Notices

300 3x2v intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2011 | 10:01 PM
  #16  
krazylegswp's Avatar
krazylegswp
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: wills point
well what do you mean fuel supply/return whats that and would it help save gas over 3 deuce carburetors
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:37 AM
  #17  
1983F1503004x4's Avatar
1983F1503004x4
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 4
2x4 usually produces more power than 3x2. 4-barrels also have the potential to save on fuel economy too. But, power and economy of a 2 vs 4 bbl is a separate issue.

For EFI, you have to have a fuel send and return line. The fuel is also pressurized. One line sends pressurized fuel to the injectors, while the other line catches whatever overflow there is and send it back to the gas tank.

The EFI systems for the 300 usually suck, except for aftermarket systems like the Holley Avenger.

If you want to do an aftermarket performance fuel injection (performance EFI for this motor is usually TBI), you need a 4bbl intake manifold.

If you want to do factory fuel injection, you might as well forget it. You'll have so much space issues with the size of the intake and height of the intake above the motor (it wraps around over the valve cover), not to mention hooking up all the emissions equipment so the computer won't throw codes at you.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 12:07 PM
  #18  
nevrenufhp's Avatar
nevrenufhp
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 5
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by Brian's 48

I found this manifold online. .... ....
I'm thinking trippple TBI. (3X GM TBI with Megasquirt)
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 12:12 PM
  #19  
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 47
From: South central, Minnesota
Originally Posted by 1983F1503004x4
2x4 usually produces more power than 3x2. 4-barrels also have the potential to save on fuel economy too. But, power and economy of a 2 vs 4 bbl is a separate issue.
You are a little off on that statement.

2x4's might make more power on a V8 but if you look at most of the guys racing 300's they are running 3 Holley 2V's or 3 Weber 2V's. On a inline 6 the 3-2V set up aren't set up as a progressive set up like on a V8. All three carbs are synchronized to open at the same time. The 3-2V set up gives the most even air/fuel distribution on the inline 6. Each cylinder has it's own venturi without going to an individual runner set up like the Weber DCOE's & IDA's/IDF's.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 03:37 PM
  #20  
1983F1503004x4's Avatar
1983F1503004x4
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by fordman75
You are a little off on that statement.

2x4's might make more power on a V8 but if you look at most of the guys racing 300's they are running 3 Holley 2V's or 3 Weber 2V's. On a inline 6 the 3-2V set up aren't set up as a progressive set up like on a V8. All three carbs are synchronized to open at the same time. The 3-2V set up gives the most even air/fuel distribution on the inline 6. Each cylinder has it's own venturi without going to an individual runner set up like the Weber DCOE's & IDA's/IDF's.
I was mainly speaking in general about 2 vs 4 bbl carburetors, not specific to inlines. Inlines suffer from poor fuel distribution because of the design of the intakes, and people racing these motors run 2 bbl's because they're trying to circumvent the fuel distribution issues. I imagine if they were able to get around the fuel distribution issues they'd be running 4bbls. Direct vs progressive linkages also aren't specific to an inline. Plenty of people run direct carburetor linkages on V8's with multiple carburetors. If I remember, from watching FrenchtownFlyer's videos on youtube, he was running 2 or 3 4bbls on his six.

If the OP wasn't concerned about hood space, I'd recommend a 2x4 intake with dual Holley 390 CFM carburetors. There was a guy a few counties south of me who had a 300 inline-6 that was built for racing. It had an offset ground crank 0.1'' and the motor was bored over 0.125''. How they did it, I don't know, but that was a huge overbore. I calculated the displacement and it came up to a 327 cu inch straight 6. It was balanced, 10.5 or 11 to 1 compression, Clifford 2x4 intake with Holley 390 CFM carburetors, roller lifters, custom roller cam, and roller rockers, and MASSIVE head work. The whole setup was for sale for 3000$. He's probably still got it for sale too. I think the shop who did it was Norwood Motors.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 04:03 PM
  #21  
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 47
From: South central, Minnesota
Originally Posted by 1983F1503004x4
I was mainly speaking in general about 2 vs 4 bbl carburetors, not specific to inlines. Inlines suffer from poor fuel distribution because of the design of the intakes, and people racing these motors run 2 bbl's because they're trying to circumvent the fuel distribution issues. I imagine if they were able to get around the fuel distribution issues they'd be running 4bbls. Direct vs progressive linkages also aren't specific to an inline. Plenty of people run direct carburetor linkages on V8's with multiple carburetors. If I remember, from watching FrenchtownFlyer's videos on youtube, he was running 2 or 3 4bbls on his six.

If the OP wasn't concerned about hood space, I'd recommend a 2x4 intake with dual Holley 390 CFM carburetors. There was a guy a few counties south of me who had a 300 inline-6 that was built for racing. It had an offset ground crank 0.1'' and the motor was bored over 0.125''. How they did it, I don't know, but that was a huge overbore. I calculated the displacement and it came up to a 327 cu inch straight 6. It was balanced, 10.5 or 11 to 1 compression, Clifford 2x4 intake with Holley 390 CFM carburetors, roller lifters, custom roller cam, and roller rockers, and MASSIVE head work. The whole setup was for sale for 3000$. He's probably still got it for sale too. I think the shop who did it was Norwood Motors.
Well this is the inline forum so saying 2x4V's makes more power then 3-2V's isn't true. And in fact the 2-4V's would probably get better gas mileage on the 300 then 3-2V Holley's would.

And with those clifford 3-2V intakes you can't run progressive linkages. That only works when you have a common plenum.

And I think you need to watch the FTF's vids again. He runs 3 modified Holley 500cfm 2V carbs in his altered. I'm sure if 2-4V carbs worked better he'd be running them. I think I remember him saying he is making around 500 or 550hp.

If it was a 300 bored .125" over he must be running direct water injection( water right from the water jackets into the cylinders. Either that or he sleeved all 6 cylinders and then filled the water jackets. There might be a reason it's still for sale.

Not trying to bust your chops. I love 2-4V carbs on a 300! But for drag racing 3-2V's( or injection ) usually work better on the inline 6.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 06:45 PM
  #22  
1983F1503004x4's Avatar
1983F1503004x4
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 4
Chops not busted so no harm done. People have different opinions on what works best and what they like, and I respect that.

I know those 500 CFM 2bbls from Holley were big, but I didn't know they were that big. Those things look like 4bbls sitting under that air cleaner! He was running a progressive linkage that I saw too.

Getting back on topic, I don't know if I'd be willing to run 3 GM EFI modules and oxygen sensors on one motor. I think a carburetor would work best for the OP's application. Plus, it looks cooler than seeing all that wiring under the hood.

It had the reason that the motor was for sale in the ad: from what I remember, it had ruined lifters. I don't think I'd pay 3000$ for a motor with ruined lifters, but go figure. Sleeving the bore like that seems like the only way that would work, though. Boring it anything over 0.060'' is about a gamble for most any motor, IMO.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 07:16 PM
  #23  
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 47
From: South central, Minnesota
Originally Posted by 1983F1503004x4

I know those 500 CFM 2bbls from Holley were big, but I didn't know they were that big. Those things look like 4bbls sitting under that air cleaner! He was running a progressive linkage that I saw too.
That "little" scoop sitting on top of the carbs can make them look bigger.
His linkage isn't a progressive linkage. His linkage is a bar with an arm for each carb, then a short linkage to each carb.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:56 PM
  #24  
1983F1503004x4's Avatar
1983F1503004x4
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by fordman75
That "little" scoop sitting on top of the carbs can make them look bigger.
His linkage isn't a progressive linkage. His linkage is a bar with an arm for each carb, then a short linkage to each carb.
Too many things on the brain lately. I can't think straight, but most people that know me don't think of me as a straight thinker. LOL
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2012 | 12:09 PM
  #25  
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 10
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by 1983F1503004x4
Too many things on the brain lately. I can't think straight, but most people that know me don't think of me as a straight thinker. LOL
But you must certainly be entertaining to them...
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2015 | 04:55 PM
  #26  
krazylegswp's Avatar
krazylegswp
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: wills point
found a wonderful option

after years of looking and trying to design my own manifold for my project i just happened to stumple on this brilliant piece





by using the offy 4v manifold





this from vintagespeed.com will bolt right up they even have different options to mount holley and 3 bolt carbs





looks like good flow





the also sell complete rochester kits





or if you wanted to go two





complete





even different carbs





and mounting


 
Reply
Old May 27, 2015 | 05:11 PM
  #27  
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 47
From: South central, Minnesota
Those set ups are cool. But my opinion is they are just for looks. Since your main intake is still a single 4V intake. You aren't really going to gain any performance over a single 4V carb. If you are building a hot rod and just want the multi-carb look then the setups you posted would be the easiest way to go.

But compare that to an actual multi-carb intake which will give you a more even air/fuel distribution. No contest.

I think the best set up, if you can't build one from scratch, is still to start with an EFI lower intake and build a custom plenum. Doing that lets you evenly space out the carbs with out having to build an intake from scratch.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2015 | 05:36 PM
  #28  
krazylegswp's Avatar
krazylegswp
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: wills point
I agree somewhat but its still using a tri power system running off the center carb when cruising but 3 carbs still allows for greater fuel volume when the accelerator is dropped an intake designed for three carbs would definitely provide better dispersion but you should still get performance from the setup these engines don't flow the same as a v8 and may be very close to the same as a manifold for 3x2 in all honesty it is about the looks primarily but there is performance gains to be had

The look im going for is a stock appearance and a dont see a fabbed manifold looking as good as this
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2015 | 06:08 PM
  #29  
gfburke's Avatar
gfburke
More Turbo
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 621
Likes: 13
Damn. Always wanted a factoryfive. Was going to use my 89 5ooooh as the donor.
Straight up 6 would be bad ***.
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2015 | 06:19 PM
  #30  
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
Lead Driver
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,293
Likes: 47
From: South central, Minnesota
Originally Posted by krazylegswp
I agree somewhat but its still using a tri power system running off the center carb when cruising but 3 carbs still allows for greater fuel volume when the accelerator is dropped an intake designed for three carbs would definitely provide better dispersion but you should still get performance from the setup these engines don't flow the same as a v8 and may be very close to the same as a manifold for 3x2 in all honesty it is about the looks primarily but there is performance gains to be had

The look im going for is a stock appearance and a dont see a fabbed manifold looking as good as this
That's fine but you are still feeding the extra air/fuel through a centrally located hole in the intake. So your front and rear cylinders aren't going to get the same mixture as the center cylinders. So those 3 carbs won't perform any better then a single 4V. But 3 are cooler then 1!

The 240/300 is a long intake, not a short one like most V8's.

Will those adapters work, sure. But an actual multi-carb intake will perform better.

And there is nothing stock in appearance about a multi-carb set up on a 300! But I get what you mean. But I'm still building my own.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE