390 vs. 400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-23-2003, 03:29 PM
Craigwell's Avatar
Craigwell
Craigwell is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 692
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

Whats the verdict? Someone swapped a 400 into my 76 F250 years ago. Now I have this truck, and the 400, while still running smooth, is due for a rebuild.

Should I bother, or should I go find a 390, like the truck originally had....

Pro vs. Cons, anyone?
 
  #2  
Old 03-23-2003, 03:49 PM
BB's Avatar
BB
BB is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Brea CA
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
390 vs. 400

You'll have to swap the tranny too, FE has a unique bellhousing pattern, something to think about.

Barry
 
  #3  
Old 03-23-2003, 05:36 PM
Craigwell's Avatar
Craigwell
Craigwell is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 692
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

...moving forward from that, does an adapter exist that might allow an AOD <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>combo?
 

Last edited by Craigwell; 03-23-2003 at 05:48 PM.
  #4  
Old 03-23-2003, 06:41 PM
flyboy2610's Avatar
flyboy2610
flyboy2610 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lincoln USA
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
390 vs. 400

The <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>puts out a lot of torque. You want a good strong tranny behind it. My advice would be to pick up a good C6.
Or just rebuild the 400.
 
  #5  
Old 03-23-2003, 06:41 PM
67 428 Fairlane Ranchero's Avatar
67 428 Fairlane Ranchero
67 428 Fairlane Ranchero is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

It's not just the belhousing that is different. What about all the mounts for the alternator powersteering motormounts ect. There is nothing wrong with the 400 engine and someone went to alot of trouble in the change over ( A friend of mine did the <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>to 400 change over one time and said that he would never do it again). Unless you have to have it all originall but without the original engine what's the point.
 
  #6  
Old 03-23-2003, 07:12 PM
Craigwell's Avatar
Craigwell
Craigwell is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 692
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

Yes, I understand the amount of work involved, just curious of how the two engine's stacked up power-wise, in reliability, and if the differences would merit the labour intensive job.
 
  #7  
Old 03-23-2003, 07:21 PM
67 428 Fairlane Ranchero's Avatar
67 428 Fairlane Ranchero
67 428 Fairlane Ranchero is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

When you start to compare the two engines I would look at other things than just power. The 400 should have Electronic ignition, probably a 4bl intake how's the carb, the 400 probably has hardened exhaust seats or if not then you could probably find a set of heads with them. The 400 is probably eisier to find parts for not that finding parts for a <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>is impossible just take a while. I would say unless you are dead set on having a <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>engine I would stay with the 400. Changing anything over is very expensive and time consuming.
 
  #8  
Old 03-23-2003, 09:29 PM
Craigwell's Avatar
Craigwell
Craigwell is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 692
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

I'm sold.. no FE for me !
 
  #9  
Old 03-23-2003, 09:33 PM
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Ratsmoker is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Missouri
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
390 vs. 400

I agree with those who would stay with the 400. I like the <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">390 </a>a whole lot but there is just too much work involved. You can rebuild a 400 into a great engine. I wouldn't say it is easier to find parts for as the focus in that engine series for performance anyways seems to be centered around the 351 cleveland. This limits your intake options and such as the 400 has a taller deck but that is for a different forum with much more knowledge than I contain. It's up to you though.
 
  #10  
Old 03-23-2003, 10:07 PM
Crowbar65's Avatar
Crowbar65
Crowbar65 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

I just changed a '78 F350 w/ a 400 to a '74 360.
Two words.
Butt Rash.
Like some of the others say, it involves a lot of little things, and unless you really want the FE..see the above two words.
Too bad we couldn't have gotten together sooner and swapped engines, this 360 I stuck in here pulls like a locomotive, ( )and the 400 would have saved me LOTS of time and headache!

Take care, and good luck ! !
 
  #11  
Old 03-23-2003, 10:24 PM
BB's Avatar
BB
BB is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Brea CA
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
390 vs. 400

Sorry Jason, was just trying to help. Some posters don't know about the bell.

Didn't know you already knew it all.

Barry
 
  #12  
Old 03-24-2003, 02:39 PM
Craigwell's Avatar
Craigwell
Craigwell is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 692
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

whoa.. i actually didnt know about the bell! I was just progressing to the next question that came to mind after reading that!

my knowledge in these areas is definitly spotty, considering my truck is two years older than me!

I appreciate all the knowledge I am able to pick up in this room, and thank all of you!

 
  #13  
Old 03-24-2003, 09:07 PM
429 4v's Avatar
429 4v
429 4v is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: wi
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

a <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">460 </a>would be a fairly simple swap
 
  #14  
Old 03-24-2003, 09:48 PM
Craigwell's Avatar
Craigwell
Craigwell is offline
More Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 692
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

same bell pattern as the 351M/400 ??
 
  #15  
Old 03-24-2003, 11:48 PM
bigric's Avatar
bigric
bigric is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 1,525
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 vs. 400

No, the 385 series engines have a different bellhousing than the 351C/<a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">400m </a>engines. But finding a donor Lincoln with a 460/C6 shouldn't be that hard. Or just rebuild the <a href="http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/">400m </a>you've got. Are you looking for the easiest way to get back on the road, or are you looking deeper than that?
 


Quick Reply: 390 vs. 400



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.