engines have a different bellhousing than the 351C/<a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">400m </a>engines. But finding a donor Lincoln with a 460/C6 shouldn't be that hard. Or just rebuild the <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">400m </a>you've got. Are you looking for the easiest way to get back on the road, or are you looking deeper than that?