Notices

1.7 Roller Rockers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #1  
TenHoles's Avatar
TenHoles
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
1.7 Roller Rockers?

I'm doing a rebuild/freshen up to a 95 351W and am wondering about the use of 1.7 roller rockers. Basically I want to run the stock cam and swap the stock rockers to 1.7 ratio roller units. I have done some searching but can't find a defintie answer because it seems everyone else using them has them on a stroker or an engine that isn't comparable to mine. Basically I just don't want the SD to end up hunting for idle as my truck is primarily a trail rig and I can't have an erratic idle on the rocks lol. The engine I'm using will still have the stock E7 heads with new valve seals and the valves cut. I may also do some mild gasket match porting and polishing.

Another question I have is with the 1.7RR I should be able to use stock length pushrods correct? Also what about valve spring rate, are the stock springs ok with the added lift?

The info I have researched seems to indicate that it should be fine as far as the SD goes in being able to control idle but I'm still not sure.

Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 10:19 AM
  #2  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
my understanding is you will need new pushrods to run 1.7 rockers.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 02:34 PM
  #3  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

I replaced the stock rockers with 1.7RR on my stock 1987 5.0HO with no other changes. Initially, there were some tapping from the lifters due to the new positions the rockers were pushing them to, but they went away by themselves. The engine is running just fine now. Unless you drastically shaved your heads or block, you should not need new pushrods. Of course, since the new 1.7RR did not change the engine enough to upset the stock SD computer, I wonder just how much performance they're adding to the engine.

If you've also made modifications that allow the stock heads to flow much better, you may run into some issues. You may be able to deal with minor issues by installing an adjustable fuel pressure regulator, and increasing the fuel pressure slightly.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #4  
TenHoles's Avatar
TenHoles
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Thanks for the responses. I think I'm going to go ahead and do the 1.7RR just becasue it's already gonna be apart, roller rockers are better than stock with less friction and 1.7 ratio will open the valves more. There is the question of how much performance gain do you really get out of them but there has to be some.

If I do any port work to my heads it will be to take the hump/bump out of the exhuast side and just clean up the intake side a bit along with a gasket match. Nothing crazy just enough to make me feel better and also to gain a bit of experience with head work. Been reading up a bunch on DIYporting.com

I don't really wanna change the cam as these roller cams are pretty much the best setup for what I do with the truck although I would love to have that rough idle that sounds so badass while the truck is idling over the rocks. Any great experiences from a cam swap and which cam did you use?

From the reading I've done the 1.7RR allow a good idle but just let the engine breathe a bit deeper at the higher RPM. Obviously the main restriction is the intakes but for the money the RR are a good investment IMO

This started out as a super super low budget build but as usual there seems to be a snowball effect starting. I gotta stop it before it's out of control. I'd love to build a 408 stroker but that's DEFINITELY not in the cashflow for awhile.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 10:29 PM
  #5  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
The rockers will allow the motor to breath better at all rpms, and that's good because the 5.8 can really use it. The intake isn't as bad as you think but it does have one glaring restriction that you could address while you have the die grinder out, that is the port exits in the lower where they meet the heads. The ports narrow down in both dimensions in the last inch or so before the gasket surface and it doesn't take much work to remove this, just be carefull not to over do it and not leave enough material for good gasket seating. In this case you don't want to gasket match you just want to port match the exits to the intake openings on the heads.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2011 | 07:24 AM
  #6  
TenHoles's Avatar
TenHoles
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
That's really good to know. I had just been reading on the head work so far and hadn't gotten to the intakes yet. I know the right thing to do would be to buy aftermarket intakes but if I can get a slight performance bump out of the stock ones I'll be fine with that on this motor.

I was always happy with the power the motor in the truck made, well when it had lower miles anyhow. I just figure while it' apart I may as well do some "free" upgrades.

Any suggestions on the rockers? I was gonna go with proform pedastal mount from JEGS
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R&RFord
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
May 30, 2017 08:20 PM
R&RFord
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Apr 28, 2017 10:06 AM
mobes
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
Mar 21, 2016 07:38 PM
Fordenthusiasts
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jan 24, 2012 09:23 PM
70torino429
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
May 15, 2009 10:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.

story-0
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-5
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-7
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE