When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
These new trucks have so much tech stuff under the hood that nothing is simple to work on I would think Ford with there better ideas would realize that its time (actully past due) for a tilt nose front end on these trucks, agree or disagree?
totally agree. Wish they had it. Trouble is that I don't think it would pass the safey required by the feds for this class of truck. wish there was someone aftermarket would make an aftermarket front clip.
Your probably right safety issues slow progress however the need is there and Ford needs to get their act together and engineer a better way, seeing these Ford techs lift an entire truck cab just to do a motor job is down right ridiculous ....
remember, the 6.0 and 6.4 engines were not the ford design, so they had to make compromises to make it work..
you can bet ford did NOT want to have to pull a cab.. but they got snookered..
Its still a nightmare under the hood a tilt nose is needed, but nice to hear that pulling a cab is no longer necessary to pull a motor, ifn Ford can't figure a way to build a tilt nose maybe a inline six could help, I know that sounds ridiculous but what they are building is not user friendly , service friendly or common sense friendly. these new model trucks are never going to see the same service life as the previous models.....
I wouldn't bet on these new trucks having a shorter service life. As a matter of fact, I'm betting just the opposite.
Ford essentially had a tilt hood on the 6.4s, well partially anyway.
I also wouldn't bet that Ford was forced to compromise for the International engine. I would bet they were pretty much designed together. If anything International likely had to redesign some things a bit for Ford.
Ford essentially had a tilt hood on the 6.4s, well partially anyway.
i think its funny that ford made a big deal of it "ALL NEW FRONT STEP BUMPER" combined with the attached grille to make for easier access for maintenance, and the 2011 has neither.
I wouldn't bet on these new trucks having a shorter service life. As a matter of fact, I'm betting just the opposite.
Larry NCKS, I hope your right but I think you'll be wrong , these trucks are too tech and not accessible for service work, most small business owners can not afford to just send there truck to the dealer for servicing they need to do most if not all the service work in house, the dealers just charge too much per hour, my local shop is at 120 per hour for an F-450 and up, all of Fords previous diesel could be serviced under a shade tree with a couple of six packs on the side, try that with a new tech motor....
Larry NCKS, I hope your right but I think you'll be wrong , these trucks are too tech and not accessible for service work, most small business owners can not afford to just send there truck to the dealer for servicing they need to do most if not all the service work in house, the dealers just charge too much per hour, my local shop is at 120 per hour for an F-450 and up, all of Fords previous diesel could be serviced under a shade tree with a couple of six packs on the side, try that with a new tech motor....
I have two Ford (NH) Genesis tractors. We were scared of these computerized monsters when they first came out too. Do you know that I've successfully diagnosed these rascals on more than one ocassion and even decabbed one and split it in three pieces to make the needed repair? Made my dealer mad!!!! Shoot, everytime they went in while under warranty the dealer was apt to upgrade the software. On one ocassion my 8770 came back with an inoperative acre counter. Dealer personnel swore up and down they didn't do anything to it. I figured it out. Their new software update had a new operator programmable feature to it. They didn't even know it. I never did get the $500.00 tech fee I told them they owed me for figuring that one out.
I'm betting that where there's a will and access to service information, there's a way. Afterall, I just diagnosed my EGR before it went in for warranty replacement.
I wouldn't bet on these new trucks having a shorter service life. As a matter of fact, I'm betting just the opposite.
Larry NCKS, I hope your right but I think you'll be wrong , these trucks are too tech and not accessible for service work, most small business owners can not afford to just send there truck to the dealer for servicing they need to do most if not all the service work in house, the dealers just charge too much per hour, my local shop is at 120 per hour for an F-450 and up, all of Fords previous diesel could be serviced under a shade tree with a couple of six packs on the side, try that with a new tech motor....
Paul will come along, but you can bet they have thought about these issues and are NOT trying to force people to the dealer. Serviceability was key on their 6.7 engine after all the fun on the 6.0 and 6.4s.
yes, there are some complex systems, and the guy that just wrenches will be less effective than before.. but such is the way of ALL the powertrain systems in all the vehicles..
ok lets correct the whole 6.7 ease of repair.
to remove the cyclinder heads or the engine cab off is the method suggested to use in the workshop.
the lack of serviceability on the 6.4 is just myth. There in a lot of ways easer to deal with then a 6.0.
so far as us the techs not being able to handle the "complex" well thats just a mean statment that also lacks truth. Not to say there wont be a learning curve but it well be like any other engine to come. If it can be built it can be fixed.
and to add to what Cheezit and Senix said, cab off is a 'time saver' in most cases. amazing how a cab off process can be a total time saver.. but you gotta do what you gotta do.
reality is pulling a cab on a 6.4 is a total waste of time. I have also not seen any proof that pulling one on a 6.0 is of any benefit. people claim its easer to work on the engine. there may be some truth to that, but I still have not found it to be faster.