1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

240 vs. 300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-10-2010, 12:48 AM
IsoGrifo's Avatar
IsoGrifo
IsoGrifo is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maricopa
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
240 vs. 300

Hey guys! It's been a while. trucks been sitting for the past 6 months or so unfortunately, but it is what it is. started it up and drove down the street only to run out of gas, haha. had to push it back about a block.

Anyways, reason of the post. It has been said that the only way to tell the difference between a 240 and a 300 is by actually measuring the stroke. I brought it up once and it was never really resolved as a fairly concise way of differentiating, that the the oil pan on the 240 has the drain plug more to the drivers side, whereas the 300 has it almost dead center. I discovered this by looking at the 300 and 240 I have built 8 days apart, one may 12 1965, the other may 20.

I'm hoping you guys on here with either or both engines can help us all decide as to whether, in stock form, this is an official way to differentiate the two if they have stock oil pans. also remember I found it on 65 engines, it might not hold true for 66s.

Thanks everyone!
 
  #2  
Old 12-10-2010, 05:50 AM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker
jowilker is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 24,552
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Joel, Forgive me for asking, but in the second paragraph, second sentence,........ is there something there that you don't understand???




John
 
  #3  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:21 AM
Broomfieldbum's Avatar
Broomfieldbum
Broomfieldbum is offline
Laughing Gas

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Thornton, Colorado
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
As far as I know the engine in my 66 is a 240, and the oil drain plug is dead center on the back of the pan. I don't know what this does for your findings. It could be a case like the 65/66 grills. At some point Ford decided it was stupid to make 2 pans, or that this pan or that pan had a flaw and went to the other pan exclusively. Who knows?
 
  #4  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:31 AM
garbz2's Avatar
garbz2
garbz2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 6,060
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
240 was installed in cars. Hence a possible differing pan. the 300 was never installed in cars.

There are a multitude of pans for the 240 300 based on the applications in cars truck or vans and even four wheel drives.

Joel, how did you magically figgure the engines are eight days apart?

Garbz
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trozei
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
40
09-12-2020 09:22 PM
jim kovaleski
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
11-23-2013 11:01 PM
karljay
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
15
11-21-2004 10:03 AM
Syntheglass
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
11
08-20-2004 08:56 PM
SteveS
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
2
11-26-2001 06:25 PM



Quick Reply: 240 vs. 300



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.