Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Hydro-boost vs. vacuum boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #1  
mach8274's Avatar
mach8274
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Indian Trail, NC
Hydro-boost vs. vacuum boost

I have a 2011 F-250 diesel and it has vacuum boost brake system. I have heard that the 2011 F-350 diesels have hydro-boost. Why? Not that it matters, just wondering why Ford used different systems.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
jweidert's Avatar
jweidert
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 249
Likes: 14
From: California
I'm curious as well if there is an advantage in one vs the other. I recall this being discussed a while back but haven't been able to locate that thread yet.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #3  
rcorcich's Avatar
rcorcich
Tuned
15 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 333
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Subscribing...
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #4  
rickatic's Avatar
rickatic
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 2
My theory is based on costs. All the gas SD trucks get vac/boost brakes because they produce vacuum with engine. There are likely more gas F250's built than gas F350's. It would likely keep production line differences lower as well. The diesels have to have a vac pump but it is small in size. Hydro-boost makes sense on the F350. JMO, I could be completely wrong
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
Painted Horse's Avatar
Painted Horse
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 4,231
From: Kaysville Utah
Doesn't the Hydroboost offer more braking power? I assume thats the reason the heavier trucks used hydraboost
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #6  
Marauder92V's Avatar
Marauder92V
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Club FTE Silver Member

Found a link that has a pretty good explanation of the differences.
 

Last edited by Stewart_H; Apr 27, 2017 at 04:32 PM. Reason: Old link now leads to virus site. Link removed
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
Marauder92V's Avatar
Marauder92V
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Club FTE Silver Member

I think rickatic and Painted Horse both get gold stars for their answers. There are a ton of F250 gassers and I agree that probably drove the design consideration to go with vacuum. As well, with the increased towing potentials, it appears the hydros do a better job of braking.

It also appears from the article that hydros will continue to work when vacuums won't...
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 07:29 PM
  #8  
mach8274's Avatar
mach8274
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Indian Trail, NC
So...should I have bought an F-350 instead of a 250 for the hydro-boost?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 09:33 PM
  #9  
golfgooroo's Avatar
golfgooroo
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
mach, no need to worry about what could've been. after you've lived with a f150 for ten years like a lot of us...a 250 would be huge improvement. between air bags and proper trailer brakes, you'll have NO issues.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011 | 10:00 PM
  #10  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Marauder92V
I think rickatic and Painted Horse both get gold stars for their answers. There are a ton of F250 gassers and I agree that probably drove the design consideration to go with vacuum.
I disagree. Every truck has a power steering pump, gas or diesel. In '09 when they changed diesel F250s to vacuum assist brakes they had to add a vacuum pump on the front accessory drive to power it. I believe the 2011s use the same type of system.

I don't believe designing the hardware to mount another accessory would be simpler than making the F250 PSD trucks any simpler. Cheaper maybe, and I believe this to be the driving factor here.

Remember that EVERYTHING forward of the rear axle is the exact same on the F250s as it is on the SRW F350s. It makes no difference to the KTP whether or not they're installing a brake booster on an F250 or F550. It's the same truck.

Originally Posted by Marauder92V
As well, with the increased towing potentials, it appears the hydros do a better job of braking.
I believe this to be true. At least when things get really heavy, it might be necessary due to the F350s higher GVWR.

Originally Posted by Marauder92V
It also appears from the article that hydros will continue to work when vacuums won't...
This article is incredibly misleading and downright wrong.

Reminds me of when I got my CDL and the discussion as to why heavy trucks use air brakes. One of the reasons was that with a compressor you can NEVER run out of air. Leaks in the system are no huge deal as long as the compressor keeps up. With a hydraulic system this is completely false, as you carry a finite amount of fluid in the reservoir. Once you're out you loose power to steering and brakes.

Cracked and leaking vacuum lines will still provide a degree of power assist. Cracked and leaking PS lines will leave you power-less in very short order once your supply of fluid is exhausted.

I do not like that article, it's written from the perspective of someone trying to sell hydroboost kits for jeeps.

Not trying to jump on you or anything, I just have a problem with their "facts".
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 12:38 PM
  #11  
mach8274's Avatar
mach8274
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Indian Trail, NC
I'm not worried about the braking performance with my truck. For a vehicle weighing in at almost 8k, it stops pretty damn good. I was just curious, that's all. The gvwr is only 2k higher on a srw 350 so it's not that much different. I did "graduate" from a 150, so this is a vast improvement anyways. My TT is 9k loaded so I doubt I'll have any towing issues.
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #12  
kper05's Avatar
kper05
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,600
Likes: 84
Club FTE Silver Member

That's strange because I'm fairly certain a friend's 2010 F-250 6.4L has hydroboost.
Those brakes do not feel the same as the brakes on my 2011.
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #13  
strokinbeast's Avatar
strokinbeast
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
My 99 f250 superduty has hydroboost. Had a big leak on the power steering cooler and the brakes went to almost nothing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #14  
senix's Avatar
senix
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 37,375
Likes: 1,861
From: Frederick, MD
Club FTE Gold Member
I've got hydroboost on my 08. i feel it provides a little better braking for the heavier loads but that is about it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 03:58 AM
  #15  
stsmark's Avatar
stsmark
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 60
From: Ca Wine country
It's interesting because all the 6.7's have a really nice wet vacuum pump mounted on the front cover driven off the opposite side of the gear for the HP fuel pump. They use the vacuum for waste gate control and EGR cooler bypass control. I bet the power steering pumps are interchangeable as well between 250 and 350 which is the source of the boost.

I will say this, my 350 SRW has great firm brakes.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE